TABLE 4-2: Cross sectional comparisons of low income incidence for Retired
Individuals by Age Cohort
|
Year |
Male |
Female | |||||||
|
Age cohort |
Age cohort | ||||||||
|
<1920 |
1920-1930 |
1930-1940 |
>1940 |
<1920 |
1920-1930 |
1930-1940 |
>1940 | ||
|
1994 |
46,1% |
32,8% |
20,4% |
31,1% |
38,9% |
31,1% |
15,3% |
20,8% | |
|
1995 |
52,5% |
36,7% |
24,3% |
24,3% |
45,9% |
34,4% |
28,9% |
23,1% | |
|
JZ |
1996 |
47,3% |
37,8% |
22,2% |
13,8% |
43,1% |
34,9% |
28,5% |
13,5% |
|
^co |
1997 |
45,3% |
38,0% |
18,9% |
14,1% |
41,8% |
38,3% |
24,5% |
8,7% |
|
φ |
1998 |
40,7% |
32,4% |
24,4% |
8,8% |
42,1% |
37,9% |
29,3% |
16,1% |
|
о |
1999 |
41,1% |
41,9% |
23,1% |
11,1% |
41,3% |
38,7% |
30,5% |
8,2% |
|
2000 |
51,6% |
39,6% |
24,7% |
16,1% |
34,1% |
42,3% |
28,7% |
14,2% | |
|
2001 |
55,7% |
41,2% |
28,8% |
14,5% |
42,2% |
42,1% |
33,6% |
15,1% | |
|
1994 |
62,3% |
53,7% |
44,6% |
40,7% |
54,9% |
49,0% |
38,1% |
40,8% | |
|
1995 |
64,1% |
49,3% |
36,5% |
39,6% |
62,9% |
50,6% |
41,3% |
33,8% | |
|
"Е |
1996 |
59,3% |
55,4% |
35,9% |
21,2% |
56,9% |
52,6% |
43,5% |
24,5% |
|
jyj |
1997 |
61,4% |
55,0% |
37,2% |
22,8% |
55,0% |
55,6% |
42,4% |
25,7% |
|
Ф |
1998 |
59,5% |
50,7% |
35,7% |
17,7% |
58,9% |
56,6% |
44,3% |
27,8% |
|
О |
1999 |
69,8% |
55,9% |
34,1% |
27,2% |
53,5% |
55,7% |
41,5% |
27,6% |
|
2000 |
63,9% |
55,7% |
40,5% |
31,7% |
56,7% |
55,5% |
44,3% |
25,2% | |
|
2001 |
63,0% |
57,7% |
43,1% |
31,2% |
61,5% |
54,3% |
46,0% |
24,5% | |
|
1994 |
47,6% |
40,2% |
24,1% |
35,3% |
40,6% |
35,8% |
21,2% |
23,9% | |
|
1995 |
53,4% |
37,7% |
24,3% |
24,5% |
46,6% |
35,8% |
30,9% |
23,1% | |
|
⊂ |
1996 |
48,5% |
40,3% |
24,4% |
15,3% |
44,9% |
36,4% |
30,6% |
15,0% |
|
Ф |
1997 |
45,3% |
38,6% |
19,0% |
14,1% |
41,8% |
38,8% |
24,7% |
8,7% |
|
C 4o |
1998 |
41,5% |
33,9% |
26,9% |
8,8% |
42,2% |
39,3% |
31,2% |
16,8% |
|
О |
1999 |
39,4% |
38,4% |
22,1% |
10,8% |
40,4% |
35,3% |
29,1% |
6,1% |
|
2000 |
48,4% |
38,8% |
24,4% |
15,3% |
34,0% |
39,6% |
28,1% |
13,0% | |
|
2001 |
40,2% |
37,8% |
23,6% |
11,5% |
34,3% |
39,2% |
28,5% |
12,5% | |
|
1994 |
57,6% |
49,7% |
36,7% |
35,3% |
46,7% |
44,5% |
31,7% |
32,8% | |
|
⊂ |
1995 |
54,0% |
39,3% |
25,7% |
26,9% |
48,9% |
38,8% |
32,7% |
23,5% |
|
^φ |
1996 |
47,4% |
39,1% |
22,3% |
13,8% |
43,4% |
36,0% |
29,5% |
15,0% |
|
E |
1997 |
44,2% |
36,3% |
18,9% |
12,7% |
41,2% |
36,2% |
24,0% |
7,7% |
|
о |
1998 |
39,0% |
28,5% |
23,4% |
7,5% |
41,6% |
35,5% |
28,2% |
16,0% |
|
sp |
1999 |
33,6% |
29,2% |
19,0% |
8,8% |
36,2% |
27,2% |
22,7% |
5,2% |
|
СО |
2000 |
32,5% |
22,8% |
15,4% |
7,6% |
29,0% |
22,8% |
14,2% |
4,9% |
|
2001 |
33,2% |
24,0% |
14,6% |
7,9% |
24,6% |
21,4% |
14,3% |
6,3% | |
Source: Authors computations based on ECHP.
29
More intriguing information
1. How much do Educational Outcomes Matter in OECD Countries?2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Psychological Aspects of Market Crashes
5. The urban sprawl dynamics: does a neural network understand the spatial logic better than a cellular automata?
6. Education as a Moral Concept
7. The Context of Sense and Sensibility
8. Examining Variations of Prominent Features in Genre Classification
9. Integrating the Structural Auction Approach and Traditional Measures of Market Power
10. The name is absent