Appendix B: Details of studies included in the review (not screening tools)
APPENDIX B: Details of studies included in the review (not screening tools)
|
Item |
Country |
Study design |
Population features |
Features of intervention |
Mode, provider and setting |
Type of |
|
Boekeloo et |
USA |
RCT Process |
Age Young people Gender Mixed sex |
What is being assessed? Unspecified health check, with What is offered to the young Not stated / unclear |
What is the mode of the assessment? Consultation / interview Who provides the intervention? Self-assessment Family physician Intervention site Primary care |
Effectiveness |
|
Borup |
Denmark |
Survey |
Age Young people 11,13 and 15 year-olds Gender Mixed sex Other information Data presented on age, |
What is being assessed? Unspecified health check What is offered to the young Not stated / unclear |
What is the mode of the assessment? Consultation / interview Who provides the intervention? School nurse |
Acceptability |
A scoping review of the evidence relevant to life checks for young people aged 9 to 14 years
46
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Modellgestützte Politikberatung im Naturschutz: Zur „optimalen“ Flächennutzung in der Agrarlandschaft des Biosphärenreservates „Mittlere Elbe“
3. The name is absent
4. Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO Agricultural Negotiations
5. Does Presenting Patients’ BMI Increase Documentation of Obesity?
6. The Context of Sense and Sensibility
7. The name is absent
8. Mergers under endogenous minimum quality standard: a note
9. Integrating the Structural Auction Approach and Traditional Measures of Market Power
10. 5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan