TABLE 4-3: Cross sectional comparisons of low income incidence for Retired
Individuals by Type of family
|
Year |
____________________Male___________________ |
__________________Female__________________ | |||||||||
|
Retired - |
Retired / |
Retired |
Retired |
Other |
Retired - |
Retired / |
Retired |
Retired |
Other | ||
|
1994 |
55,5% |
25,2% |
37,8% |
25,5% |
23,8% |
45,1% |
29,0% |
32,8% |
19,1% |
18,7% | |
|
1995 |
60,6% |
21,0% |
41,2% |
22,9% |
26,6% |
57,4% |
27,9% |
39,8% |
12,9% |
21,3% | |
|
ʃz |
1996 |
56,2% |
28,7% |
41,2% |
20,3% |
20,5% |
53,2% |
23,2% |
39,6% |
21,1% |
18,5% |
|
ω |
1997 |
56,6% |
46,8% |
38,9% |
16,2% |
18,8% |
54,5% |
24,6% |
38,7% |
13,1% |
21,7% |
|
Φ О Q |
1998 |
47,5% |
29,3% |
33,5% |
11,3% |
30,1% |
55,6% |
33,2% |
36,4% |
11,0% |
27,5% |
|
CL |
1999 |
51,3% |
14,4% |
39,0% |
17,7% |
23,7% |
62,8% |
14,4% |
40,0% |
17,6% |
16,5% |
|
2000 |
45,4% |
8,5% |
47,4% |
10,2% |
25,8% |
59,7% |
17,0% |
46,3% |
7,1% |
20,5% | |
|
2001 |
52,0% |
5,2% |
48,3% |
11,5% |
28,5% |
59,2% |
17,9% |
45,8% |
6,3% |
27,3% | |
|
1994 |
69,3% |
30,8% |
60,8% |
39,2% |
44,0% |
62,0% |
39,7% |
60,3% |
35,2% |
32,5% | |
|
1995 |
65,9% |
40,1% |
54,1% |
37,0% |
39,5% |
76,5% |
30,4% |
55,2% |
28,6% |
36,9% | |
|
"2 |
1996 |
73,4% |
41,6% |
54,7% |
33,3% |
36,5% |
75,3% |
30,2% |
53,0% |
40,0% |
31,3% |
|
"ω |
1997 |
63,8% |
62,5% |
54,4% |
30,7% |
43,9% |
76,8% |
42,9% |
53,6% |
29,7% |
34,5% |
|
φ |
1998 |
55,3% |
46,4% |
53,3% |
24,0% |
39,0% |
79,2% |
43,3% |
54,8% |
28,0% |
38,4% |
|
о |
1999 |
61,2% |
40,4% |
55,7% |
29,6% |
40,9% |
81,5% |
30,6% |
55,8% |
28,8% |
28,1% |
|
2000 |
62,2% |
12,5% |
60,6% |
26,4% |
44,4% |
75,8% |
23,7% |
60,5% |
24,5% |
36,5% | |
|
2001 |
66,7% |
25,6% |
59,9% |
24,9% |
50,7% |
74,3% |
28,7% |
57,7% |
22,8% |
37,9% | |
|
1994 |
57,6% |
27,7% |
44,3% |
28,9% |
26,5% |
47,0% |
32,4% |
40,1% |
21,3% |
21,5% | |
|
1995 |
60,8% |
21,0% |
42,2% |
23,4% |
26,7% |
58,6% |
28,0% |
41,3% |
12,9% |
23,2% | |
|
⊂ |
1996 |
62,7% |
29,5% |
41,8% |
20,8% |
26,0% |
55,5% |
25,5% |
40,7% |
22,2% |
20,5% |
|
ф ∈ |
1997 |
56,6% |
46,8% |
38,9% |
17,2% |
18,9% |
54,6% |
24,6% |
38,7% |
14,4% |
21,8% |
|
sO Os |
1998 |
47,5% |
34,0% |
36,9% |
11,3% |
30,4% |
55,8% |
33,2% |
40,6% |
11,1% |
27,6% |
|
О |
1999 |
49,2% |
12,7% |
36,9% |
16,0% |
21,9% |
56,6% |
13,2% |
38,0% |
16,9% |
16,3% |
|
2000 |
43,0% |
8,5% |
46,3% |
9,5% |
25,8% |
58,1% |
17,0% |
44,9% |
6,9% |
18,0% | |
|
2001 |
47,4% |
5,2% |
42,0% |
7,1% |
23,8% |
54,5% |
13,9% |
41,2% |
4,9% |
22,1% | |
|
1994 |
64,0% |
27,7% |
56,0% |
33,9% |
38,2% |
52,5% |
34,6% |
55,7% |
28,8% |
27,0% | |
|
⊂ |
1995 |
61,6% |
21,0% |
43,8% |
24,8% |
28,0% |
62,1% |
28,0% |
43,5% |
14,9% |
25,7% |
|
ф |
1996 |
56,5% |
28,7% |
41,6% |
20,4% |
22,1% |
53,6% |
25,3% |
40,5% |
21,2% |
19,9% |
|
E |
1997 |
52,8% |
44,7% |
38,0% |
15,5% |
18,1% |
51,0% |
23,8% |
37,6% |
12,4% |
21,7% |
|
Œ> |
1998 |
45,0% |
27,6% |
31,7% |
7,6% |
29,6% |
54,3% |
33,2% |
33,9% |
8,3% |
27,1% |
|
sO Os |
1999 |
41,4% |
12,7% |
30,1% |
10,3% |
19,7% |
46,5% |
12,9% |
29,5% |
10,2% |
14,3% |
|
СО |
2000 |
33,6% |
1,0% |
29,6% |
5,3% |
11,7% |
40,6% |
5,8% |
26,9% |
3,5% |
6,5% |
|
2001 |
34,4% |
3,8% |
27,4% |
4,6% |
15,3% |
31,5% |
11,4% |
23,9% |
1,2% |
9,8% | |
Source: Authors computations based on ECHP.
30
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Happiness in Eastern Europe
3. Tariff Escalation and Invasive Species Risk
4. Making International Human Rights Protection More Effective: A Rational-Choice Approach to the Effectiveness of Ius Standi Provisions
5. For Whom is MAI? A theoretical Perspective on Multilateral Agreements on Investments
6. Backpropagation Artificial Neural Network To Detect Hyperthermic Seizures In Rats
7. The name is absent
8. Inflation and Inflation Uncertainty in the Euro Area
9. The role of statin drugs in combating cardiovascular diseases
10. Non Linear Contracting and Endogenous Buyer Power between Manufacturers and Retailers: Empirical Evidence on Food Retailing in France