Human Resource Management Practices and Wage Dispersion in U.S. Establishments



Appendix B: Workforce and Firm Weighted-Average Characteristics by Practices- NES93 and NES96

Year

NES

1993

NES

1996

System

No EI

Partial

Full

No EI

Partial

Full

Workforce

Education
Managers

14.20

15.11

15.31

14.35

14.70

15.12

(0.21)

(0.07)

(0.11)

(0.25)

(0.07)

(0.10)

Front-line

11.84

12.11

12.24

11.98

12.26

12.90

(0.09)

(0.04)

(0.07)

(0.09)

(0.05)

(0.10)

Composition
% Women

26.06

43.49

38.32

31.89

36.21

42.52

(2.73)

(1.27)

(1.83)

(3.74)

(1.15)

(1.46)

% Minorities

13.31

23.31

21.92

20.33

21.99

21.38

(2.78)

(1.05)

(1.62)

(2.78)

(1.01)

(1.39)

% New Hired

19.32

24.62

27.46

10.01

17.58

17.65

(1.56)

(1.05)

(1.80)

(1.22)

(0.69)

(0.77)

% Managers

14.72

10.39

9.95

10.89

13.19

11.68

(1.05)

(0.32)

(0.61)

(0.92)

(0.51)

(0.49)

% Front-lines

59.17

65.65

66.34

58.66

57.06

53.12

(2.26)

(1.00)

(1.81)

(2.78)

(1.00)

(1.53)

Pay

Wages

Managers (in log)

2.88

2.81

2.85

3.20

2.99

3.15

(0.04)

(0.02)

(0.04)

(0.06)

(0.02)

(0.03)

Front-lines (in log)

2.35

2.16

2.18

2.45

2.38

2.40

(0.04)

(0.02)

(0.03)

(0.04)

(0.02)

(0.03)

Log of the ratio

0.48

0.64

0.65

0.63

0.63

0.73

(0.05)

(0.02)

(0.03)

(0.04)

(0.01)

(0.02)

Incentive pay

Prof. Sha. or Stck opt.

0.72

0.72

0.90

0.42

0.43

0.50

(0.06)

(0.02)

(0.02)

(0.07)

(0.02)

(0.03)

Prof. Sharing (1993)

0.04

0.15

0.33

(0.02)

(0.02)

(0.03)

Stck. Option (1993)

0.52

0.45

0.58

(0.06)

(0.02)

(0.04)

Prof. Sharing Ft-L. wkers only (1993)

0.72

0.74

0.90

(0.06)

(0.02)

(0.02)

Involvement

Workers

% Ft-lines Meetings

54.84

69.07

66.30

64.57

(1.77)

(2.77)

(1.70)

(2.18)

% Ft-lines Team

7.77

31.45

13.24

42.86

0.89)

(2.21)

(1.24)

(1.87)

% Ft-lines Job Rotation

11.80

25.91

13.39

30.79

(1.07)

(2.15)

(1.11)

(1.51)

Training

Training Team-Meetings (Ft-lines)

0.51

0.73

0.68

0.89

(0.02)

(0.03)

(0.02)

(0.01)

Training Team-Meetings (Mngers) (1996)

0.83

0.81

(0.01)

(0.02)

34



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. ENERGY-RELATED INPUT DEMAND BY CROP PRODUCERS
3. Natural hazard mitigation in Southern California
4. The migration of unskilled youth: Is there any wage gain?
5. Does adult education at upper secondary level influence annual wage earnings?
6. Declining Discount Rates: Evidence from the UK
7. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln
8. What Contribution Can Residential Field Courses Make to the Education of 11-14 Year-olds?
9. An Investigation of transience upon mothers of primary-aged children and their school
10. CONSUMER PERCEPTION ON ALTERNATIVE POULTRY