On the Relation between Robust and Bayesian Decision Making



3 Linking Bayesian and Robust Decision Prob-
lems

The objective of this section is to establish a link between the Bayesian and the
robust decision problems described in the previous section. The main idea is to
change the objective function of the Bayesian decision problem in a way that
the Bayesian’s objective will have the same minimum as the robust objective.

Since the Bayesian’s loss function depends on the action x, altering the loss
function is a back-door through which one can cause the Bayesian to behave as
if her priors were changing across actions. In particular, if the Bayesian was to
maximize a transformed loss function
T(L(x,s)) with the property that

T(L(x, s)) = L(x, s) ——-,-—ɪ                         (5)

Ps

where ps is the prior probability for state s, then the Bayesian problem would
be identical to the robust decision problem:

min E [T(L(x, s))]

nΩ1

= min ^ L(x,si)1 (x,Sl)pi
^Ωs ,                  pi

i=l

= min R(x)
xΩx

Of course, such a transformed ’loss function’ is not a loss function in the strict
sense since it depends on prior probabilities.

Given that direct equivalence between the two problems requires a Bayesian
loss that depends on priors, the strategy is to construct a sequence of trans-
formed loss functions
Tk(L(x,s)) for the Bayesian problem with the property
that these transformed loss functions are
independent of the prior. At the same
time the solution to

min E [Tk(L(x, s))]                            (6)

ω

which is denoted by x*k should converge to the robust solution x* as к increases
without bound, i.e.

jɪɪɪɪ ιxk -x* и =°.

k→∞



More intriguing information

1. The Cost of Food Safety Technologies in the Meat and Poultry Industries.
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Nonparametric cointegration analysis
5. Evaluating Consumer Usage of Nutritional Labeling: The Influence of Socio-Economic Characteristics
6. Strategic Planning on the Local Level As a Factor of Rural Development in the Republic of Serbia
7. Insurance within the firm
8. Using Surveys Effectively: What are Impact Surveys?
9. The name is absent
10. TINKERING WITH VALUATION ESTIMATES: IS THERE A FUTURE FOR WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT MEASURES?