Retirement and the Poverty of the Elderly in Portugal



TABLE 4-3: Cross sectional comparisons of low income incidence for Retired
Individuals by Type of family

Year

____________________Male___________________

__________________Female__________________

Retired -
alone

Retired /
with
children

Retired
/couple
with no
children

Retired
/couple
with
children

Other

Retired -
alone

Retired /
with
children

Retired
/couple
with no
children

Retired
/couple
with
children

Other

1994

55,5%

25,2%

37,8%

25,5%

23,8%

45,1%

29,0%

32,8%

19,1%

18,7%

1995

60,6%

21,0%

41,2%

22,9%

26,6%

57,4%

27,9%

39,8%

12,9%

21,3%

ʃz
g

1996

56,2%

28,7%

41,2%

20,3%

20,5%

53,2%

23,2%

39,6%

21,1%

18,5%

ω

1997

56,6%

46,8%

38,9%

16,2%

18,8%

54,5%

24,6%

38,7%

13,1%

21,7%

Φ

О

Q

1998

47,5%

29,3%

33,5%

11,3%

30,1%

55,6%

33,2%

36,4%

11,0%

27,5%

CL

1999

51,3%

14,4%

39,0%

17,7%

23,7%

62,8%

14,4%

40,0%

17,6%

16,5%

2000

45,4%

8,5%

47,4%

10,2%

25,8%

59,7%

17,0%

46,3%

7,1%

20,5%

2001

52,0%

5,2%

48,3%

11,5%

28,5%

59,2%

17,9%

45,8%

6,3%

27,3%

1994

69,3%

30,8%

60,8%

39,2%

44,0%

62,0%

39,7%

60,3%

35,2%

32,5%

1995

65,9%

40,1%

54,1%

37,0%

39,5%

76,5%

30,4%

55,2%

28,6%

36,9%

"2

1996

73,4%

41,6%

54,7%

33,3%

36,5%

75,3%

30,2%

53,0%

40,0%

31,3%

1997

63,8%

62,5%

54,4%

30,7%

43,9%

76,8%

42,9%

53,6%

29,7%

34,5%

φ
о

1998

55,3%

46,4%

53,3%

24,0%

39,0%

79,2%

43,3%

54,8%

28,0%

38,4%

о
CL

1999

61,2%

40,4%

55,7%

29,6%

40,9%

81,5%

30,6%

55,8%

28,8%

28,1%

2000

62,2%

12,5%

60,6%

26,4%

44,4%

75,8%

23,7%

60,5%

24,5%

36,5%

2001

66,7%

25,6%

59,9%

24,9%

50,7%

74,3%

28,7%

57,7%

22,8%

37,9%

1994

57,6%

27,7%

44,3%

28,9%

26,5%

47,0%

32,4%

40,1%

21,3%

21,5%

1995

60,8%

21,0%

42,2%

23,4%

26,7%

58,6%

28,0%

41,3%

12,9%

23,2%


га

1996

62,7%

29,5%

41,8%

20,8%

26,0%

55,5%

25,5%

40,7%

22,2%

20,5%

ф

1997

56,6%

46,8%

38,9%

17,2%

18,9%

54,6%

24,6%

38,7%

14,4%

21,8%

sO

Os

1998

47,5%

34,0%

36,9%

11,3%

30,4%

55,8%

33,2%

40,6%

11,1%

27,6%

О
СО

1999

49,2%

12,7%

36,9%

16,0%

21,9%

56,6%

13,2%

38,0%

16,9%

16,3%

2000

43,0%

8,5%

46,3%

9,5%

25,8%

58,1%

17,0%

44,9%

6,9%

18,0%

2001

47,4%

5,2%

42,0%

7,1%

23,8%

54,5%

13,9%

41,2%

4,9%

22,1%

1994

64,0%

27,7%

56,0%

33,9%

38,2%

52,5%

34,6%

55,7%

28,8%

27,0%


га

1995

61,6%

21,0%

43,8%

24,8%

28,0%

62,1%

28,0%

43,5%

14,9%

25,7%

ф

1996

56,5%

28,7%

41,6%

20,4%

22,1%

53,6%

25,3%

40,5%

21,2%

19,9%

E

1997

52,8%

44,7%

38,0%

15,5%

18,1%

51,0%

23,8%

37,6%

12,4%

21,7%

Œ>
σ>
X—

1998

45,0%

27,6%

31,7%

7,6%

29,6%

54,3%

33,2%

33,9%

8,3%

27,1%

sO

Os
СО

1999

41,4%

12,7%

30,1%

10,3%

19,7%

46,5%

12,9%

29,5%

10,2%

14,3%

СО

2000

33,6%

1,0%

29,6%

5,3%

11,7%

40,6%

5,8%

26,9%

3,5%

6,5%

2001

34,4%

3,8%

27,4%

4,6%

15,3%

31,5%

11,4%

23,9%

1,2%

9,8%

Source: Authors computations based on ECHP.

30



More intriguing information

1. INSTITUTIONS AND PRICE TRANSMISSION IN THE VIETNAMESE HOG MARKET
2. The name is absent
3. Does Presenting Patients’ BMI Increase Documentation of Obesity?
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Density Estimation and Combination under Model Ambiguity
7. Incorporating global skills within UK higher education of engineers
8. SLA RESEARCH ON SELF-DIRECTION: THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ISSUES
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent