Retirement and the Poverty of the Elderly in Portugal



TABLE 4-3: Cross sectional comparisons of low income incidence for Retired
Individuals by Type of family

Year

____________________Male___________________

__________________Female__________________

Retired -
alone

Retired /
with
children

Retired
/couple
with no
children

Retired
/couple
with
children

Other

Retired -
alone

Retired /
with
children

Retired
/couple
with no
children

Retired
/couple
with
children

Other

1994

55,5%

25,2%

37,8%

25,5%

23,8%

45,1%

29,0%

32,8%

19,1%

18,7%

1995

60,6%

21,0%

41,2%

22,9%

26,6%

57,4%

27,9%

39,8%

12,9%

21,3%

ʃz
g

1996

56,2%

28,7%

41,2%

20,3%

20,5%

53,2%

23,2%

39,6%

21,1%

18,5%

ω

1997

56,6%

46,8%

38,9%

16,2%

18,8%

54,5%

24,6%

38,7%

13,1%

21,7%

Φ

О

Q

1998

47,5%

29,3%

33,5%

11,3%

30,1%

55,6%

33,2%

36,4%

11,0%

27,5%

CL

1999

51,3%

14,4%

39,0%

17,7%

23,7%

62,8%

14,4%

40,0%

17,6%

16,5%

2000

45,4%

8,5%

47,4%

10,2%

25,8%

59,7%

17,0%

46,3%

7,1%

20,5%

2001

52,0%

5,2%

48,3%

11,5%

28,5%

59,2%

17,9%

45,8%

6,3%

27,3%

1994

69,3%

30,8%

60,8%

39,2%

44,0%

62,0%

39,7%

60,3%

35,2%

32,5%

1995

65,9%

40,1%

54,1%

37,0%

39,5%

76,5%

30,4%

55,2%

28,6%

36,9%

"2

1996

73,4%

41,6%

54,7%

33,3%

36,5%

75,3%

30,2%

53,0%

40,0%

31,3%

1997

63,8%

62,5%

54,4%

30,7%

43,9%

76,8%

42,9%

53,6%

29,7%

34,5%

φ
о

1998

55,3%

46,4%

53,3%

24,0%

39,0%

79,2%

43,3%

54,8%

28,0%

38,4%

о
CL

1999

61,2%

40,4%

55,7%

29,6%

40,9%

81,5%

30,6%

55,8%

28,8%

28,1%

2000

62,2%

12,5%

60,6%

26,4%

44,4%

75,8%

23,7%

60,5%

24,5%

36,5%

2001

66,7%

25,6%

59,9%

24,9%

50,7%

74,3%

28,7%

57,7%

22,8%

37,9%

1994

57,6%

27,7%

44,3%

28,9%

26,5%

47,0%

32,4%

40,1%

21,3%

21,5%

1995

60,8%

21,0%

42,2%

23,4%

26,7%

58,6%

28,0%

41,3%

12,9%

23,2%


га

1996

62,7%

29,5%

41,8%

20,8%

26,0%

55,5%

25,5%

40,7%

22,2%

20,5%

ф

1997

56,6%

46,8%

38,9%

17,2%

18,9%

54,6%

24,6%

38,7%

14,4%

21,8%

sO

Os

1998

47,5%

34,0%

36,9%

11,3%

30,4%

55,8%

33,2%

40,6%

11,1%

27,6%

О
СО

1999

49,2%

12,7%

36,9%

16,0%

21,9%

56,6%

13,2%

38,0%

16,9%

16,3%

2000

43,0%

8,5%

46,3%

9,5%

25,8%

58,1%

17,0%

44,9%

6,9%

18,0%

2001

47,4%

5,2%

42,0%

7,1%

23,8%

54,5%

13,9%

41,2%

4,9%

22,1%

1994

64,0%

27,7%

56,0%

33,9%

38,2%

52,5%

34,6%

55,7%

28,8%

27,0%


га

1995

61,6%

21,0%

43,8%

24,8%

28,0%

62,1%

28,0%

43,5%

14,9%

25,7%

ф

1996

56,5%

28,7%

41,6%

20,4%

22,1%

53,6%

25,3%

40,5%

21,2%

19,9%

E

1997

52,8%

44,7%

38,0%

15,5%

18,1%

51,0%

23,8%

37,6%

12,4%

21,7%

Œ>
σ>
X—

1998

45,0%

27,6%

31,7%

7,6%

29,6%

54,3%

33,2%

33,9%

8,3%

27,1%

sO

Os
СО

1999

41,4%

12,7%

30,1%

10,3%

19,7%

46,5%

12,9%

29,5%

10,2%

14,3%

СО

2000

33,6%

1,0%

29,6%

5,3%

11,7%

40,6%

5,8%

26,9%

3,5%

6,5%

2001

34,4%

3,8%

27,4%

4,6%

15,3%

31,5%

11,4%

23,9%

1,2%

9,8%

Source: Authors computations based on ECHP.

30



More intriguing information

1. EU Preferential Partners in Search of New Policy Strategies for Agriculture: The Case of Citrus Sector in Trinidad and Tobago
2. Tariff Escalation and Invasive Species Risk
3. NVESTIGATING LEXICAL ACQUISITION PATTERNS: CONTEXT AND COGNITION
4. Word Sense Disambiguation by Web Mining for Word Co-occurrence Probabilities
5. The name is absent
6. Olive Tree Farming in Jaen: Situation With the New Cap and Comparison With the Province Income Per Capita.
7. Improvement of Access to Data Sets from the Official Statistics
8. CURRENT CHALLENGES FOR AGRICULTURAL POLICY
9. Who runs the IFIs?
10. The name is absent
11. Growth and Technological Leadership in US Industries: A Spatial Econometric Analysis at the State Level, 1963-1997
12. Testing the Information Matrix Equality with Robust Estimators
13. Naïve Bayes vs. Decision Trees vs. Neural Networks in the Classification of Training Web Pages
14. Portuguese Women in Science and Technology (S&T): Some Gender Features Behind MSc. and PhD. Achievement
15. Are class size differences related to pupils’ educational progress and classroom processes? Findings from the Institute of Education Class Size Study of children aged 5-7 Years
16. Geography, Health, and Demo-Economic Development
17. Financial Markets and International Risk Sharing
18. Restricted Export Flexibility and Risk Management with Options and Futures
19. A Location Game On Disjoint Circles
20. The name is absent