TABLE 4-3: Cross sectional comparisons of low income incidence for Retired
Individuals by Type of family
Year |
____________________Male___________________ |
__________________Female__________________ | |||||||||
Retired - |
Retired / |
Retired |
Retired |
Other |
Retired - |
Retired / |
Retired |
Retired |
Other | ||
1994 |
55,5% |
25,2% |
37,8% |
25,5% |
23,8% |
45,1% |
29,0% |
32,8% |
19,1% |
18,7% | |
1995 |
60,6% |
21,0% |
41,2% |
22,9% |
26,6% |
57,4% |
27,9% |
39,8% |
12,9% |
21,3% | |
ʃz |
1996 |
56,2% |
28,7% |
41,2% |
20,3% |
20,5% |
53,2% |
23,2% |
39,6% |
21,1% |
18,5% |
ω |
1997 |
56,6% |
46,8% |
38,9% |
16,2% |
18,8% |
54,5% |
24,6% |
38,7% |
13,1% |
21,7% |
Φ О Q |
1998 |
47,5% |
29,3% |
33,5% |
11,3% |
30,1% |
55,6% |
33,2% |
36,4% |
11,0% |
27,5% |
CL |
1999 |
51,3% |
14,4% |
39,0% |
17,7% |
23,7% |
62,8% |
14,4% |
40,0% |
17,6% |
16,5% |
2000 |
45,4% |
8,5% |
47,4% |
10,2% |
25,8% |
59,7% |
17,0% |
46,3% |
7,1% |
20,5% | |
2001 |
52,0% |
5,2% |
48,3% |
11,5% |
28,5% |
59,2% |
17,9% |
45,8% |
6,3% |
27,3% | |
1994 |
69,3% |
30,8% |
60,8% |
39,2% |
44,0% |
62,0% |
39,7% |
60,3% |
35,2% |
32,5% | |
1995 |
65,9% |
40,1% |
54,1% |
37,0% |
39,5% |
76,5% |
30,4% |
55,2% |
28,6% |
36,9% | |
"2 |
1996 |
73,4% |
41,6% |
54,7% |
33,3% |
36,5% |
75,3% |
30,2% |
53,0% |
40,0% |
31,3% |
"ω |
1997 |
63,8% |
62,5% |
54,4% |
30,7% |
43,9% |
76,8% |
42,9% |
53,6% |
29,7% |
34,5% |
φ |
1998 |
55,3% |
46,4% |
53,3% |
24,0% |
39,0% |
79,2% |
43,3% |
54,8% |
28,0% |
38,4% |
о |
1999 |
61,2% |
40,4% |
55,7% |
29,6% |
40,9% |
81,5% |
30,6% |
55,8% |
28,8% |
28,1% |
2000 |
62,2% |
12,5% |
60,6% |
26,4% |
44,4% |
75,8% |
23,7% |
60,5% |
24,5% |
36,5% | |
2001 |
66,7% |
25,6% |
59,9% |
24,9% |
50,7% |
74,3% |
28,7% |
57,7% |
22,8% |
37,9% | |
1994 |
57,6% |
27,7% |
44,3% |
28,9% |
26,5% |
47,0% |
32,4% |
40,1% |
21,3% |
21,5% | |
1995 |
60,8% |
21,0% |
42,2% |
23,4% |
26,7% |
58,6% |
28,0% |
41,3% |
12,9% |
23,2% | |
⊂ |
1996 |
62,7% |
29,5% |
41,8% |
20,8% |
26,0% |
55,5% |
25,5% |
40,7% |
22,2% |
20,5% |
ф ∈ |
1997 |
56,6% |
46,8% |
38,9% |
17,2% |
18,9% |
54,6% |
24,6% |
38,7% |
14,4% |
21,8% |
sO Os |
1998 |
47,5% |
34,0% |
36,9% |
11,3% |
30,4% |
55,8% |
33,2% |
40,6% |
11,1% |
27,6% |
О |
1999 |
49,2% |
12,7% |
36,9% |
16,0% |
21,9% |
56,6% |
13,2% |
38,0% |
16,9% |
16,3% |
2000 |
43,0% |
8,5% |
46,3% |
9,5% |
25,8% |
58,1% |
17,0% |
44,9% |
6,9% |
18,0% | |
2001 |
47,4% |
5,2% |
42,0% |
7,1% |
23,8% |
54,5% |
13,9% |
41,2% |
4,9% |
22,1% | |
1994 |
64,0% |
27,7% |
56,0% |
33,9% |
38,2% |
52,5% |
34,6% |
55,7% |
28,8% |
27,0% | |
⊂ |
1995 |
61,6% |
21,0% |
43,8% |
24,8% |
28,0% |
62,1% |
28,0% |
43,5% |
14,9% |
25,7% |
ф |
1996 |
56,5% |
28,7% |
41,6% |
20,4% |
22,1% |
53,6% |
25,3% |
40,5% |
21,2% |
19,9% |
E |
1997 |
52,8% |
44,7% |
38,0% |
15,5% |
18,1% |
51,0% |
23,8% |
37,6% |
12,4% |
21,7% |
Œ> |
1998 |
45,0% |
27,6% |
31,7% |
7,6% |
29,6% |
54,3% |
33,2% |
33,9% |
8,3% |
27,1% |
sO Os |
1999 |
41,4% |
12,7% |
30,1% |
10,3% |
19,7% |
46,5% |
12,9% |
29,5% |
10,2% |
14,3% |
СО |
2000 |
33,6% |
1,0% |
29,6% |
5,3% |
11,7% |
40,6% |
5,8% |
26,9% |
3,5% |
6,5% |
2001 |
34,4% |
3,8% |
27,4% |
4,6% |
15,3% |
31,5% |
11,4% |
23,9% |
1,2% |
9,8% |
Source: Authors computations based on ECHP.
30