Retirement and the Poverty of the Elderly in Portugal



TABLE 4-3: Cross sectional comparisons of low income incidence for Retired
Individuals by Type of family

Year

____________________Male___________________

__________________Female__________________

Retired -
alone

Retired /
with
children

Retired
/couple
with no
children

Retired
/couple
with
children

Other

Retired -
alone

Retired /
with
children

Retired
/couple
with no
children

Retired
/couple
with
children

Other

1994

55,5%

25,2%

37,8%

25,5%

23,8%

45,1%

29,0%

32,8%

19,1%

18,7%

1995

60,6%

21,0%

41,2%

22,9%

26,6%

57,4%

27,9%

39,8%

12,9%

21,3%

ʃz
g

1996

56,2%

28,7%

41,2%

20,3%

20,5%

53,2%

23,2%

39,6%

21,1%

18,5%

ω

1997

56,6%

46,8%

38,9%

16,2%

18,8%

54,5%

24,6%

38,7%

13,1%

21,7%

Φ

О

Q

1998

47,5%

29,3%

33,5%

11,3%

30,1%

55,6%

33,2%

36,4%

11,0%

27,5%

CL

1999

51,3%

14,4%

39,0%

17,7%

23,7%

62,8%

14,4%

40,0%

17,6%

16,5%

2000

45,4%

8,5%

47,4%

10,2%

25,8%

59,7%

17,0%

46,3%

7,1%

20,5%

2001

52,0%

5,2%

48,3%

11,5%

28,5%

59,2%

17,9%

45,8%

6,3%

27,3%

1994

69,3%

30,8%

60,8%

39,2%

44,0%

62,0%

39,7%

60,3%

35,2%

32,5%

1995

65,9%

40,1%

54,1%

37,0%

39,5%

76,5%

30,4%

55,2%

28,6%

36,9%

"2

1996

73,4%

41,6%

54,7%

33,3%

36,5%

75,3%

30,2%

53,0%

40,0%

31,3%

1997

63,8%

62,5%

54,4%

30,7%

43,9%

76,8%

42,9%

53,6%

29,7%

34,5%

φ
о

1998

55,3%

46,4%

53,3%

24,0%

39,0%

79,2%

43,3%

54,8%

28,0%

38,4%

о
CL

1999

61,2%

40,4%

55,7%

29,6%

40,9%

81,5%

30,6%

55,8%

28,8%

28,1%

2000

62,2%

12,5%

60,6%

26,4%

44,4%

75,8%

23,7%

60,5%

24,5%

36,5%

2001

66,7%

25,6%

59,9%

24,9%

50,7%

74,3%

28,7%

57,7%

22,8%

37,9%

1994

57,6%

27,7%

44,3%

28,9%

26,5%

47,0%

32,4%

40,1%

21,3%

21,5%

1995

60,8%

21,0%

42,2%

23,4%

26,7%

58,6%

28,0%

41,3%

12,9%

23,2%


га

1996

62,7%

29,5%

41,8%

20,8%

26,0%

55,5%

25,5%

40,7%

22,2%

20,5%

ф

1997

56,6%

46,8%

38,9%

17,2%

18,9%

54,6%

24,6%

38,7%

14,4%

21,8%

sO

Os

1998

47,5%

34,0%

36,9%

11,3%

30,4%

55,8%

33,2%

40,6%

11,1%

27,6%

О
СО

1999

49,2%

12,7%

36,9%

16,0%

21,9%

56,6%

13,2%

38,0%

16,9%

16,3%

2000

43,0%

8,5%

46,3%

9,5%

25,8%

58,1%

17,0%

44,9%

6,9%

18,0%

2001

47,4%

5,2%

42,0%

7,1%

23,8%

54,5%

13,9%

41,2%

4,9%

22,1%

1994

64,0%

27,7%

56,0%

33,9%

38,2%

52,5%

34,6%

55,7%

28,8%

27,0%


га

1995

61,6%

21,0%

43,8%

24,8%

28,0%

62,1%

28,0%

43,5%

14,9%

25,7%

ф

1996

56,5%

28,7%

41,6%

20,4%

22,1%

53,6%

25,3%

40,5%

21,2%

19,9%

E

1997

52,8%

44,7%

38,0%

15,5%

18,1%

51,0%

23,8%

37,6%

12,4%

21,7%

Œ>
σ>
X—

1998

45,0%

27,6%

31,7%

7,6%

29,6%

54,3%

33,2%

33,9%

8,3%

27,1%

sO

Os
СО

1999

41,4%

12,7%

30,1%

10,3%

19,7%

46,5%

12,9%

29,5%

10,2%

14,3%

СО

2000

33,6%

1,0%

29,6%

5,3%

11,7%

40,6%

5,8%

26,9%

3,5%

6,5%

2001

34,4%

3,8%

27,4%

4,6%

15,3%

31,5%

11,4%

23,9%

1,2%

9,8%

Source: Authors computations based on ECHP.

30



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The name is absent
3. A Multimodal Framework for Computer Mediated Learning: The Reshaping of Curriculum Knowledge and Learning
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Draft of paper published in:
7. FUTURE TRADE RESEARCH AREAS THAT MATTER TO DEVELOPING COUNTRY POLICYMAKERS
8. Word searches: on the use of verbal and non-verbal resources during classroom talk
9. Permanent and Transitory Policy Shocks in an Empirical Macro Model with Asymmetric Information
10. Auctions in an outcome-based payment scheme to reward ecological services in agriculture – Conception, implementation and results