DC DC N
Var (Xm) = -mVar(δι) + 4'Var(δm) + ∑-c2Var(δi)
4 4 i=3
DC
Var(δi) -m + ∑Dc2
because Var(δ1) = Var(δ2) = Var(δi).
tains PiC=1
Dm + PN=3 -C] > P
i=3
Since Dm + PiN=3 Dc = PiN=1 Dsq, one ob-
iN=1 Ds2q by Lagrangian maximization. Hence, it is al-
ways V ar (Xm) >Var(Xsq). Since f(Xsq) and f(Xm) are well behaved (they approach
a normal distribution), they intersect only in two points.11 This, along with the sym-
metry of the two density functions around the same mean E[Xm] = E[Xsq] = Dtot and
Var(Xm ) >Var(Xsq ), implies
Φsq = Pr(Xsq > Rtot) > Φm = Pr(Xm > Rtot) for any Rtot < -tot,
and vice versa for Rtot > DCot. Using Proposition 1, Rtot = NRsq, and (1), we obtain that
Rtot < D2ot if rD < 4 ≡ σ. The first statement follows.
Using the definition in (7), we have
Ωm - --sq
Dtot
tot (Xm
Dtot
Rtot)fm (Xm)d(Xm) - (Xsq
Rtot
Rtot)fsq(Xsq)d(Xsq)
DtotXmfm(Xm)d(Xm) - DtotXsqfsq(Xsq)d(Xsq)
Rtot Rtot
-Rtot(1
Fm(Rtot)) +Rtot(1
Fsq(Rtot)).
Deriving it with respect to Rtot gives
d(Ωm
Ωsq )
dRtot
-Rtotfm (Rtot) + Rtotfsq(Rtot) - (1
Fm(Rtot))
+Rtotfm (Rtot) + (1 - Fsq (Rtot))
Fm(Rtot) - Fsq (Rtot).
Rtotfsq(Rtot)
As showed earlier, Fm(Rtot) - Fsq (Rtot ) > 0 for Rtot < Dot and Fm(Rtot)
for Rtot > DCot. Also, Fm(0) = Fsq(0) = 0 and Fm(Rtot) = Fsq(Rtot) = 0. This implies
Fsq(Rtot) < 0
Ωm — Ωsq > 0 for all Rtot ∈ [0, Dtot]. The second statement follows.
Q.E.D.
Proof of Lemma 3
Suppose first -r-D < ρ. In this range, the aggregate reserve/deposit ratio in the status quo
(which coincides with the individual banks’ deposit ratio) is smaller than the one after
merger; i.e.,
k = Rsq = P=ι Rsq < K_
ksq Dsq NDsq <Km
11A formal proof that this is the case is in Manzanares (2002).
36
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Commitment devices, opportunity windows, and institution building in Central Asia
3. Initial Public Offerings and Venture Capital in Germany
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. ARE VOLATILITY EXPECTATIONS CHARACTERIZED BY REGIME SHIFTS? EVIDENCE FROM IMPLIED VOLATILITY INDICES
7. Macro-regional evaluation of the Structural Funds using the HERMIN modelling framework
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Passing the burden: corporate tax incidence in open economies