TABLE 4-2: Cross sectional comparisons of low income incidence for Retired
Individuals by Age Cohort
|
Year |
Male |
Female | |||||||
|
Age cohort |
Age cohort | ||||||||
|
<1920 |
1920-1930 |
1930-1940 |
>1940 |
<1920 |
1920-1930 |
1930-1940 |
>1940 | ||
|
1994 |
46,1% |
32,8% |
20,4% |
31,1% |
38,9% |
31,1% |
15,3% |
20,8% | |
|
1995 |
52,5% |
36,7% |
24,3% |
24,3% |
45,9% |
34,4% |
28,9% |
23,1% | |
|
JZ |
1996 |
47,3% |
37,8% |
22,2% |
13,8% |
43,1% |
34,9% |
28,5% |
13,5% |
|
^co |
1997 |
45,3% |
38,0% |
18,9% |
14,1% |
41,8% |
38,3% |
24,5% |
8,7% |
|
φ |
1998 |
40,7% |
32,4% |
24,4% |
8,8% |
42,1% |
37,9% |
29,3% |
16,1% |
|
о |
1999 |
41,1% |
41,9% |
23,1% |
11,1% |
41,3% |
38,7% |
30,5% |
8,2% |
|
2000 |
51,6% |
39,6% |
24,7% |
16,1% |
34,1% |
42,3% |
28,7% |
14,2% | |
|
2001 |
55,7% |
41,2% |
28,8% |
14,5% |
42,2% |
42,1% |
33,6% |
15,1% | |
|
1994 |
62,3% |
53,7% |
44,6% |
40,7% |
54,9% |
49,0% |
38,1% |
40,8% | |
|
1995 |
64,1% |
49,3% |
36,5% |
39,6% |
62,9% |
50,6% |
41,3% |
33,8% | |
|
"Е |
1996 |
59,3% |
55,4% |
35,9% |
21,2% |
56,9% |
52,6% |
43,5% |
24,5% |
|
jyj |
1997 |
61,4% |
55,0% |
37,2% |
22,8% |
55,0% |
55,6% |
42,4% |
25,7% |
|
Ф |
1998 |
59,5% |
50,7% |
35,7% |
17,7% |
58,9% |
56,6% |
44,3% |
27,8% |
|
О |
1999 |
69,8% |
55,9% |
34,1% |
27,2% |
53,5% |
55,7% |
41,5% |
27,6% |
|
2000 |
63,9% |
55,7% |
40,5% |
31,7% |
56,7% |
55,5% |
44,3% |
25,2% | |
|
2001 |
63,0% |
57,7% |
43,1% |
31,2% |
61,5% |
54,3% |
46,0% |
24,5% | |
|
1994 |
47,6% |
40,2% |
24,1% |
35,3% |
40,6% |
35,8% |
21,2% |
23,9% | |
|
1995 |
53,4% |
37,7% |
24,3% |
24,5% |
46,6% |
35,8% |
30,9% |
23,1% | |
|
⊂ |
1996 |
48,5% |
40,3% |
24,4% |
15,3% |
44,9% |
36,4% |
30,6% |
15,0% |
|
Ф |
1997 |
45,3% |
38,6% |
19,0% |
14,1% |
41,8% |
38,8% |
24,7% |
8,7% |
|
C 4o |
1998 |
41,5% |
33,9% |
26,9% |
8,8% |
42,2% |
39,3% |
31,2% |
16,8% |
|
О |
1999 |
39,4% |
38,4% |
22,1% |
10,8% |
40,4% |
35,3% |
29,1% |
6,1% |
|
2000 |
48,4% |
38,8% |
24,4% |
15,3% |
34,0% |
39,6% |
28,1% |
13,0% | |
|
2001 |
40,2% |
37,8% |
23,6% |
11,5% |
34,3% |
39,2% |
28,5% |
12,5% | |
|
1994 |
57,6% |
49,7% |
36,7% |
35,3% |
46,7% |
44,5% |
31,7% |
32,8% | |
|
⊂ |
1995 |
54,0% |
39,3% |
25,7% |
26,9% |
48,9% |
38,8% |
32,7% |
23,5% |
|
^φ |
1996 |
47,4% |
39,1% |
22,3% |
13,8% |
43,4% |
36,0% |
29,5% |
15,0% |
|
E |
1997 |
44,2% |
36,3% |
18,9% |
12,7% |
41,2% |
36,2% |
24,0% |
7,7% |
|
о |
1998 |
39,0% |
28,5% |
23,4% |
7,5% |
41,6% |
35,5% |
28,2% |
16,0% |
|
sp |
1999 |
33,6% |
29,2% |
19,0% |
8,8% |
36,2% |
27,2% |
22,7% |
5,2% |
|
СО |
2000 |
32,5% |
22,8% |
15,4% |
7,6% |
29,0% |
22,8% |
14,2% |
4,9% |
|
2001 |
33,2% |
24,0% |
14,6% |
7,9% |
24,6% |
21,4% |
14,3% |
6,3% | |
Source: Authors computations based on ECHP.
29
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Public-private sector pay differentials in a devolved Scotland
3. Spectral density bandwith choice and prewightening in the estimation of heteroskadasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrices in panel data models
4. Keystone sector methodology:network analysis comparative study
5. The name is absent
6. Who runs the IFIs?
7. The name is absent
8. Firm Creation, Firm Evolution and Clusters in Chile’s Dynamic Wine Sector: Evidence from the Colchagua and Casablanca Regions
9. Insurance within the firm
10. Parent child interaction in Nigerian families: conversation analysis, context and culture