Retirement and the Poverty of the Elderly in Portugal



TABLE 4-1: Cross sectional comparisons of low income incidence: retired
people, non-retired adults, and workers

Year -

Workers

Male__________________

Female_______________

All

Not retired

Retired

Not retired

Retired

Workers

Not retired

Retired

Workers

1994

13,1%

16,0%

34,1%

11,0%

18,8%

29,9%

12,2%

17,4%

31,7%

1995

13,5%

15,1%

36,2%

10,2%

17,7%

35,8%

12,1%

16,4%

35,9%

JZ
g

1996

12,7%

15,5%

32,9%

12,7%

18,4%

33,6%

12,7%

17,0%

33,3%

^co

1997

12,4%

14,9%

30,9%

12,2%

19,0%

33,0%

12,3%

17,0%

32,1%

φ
о
0

1998

12,8%

15,8%

27,8%

12,8%

19,2%

34,2%

12,8%

17,5%

31,4%

CL

1999

14,0%

16,9%

30,7%

10,9%

18,3%

33,4%

12,6%

17,6%

32,2%

2000

14,0%

17,0%

30,5%

10,2%

16,8%

32,6%

12,3%

16,9%

31,6%

2001

12,4%

16,1%

32,7%

9,9%

17,2%

35,4%

11,3%

16,6%

34,2%

1994

24,5%

27,8%

53,3%

20,3%

30,4%

48,3%

22,8%

29,2%

50,5%

1995

25,4%

27,8%

48,7%

20,5%

30,3%

51,0%

23,4%

29,1%

50,0%

^E

1996

24,2%

27,9%

47,0%

22,1%

31,2%

49,1%

23,3%

29,6%

48,2%

^co

1997

23,9%

27,6%

47,3%

21,9%

31,2%

49,5%

23,0%

29,5%

48,5%

Φ
о

1998

24,8%

28,3%

42,5%

22,5%

31,2%

50,8%

23,8%

29,8%

47,1%

о
CL

1999

25,6%

29,2%

45,8%

21,0%

30,8%

48,0%

23,6%

30,0%

47,0%

2000

24,6%

27,4%

45,9%

22,9%

30,2%

47,5%

23,8%

28,8%

46,8%

2001

23,6%

27,3%

47,5%

22,6%

32,1%

48,2%

23,1%

29,8%

47,9%

1994

14,8%

17,9%

38,8%

12,3%

20,7%

33,8%

13,8%

19,4%

36,0%

1995

14,9%

16,4%

36,8%

11,2%

18,9%

37,0%

13,3%

17,7%

36,9%


ф

1996

14,4%

17,4%

34,8%

14,0%

20,1%

35,3%

14,2%

18,8%

35,1%

ф

1997

13,1%

15,5%

31,2%

12,4%

19,6%

33,2%

12,8%

17,6%

32,4%

sp
Os

1998

13,7%

16,8%

29,3%

13,8%

20,3%

35,4%

13,7%

18,6%

32,7%

О
СО

1999

12,5%

15,5%

28,8%

9,9%

16,9%

31,1%

11,4%

16,2%

30,1%

2000

13,3%

16,1%

29,6%

9,3%

16,1%

31,1%

11,5%

16,1%

30,5%

2001

10,7%

14,3%

27,5%

8,7%

14,8%

31,1%

9,8%

14,5%

29,5%

1994

19,6%

23,3%

48,2%

16,1%

25,6%

42,0%

18,2%

24,5%

44,7%


ф

1995

15,8%

17,7%

38,2%

12,0%

19,9%

39,3%

14,2%

18,9%

38,8%

1996

13,6%

16,7%

33,4%

13,3%

19,1%

34,5%

13,5%

17,9%

34,0%

E

1997

11,6%

13,8%

29,9%

11,7%

17,9%

31,7%

11,6%

15,9%

30,9%

о
о
т-

1998

11,4%

14,1%

25,6%

11,6%

17,3%

32,8%

11,5%

15,7%

29,6%

sp
Os
СО

1999

9,8%

12,4%

23,2%

7,8%

13,8%

25,1%

9,0%

13,1%

24,2%

СО

2000

6,4%

8,6%

18,0%

4,5%

9,2%

18,1%

5,6%

8,9%

18,0%

2001

6,5%

9,3%

18,1%

5,1%

9,8%

17,2%

5,9%

9,6%

17,6%

Source: Authors computations based on ECHP.

28



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The bank lending channel of monetary policy: identification and estimation using Portuguese micro bank data
3. Washington Irving and the Knickerbocker Group
4. The name is absent
5. Locke's theory of perception
6. The name is absent
7. Restructuring of industrial economies in countries in transition: Experience of Ukraine
8. DETERMINANTS OF FOOD AWAY FROM HOME AMONG AFRICAN-AMERICANS
9. Forecasting Financial Crises and Contagion in Asia using Dynamic Factor Analysis
10. The name is absent
11. The name is absent
12. Non Linear Contracting and Endogenous Buyer Power between Manufacturers and Retailers: Empirical Evidence on Food Retailing in France
13. The Modified- Classroom ObservationScheduletoMeasureIntenticnaCommunication( M-COSMIC): EvaluationofReliabilityandValidity
14. Expectation Formation and Endogenous Fluctuations in Aggregate Demand
15. A Regional Core, Adjacent, Periphery Model for National Economic Geography Analysis
16. Top-Down Mass Analysis of Protein Tyrosine Nitration: Comparison of Electron Capture Dissociation with “Slow-Heating” Tandem Mass Spectrometry Methods
17. Inhimillinen pääoma ja palkat Suomessa: Paluu perusmalliin
18. American trade policy towards Sub Saharan Africa –- a meta analysis of AGOA
19. Word Sense Disambiguation by Web Mining for Word Co-occurrence Probabilities
20. The name is absent