45
Table 8. Program impact on off-farm and farm jobs, treatment indicator interacted with
quartile dummies of education and age, 1999 and 2004.
Education Age
|
(1) off-farm |
(2) farm |
(3) off-farm |
(4) farm | |
|
least education (dummy) x |
0.026 |
-0.170 | ||
|
treatment x year2004 |
(0.36) |
(2.08)** | ||
|
second least education (dummy) |
0.147 |
-0.085 | ||
|
x treatment x year2004 |
(2.00)** |
(1.09) | ||
|
second most education |
0.235 |
-0.117 | ||
|
(dummy) x treatment x year2004 |
(3.03)*** |
(1.48) | ||
|
most education (dummy) x |
0.216 |
-0.061 | ||
|
treatment x year2004 youngest age group (dummy) x |
(2.54)** |
(0.71) |
0.374 |
-0.095 |
|
treatment x year2004 |
(4.46)*** |
(1.20) | ||
|
second youngest age group |
0.189 |
-0.096 | ||
|
(dummy) x treatment x year2004 |
(2.46)** |
(1.19) | ||
|
second oldest age group |
0.153 |
-0.082 | ||
|
(dummy) x treatment x year2004 |
(2.01)** |
(0.99) | ||
|
oldest age group (dummy) x |
-0.134 |
-0.266 | ||
|
treatment x year2004 |
-0.006 |
-0.000 |
(2.32)** |
(3.03)*** |
|
(7.40)*** |
(0.01) | |||
|
education in 2002 |
0.013 |
-0.006 | ||
|
(4.22)*** |
(1.92)* | |||
|
treatment |
-0.044 |
0.002 |
-0.037 |
0.012 |
|
(0.88) |
(0.04) |
(0.74) |
(0.22) | |
|
year 2004 dummy |
0.050 |
0.096 |
0.032 |
0.107 |
|
(0.88) |
(1.50) |
(0.57) |
(1.64) | |
|
year 2004 * Yangtze basin |
0.062 |
-0.052 |
0.092 |
-0.049 |
|
(1.96)** |
(1.44) |
(2.78)*** |
(1.36) | |
|
household size |
0.010 |
-0.012 |
0.012 |
-0.011 |
|
(1.70)* |
(1.85)* |
(2.00)** |
(1.75)* | |
|
total land holdings |
-0.001 |
-0.000 |
-0.001 |
-0.000 |
|
(0.89) |
(0.22) |
(0.87) |
(0.32) | |
|
individual had (1)(2) off-farm work |
0.733 |
0.733 |
0.736 |
0.723 |
|
(3)(4) on-farm work in 1999 (1,0) |
(24.87)*** |
(28.13)*** |
(24.66)*** |
(27.11)*** |
|
Observations |
1,928 |
1,930 |
1,924 |
1,926 |
Absolute value of z-statistics in parentheses.
* significant at 10 percent level; ** at 5 percent; *** at 1 percent level
More intriguing information
1. Developing vocational practice in the jewelry sector through the incubation of a new ‘project-object’2. Strategic Investment and Market Integration
3. THE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LABORATORY
4. HOW WILL PRODUCTION, MARKETING, AND CONSUMPTION BE COORDINATED? FROM A FARM ORGANIZATION VIEWPOINT
5. A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING SOCIAL WELFARE EFFECTS OF NEW AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY
6. Secondary school teachers’ attitudes towards and beliefs about ability grouping
7. Investment in Next Generation Networks and the Role of Regulation: A Real Option Approach
8. Better policy analysis with better data. Constructing a Social Accounting Matrix from the European System of National Accounts.
9. Mortality study of 18 000 patients treated with omeprazole
10. Opciones de política económica en el Perú 2011-2015