TABLE 4-3: Cross sectional comparisons of low income incidence for Retired
Individuals by Type of family
|
Year |
____________________Male___________________ |
__________________Female__________________ | |||||||||
|
Retired - |
Retired / |
Retired |
Retired |
Other |
Retired - |
Retired / |
Retired |
Retired |
Other | ||
|
1994 |
55,5% |
25,2% |
37,8% |
25,5% |
23,8% |
45,1% |
29,0% |
32,8% |
19,1% |
18,7% | |
|
1995 |
60,6% |
21,0% |
41,2% |
22,9% |
26,6% |
57,4% |
27,9% |
39,8% |
12,9% |
21,3% | |
|
ʃz |
1996 |
56,2% |
28,7% |
41,2% |
20,3% |
20,5% |
53,2% |
23,2% |
39,6% |
21,1% |
18,5% |
|
ω |
1997 |
56,6% |
46,8% |
38,9% |
16,2% |
18,8% |
54,5% |
24,6% |
38,7% |
13,1% |
21,7% |
|
Φ О Q |
1998 |
47,5% |
29,3% |
33,5% |
11,3% |
30,1% |
55,6% |
33,2% |
36,4% |
11,0% |
27,5% |
|
CL |
1999 |
51,3% |
14,4% |
39,0% |
17,7% |
23,7% |
62,8% |
14,4% |
40,0% |
17,6% |
16,5% |
|
2000 |
45,4% |
8,5% |
47,4% |
10,2% |
25,8% |
59,7% |
17,0% |
46,3% |
7,1% |
20,5% | |
|
2001 |
52,0% |
5,2% |
48,3% |
11,5% |
28,5% |
59,2% |
17,9% |
45,8% |
6,3% |
27,3% | |
|
1994 |
69,3% |
30,8% |
60,8% |
39,2% |
44,0% |
62,0% |
39,7% |
60,3% |
35,2% |
32,5% | |
|
1995 |
65,9% |
40,1% |
54,1% |
37,0% |
39,5% |
76,5% |
30,4% |
55,2% |
28,6% |
36,9% | |
|
"2 |
1996 |
73,4% |
41,6% |
54,7% |
33,3% |
36,5% |
75,3% |
30,2% |
53,0% |
40,0% |
31,3% |
|
"ω |
1997 |
63,8% |
62,5% |
54,4% |
30,7% |
43,9% |
76,8% |
42,9% |
53,6% |
29,7% |
34,5% |
|
φ |
1998 |
55,3% |
46,4% |
53,3% |
24,0% |
39,0% |
79,2% |
43,3% |
54,8% |
28,0% |
38,4% |
|
о |
1999 |
61,2% |
40,4% |
55,7% |
29,6% |
40,9% |
81,5% |
30,6% |
55,8% |
28,8% |
28,1% |
|
2000 |
62,2% |
12,5% |
60,6% |
26,4% |
44,4% |
75,8% |
23,7% |
60,5% |
24,5% |
36,5% | |
|
2001 |
66,7% |
25,6% |
59,9% |
24,9% |
50,7% |
74,3% |
28,7% |
57,7% |
22,8% |
37,9% | |
|
1994 |
57,6% |
27,7% |
44,3% |
28,9% |
26,5% |
47,0% |
32,4% |
40,1% |
21,3% |
21,5% | |
|
1995 |
60,8% |
21,0% |
42,2% |
23,4% |
26,7% |
58,6% |
28,0% |
41,3% |
12,9% |
23,2% | |
|
⊂ |
1996 |
62,7% |
29,5% |
41,8% |
20,8% |
26,0% |
55,5% |
25,5% |
40,7% |
22,2% |
20,5% |
|
ф ∈ |
1997 |
56,6% |
46,8% |
38,9% |
17,2% |
18,9% |
54,6% |
24,6% |
38,7% |
14,4% |
21,8% |
|
sO Os |
1998 |
47,5% |
34,0% |
36,9% |
11,3% |
30,4% |
55,8% |
33,2% |
40,6% |
11,1% |
27,6% |
|
О |
1999 |
49,2% |
12,7% |
36,9% |
16,0% |
21,9% |
56,6% |
13,2% |
38,0% |
16,9% |
16,3% |
|
2000 |
43,0% |
8,5% |
46,3% |
9,5% |
25,8% |
58,1% |
17,0% |
44,9% |
6,9% |
18,0% | |
|
2001 |
47,4% |
5,2% |
42,0% |
7,1% |
23,8% |
54,5% |
13,9% |
41,2% |
4,9% |
22,1% | |
|
1994 |
64,0% |
27,7% |
56,0% |
33,9% |
38,2% |
52,5% |
34,6% |
55,7% |
28,8% |
27,0% | |
|
⊂ |
1995 |
61,6% |
21,0% |
43,8% |
24,8% |
28,0% |
62,1% |
28,0% |
43,5% |
14,9% |
25,7% |
|
ф |
1996 |
56,5% |
28,7% |
41,6% |
20,4% |
22,1% |
53,6% |
25,3% |
40,5% |
21,2% |
19,9% |
|
E |
1997 |
52,8% |
44,7% |
38,0% |
15,5% |
18,1% |
51,0% |
23,8% |
37,6% |
12,4% |
21,7% |
|
Œ> |
1998 |
45,0% |
27,6% |
31,7% |
7,6% |
29,6% |
54,3% |
33,2% |
33,9% |
8,3% |
27,1% |
|
sO Os |
1999 |
41,4% |
12,7% |
30,1% |
10,3% |
19,7% |
46,5% |
12,9% |
29,5% |
10,2% |
14,3% |
|
СО |
2000 |
33,6% |
1,0% |
29,6% |
5,3% |
11,7% |
40,6% |
5,8% |
26,9% |
3,5% |
6,5% |
|
2001 |
34,4% |
3,8% |
27,4% |
4,6% |
15,3% |
31,5% |
11,4% |
23,9% |
1,2% |
9,8% | |
Source: Authors computations based on ECHP.
30
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Modelling the Effects of Public Support to Small Firms in the UK - Paradise Gained?
3. The name is absent
4. Innovation Trajectories in Honduras’ Coffee Value Chain. Public and Private Influence on the Use of New Knowledge and Technology among Coffee Growers
5. CREDIT SCORING, LOAN PRICING, AND FARM BUSINESS PERFORMANCE
6. Modellgestützte Politikberatung im Naturschutz: Zur „optimalen“ Flächennutzung in der Agrarlandschaft des Biosphärenreservates „Mittlere Elbe“
7. The name is absent
8. Knowledge and Learning in Complex Urban Renewal Projects; Towards a Process Design
9. Can a Robot Hear Music? Can a Robot Dance? Can a Robot Tell What it Knows or Intends to Do? Can it Feel Pride or Shame in Company?
10. Reversal of Fortune: Macroeconomic Policy, International Finance, and Banking in Japan