TABLE 4-2: Cross sectional comparisons of low income incidence for Retired
Individuals by Age Cohort
|
Year |
Male |
Female | |||||||
|
Age cohort |
Age cohort | ||||||||
|
<1920 |
1920-1930 |
1930-1940 |
>1940 |
<1920 |
1920-1930 |
1930-1940 |
>1940 | ||
|
1994 |
46,1% |
32,8% |
20,4% |
31,1% |
38,9% |
31,1% |
15,3% |
20,8% | |
|
1995 |
52,5% |
36,7% |
24,3% |
24,3% |
45,9% |
34,4% |
28,9% |
23,1% | |
|
JZ |
1996 |
47,3% |
37,8% |
22,2% |
13,8% |
43,1% |
34,9% |
28,5% |
13,5% |
|
^co |
1997 |
45,3% |
38,0% |
18,9% |
14,1% |
41,8% |
38,3% |
24,5% |
8,7% |
|
φ |
1998 |
40,7% |
32,4% |
24,4% |
8,8% |
42,1% |
37,9% |
29,3% |
16,1% |
|
о |
1999 |
41,1% |
41,9% |
23,1% |
11,1% |
41,3% |
38,7% |
30,5% |
8,2% |
|
2000 |
51,6% |
39,6% |
24,7% |
16,1% |
34,1% |
42,3% |
28,7% |
14,2% | |
|
2001 |
55,7% |
41,2% |
28,8% |
14,5% |
42,2% |
42,1% |
33,6% |
15,1% | |
|
1994 |
62,3% |
53,7% |
44,6% |
40,7% |
54,9% |
49,0% |
38,1% |
40,8% | |
|
1995 |
64,1% |
49,3% |
36,5% |
39,6% |
62,9% |
50,6% |
41,3% |
33,8% | |
|
"Е |
1996 |
59,3% |
55,4% |
35,9% |
21,2% |
56,9% |
52,6% |
43,5% |
24,5% |
|
jyj |
1997 |
61,4% |
55,0% |
37,2% |
22,8% |
55,0% |
55,6% |
42,4% |
25,7% |
|
Ф |
1998 |
59,5% |
50,7% |
35,7% |
17,7% |
58,9% |
56,6% |
44,3% |
27,8% |
|
О |
1999 |
69,8% |
55,9% |
34,1% |
27,2% |
53,5% |
55,7% |
41,5% |
27,6% |
|
2000 |
63,9% |
55,7% |
40,5% |
31,7% |
56,7% |
55,5% |
44,3% |
25,2% | |
|
2001 |
63,0% |
57,7% |
43,1% |
31,2% |
61,5% |
54,3% |
46,0% |
24,5% | |
|
1994 |
47,6% |
40,2% |
24,1% |
35,3% |
40,6% |
35,8% |
21,2% |
23,9% | |
|
1995 |
53,4% |
37,7% |
24,3% |
24,5% |
46,6% |
35,8% |
30,9% |
23,1% | |
|
⊂ |
1996 |
48,5% |
40,3% |
24,4% |
15,3% |
44,9% |
36,4% |
30,6% |
15,0% |
|
Ф |
1997 |
45,3% |
38,6% |
19,0% |
14,1% |
41,8% |
38,8% |
24,7% |
8,7% |
|
C 4o |
1998 |
41,5% |
33,9% |
26,9% |
8,8% |
42,2% |
39,3% |
31,2% |
16,8% |
|
О |
1999 |
39,4% |
38,4% |
22,1% |
10,8% |
40,4% |
35,3% |
29,1% |
6,1% |
|
2000 |
48,4% |
38,8% |
24,4% |
15,3% |
34,0% |
39,6% |
28,1% |
13,0% | |
|
2001 |
40,2% |
37,8% |
23,6% |
11,5% |
34,3% |
39,2% |
28,5% |
12,5% | |
|
1994 |
57,6% |
49,7% |
36,7% |
35,3% |
46,7% |
44,5% |
31,7% |
32,8% | |
|
⊂ |
1995 |
54,0% |
39,3% |
25,7% |
26,9% |
48,9% |
38,8% |
32,7% |
23,5% |
|
^φ |
1996 |
47,4% |
39,1% |
22,3% |
13,8% |
43,4% |
36,0% |
29,5% |
15,0% |
|
E |
1997 |
44,2% |
36,3% |
18,9% |
12,7% |
41,2% |
36,2% |
24,0% |
7,7% |
|
о |
1998 |
39,0% |
28,5% |
23,4% |
7,5% |
41,6% |
35,5% |
28,2% |
16,0% |
|
sp |
1999 |
33,6% |
29,2% |
19,0% |
8,8% |
36,2% |
27,2% |
22,7% |
5,2% |
|
СО |
2000 |
32,5% |
22,8% |
15,4% |
7,6% |
29,0% |
22,8% |
14,2% |
4,9% |
|
2001 |
33,2% |
24,0% |
14,6% |
7,9% |
24,6% |
21,4% |
14,3% |
6,3% | |
Source: Authors computations based on ECHP.
29
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Strategic Effects and Incentives in Multi-issue Bargaining Games
3. The name is absent
4. SAEA EDITOR'S REPORT, FEBRUARY 1988
5. The name is absent
6. BILL 187 - THE AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYEES PROTECTION ACT: A SPECIAL REPORT
7. Word Sense Disambiguation by Web Mining for Word Co-occurrence Probabilities
8. The Dictator and the Parties A Study on Policy Co-operation in Mineral Economies
9. A Pure Test for the Elasticity of Yield Spreads
10. Real Exchange Rate Misalignment: Prelude to Crisis?