Human Resource Management Practices and Wage Dispersion in U.S. Establishments



Appendix A.1: Percentage of Employee Involvement by Practice Dummy

This appendix discusses the definition of employee involvement practices adoption based on the percentage
of workers under the given practice. The table below computes average percentages of workers under each of
the bundles of employee involvement practices. One can see that the average percentages vary a lot from across
practices, whether they are considered individually as combinations. They vary between 15 and 70% in 1993 and
between 6 and 80% in 1996. Job rotation is the practice that hardly reaches 50% of workers. Therefore, letting
the definition of the adoption start at a percentage of workers higher than 1% leads to the question of which
ideal percentage should apply. Moreover, choosing any percentage higher than 25% implies that teamwork and
job rotation cannot be analyzed as individual practices. To avoid this problem, I kept the 1% definition in the
remaining of the paper.

Practices

Meeting

Team

Job Rot.

Meeting
&
Team

Meeting
&

Job Rot.

Team
&
Job Rot.

All

Year

1993

Sector

Manuf.

% Meet.

46.75

0

0

54.97

49.41

0

56.82

(3.55)

(5.05)

(4.17)

(3.81)

% Team

0

15.16

0

43.80

0

33.74

37.44

(8.28)

(4.36)

(11.65)

(2.91)

% Job Rot.

0

0

36.59

0

34.31

24.35

49.56

(9.66)

(3.36)

(6.04)

(3.65)

N

116

2

14

62

91

10

103

Sector

Non Man.

% Meet.

71.02

0

0

74.62

43.08

0

59.82

(3.37)

(4.41)

(4.35)

(4.72)

% Team

0

55.01

0

37.73

0

39.16

35.75

(21.28)

(4.09)

(17.66)

(3.35)

% Job Rot.

0

0

19.31

0

31.34

24.32

25.11

(5.96)

(3.43)

(12.54)

(3.11)

N

107

3

13

49

65

4

73

Year

1996

Sector

Manuf.

% Meet.

60.30

0

0

59.06

67.89

0

55.10

(3.97)

(3.97)

(3.58)

(2.82)

% Team

0

6.39

0

35.07

0.00

79.49

47.71

(0.60)

(3.04)

(11.17)

(2.77)

% Job Rot.

0

0

44.76

0

47.19

27.97

45.22

(12.57)

(3.02)

(8.14)

(2.60)

N

84

7

9

78

112

7

160

Sector

Non Man.

% Meet.

77.29

0

0

77.52

82.69

0

76.45

(3.40)

(5.40)

(3.56)

(3.27)

% Team

0

70.51

0

53.01

0

28.65

38.10

(16.05)

(5.01)

(2.63)

(3.24)

% Job Rot.

0

0

21.76

0

38.27

27.94

40.75

(4.77)

(3.79)

(3.17)

(3.77)

N

80

6

9

45

76

4

82

31



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Moi individuel et moi cosmique Dans la pensee de Romain Rolland
3. The name is absent
4. New Evidence on the Puzzles. Results from Agnostic Identification on Monetary Policy and Exchange Rates.
5. Examining the Regional Aspect of Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Fighting windmills? EU industrial interests and global climate negotiations
11. The East Asian banking sector—overweight?
12. The name is absent
13. Wage mobility, Job mobility and Spatial mobility in the Portuguese economy
14. Land Police in Mozambique: Future Perspectives
15. Globalization, Redistribution, and the Composition of Public Education Expenditures
16. An Estimated DSGE Model of the Indian Economy.
17. FOREIGN AGRICULTURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS AND FOREIGN RELATIONS
18. Endogenous Heterogeneity in Strategic Models: Symmetry-breaking via Strategic Substitutes and Nonconcavities
19. Does South Africa Have the Potential and Capacity to Grow at 7 Per Cent?: A Labour Market Perspective
20. Migrating Football Players, Transfer Fees and Migration Controls