TABLE 4-1: Cross sectional comparisons of low income incidence: retired
people, non-retired adults, and workers
|
Year - |
Workers |
Male__________________ |
Female_______________ |
All Not retired |
Retired | |||||
|
Not retired |
Retired |
Workers |
Not retired |
Retired |
Workers | |||||
|
1994 |
13,1% |
16,0% |
34,1% |
11,0% |
18,8% |
29,9% |
12,2% |
17,4% |
31,7% | |
|
1995 |
13,5% |
15,1% |
36,2% |
10,2% |
17,7% |
35,8% |
12,1% |
16,4% |
35,9% | |
|
JZ |
1996 |
12,7% |
15,5% |
32,9% |
12,7% |
18,4% |
33,6% |
12,7% |
17,0% |
33,3% |
|
^co |
1997 |
12,4% |
14,9% |
30,9% |
12,2% |
19,0% |
33,0% |
12,3% |
17,0% |
32,1% |
|
φ |
1998 |
12,8% |
15,8% |
27,8% |
12,8% |
19,2% |
34,2% |
12,8% |
17,5% |
31,4% |
|
CL |
1999 |
14,0% |
16,9% |
30,7% |
10,9% |
18,3% |
33,4% |
12,6% |
17,6% |
32,2% |
|
2000 |
14,0% |
17,0% |
30,5% |
10,2% |
16,8% |
32,6% |
12,3% |
16,9% |
31,6% | |
|
2001 |
12,4% |
16,1% |
32,7% |
9,9% |
17,2% |
35,4% |
11,3% |
16,6% |
34,2% | |
|
1994 |
24,5% |
27,8% |
53,3% |
20,3% |
30,4% |
48,3% |
22,8% |
29,2% |
50,5% | |
|
1995 |
25,4% |
27,8% |
48,7% |
20,5% |
30,3% |
51,0% |
23,4% |
29,1% |
50,0% | |
|
^E |
1996 |
24,2% |
27,9% |
47,0% |
22,1% |
31,2% |
49,1% |
23,3% |
29,6% |
48,2% |
|
^co |
1997 |
23,9% |
27,6% |
47,3% |
21,9% |
31,2% |
49,5% |
23,0% |
29,5% |
48,5% |
|
Φ |
1998 |
24,8% |
28,3% |
42,5% |
22,5% |
31,2% |
50,8% |
23,8% |
29,8% |
47,1% |
|
о |
1999 |
25,6% |
29,2% |
45,8% |
21,0% |
30,8% |
48,0% |
23,6% |
30,0% |
47,0% |
|
2000 |
24,6% |
27,4% |
45,9% |
22,9% |
30,2% |
47,5% |
23,8% |
28,8% |
46,8% | |
|
2001 |
23,6% |
27,3% |
47,5% |
22,6% |
32,1% |
48,2% |
23,1% |
29,8% |
47,9% | |
|
1994 |
14,8% |
17,9% |
38,8% |
12,3% |
20,7% |
33,8% |
13,8% |
19,4% |
36,0% | |
|
1995 |
14,9% |
16,4% |
36,8% |
11,2% |
18,9% |
37,0% |
13,3% |
17,7% |
36,9% | |
|
⊂ |
1996 |
14,4% |
17,4% |
34,8% |
14,0% |
20,1% |
35,3% |
14,2% |
18,8% |
35,1% |
|
ф |
1997 |
13,1% |
15,5% |
31,2% |
12,4% |
19,6% |
33,2% |
12,8% |
17,6% |
32,4% |
|
sp |
1998 |
13,7% |
16,8% |
29,3% |
13,8% |
20,3% |
35,4% |
13,7% |
18,6% |
32,7% |
|
О |
1999 |
12,5% |
15,5% |
28,8% |
9,9% |
16,9% |
31,1% |
11,4% |
16,2% |
30,1% |
|
2000 |
13,3% |
16,1% |
29,6% |
9,3% |
16,1% |
31,1% |
11,5% |
16,1% |
30,5% | |
|
2001 |
10,7% |
14,3% |
27,5% |
8,7% |
14,8% |
31,1% |
9,8% |
14,5% |
29,5% | |
|
1994 |
19,6% |
23,3% |
48,2% |
16,1% |
25,6% |
42,0% |
18,2% |
24,5% |
44,7% | |
|
⊂ |
1995 |
15,8% |
17,7% |
38,2% |
12,0% |
19,9% |
39,3% |
14,2% |
18,9% |
38,8% |
|
^Φ |
1996 |
13,6% |
16,7% |
33,4% |
13,3% |
19,1% |
34,5% |
13,5% |
17,9% |
34,0% |
|
E |
1997 |
11,6% |
13,8% |
29,9% |
11,7% |
17,9% |
31,7% |
11,6% |
15,9% |
30,9% |
|
о |
1998 |
11,4% |
14,1% |
25,6% |
11,6% |
17,3% |
32,8% |
11,5% |
15,7% |
29,6% |
|
sp |
1999 |
9,8% |
12,4% |
23,2% |
7,8% |
13,8% |
25,1% |
9,0% |
13,1% |
24,2% |
|
СО |
2000 |
6,4% |
8,6% |
18,0% |
4,5% |
9,2% |
18,1% |
5,6% |
8,9% |
18,0% |
|
2001 |
6,5% |
9,3% |
18,1% |
5,1% |
9,8% |
17,2% |
5,9% |
9,6% |
17,6% | |
Source: Authors computations based on ECHP.
28
More intriguing information
1. ESTIMATION OF EFFICIENT REGRESSION MODELS FOR APPLIED AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS RESEARCH2. Estimated Open Economy New Keynesian Phillips Curves for the G7
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The Impact of Individual Investment Behavior for Retirement Welfare: Evidence from the United States and Germany
6. Valuing Access to our Public Lands: A Unique Public Good Pricing Experiment
7. Retirement and the Poverty of the Elderly in Portugal
8. Dementia Care Mapping and Patient-Centred Care in Australian residential homes: An economic evaluation of the CARE Study, CHERE Working Paper 2008/4
9. The name is absent
10. CROSS-COMMODITY PERSPECTIVE ON CONTRACTING: EVIDENCE FROM MISSISSIPPI