Retirement and the Poverty of the Elderly in Portugal



need less than their full pre-retirement income in order to maintain their living standards.
This is due to three types of reasons. First, the earnings from work are subject to Social
Security payroll taxes. These are not paid in retirement. Additionally, income taxes are
frequently lower. Second, there is no more need to save for retirement. Third, work-related
expenses are much reduced. Munnell and Soto (2005) refer that the studies that have
examined the replacement rate that is needed to maintain previous lifestyle point to 70 to 75
percent of the pre-retirement earnings.

In the second place, appropriate levels of consumption are possible even when income
levels are low. This may be due to the availability of free or nearly free goods/services (like
free health care), and also to the existence of wealth levels resulting from accumulated
savings.

The remainder of the paper starts by setting out the institutional context of retirement in
Portugal, in section 2. Definitions and methodological issues are reported in section 3.
Section 4 provides evidence comparing low income incidence among retired people and the
rest of the population on each of the eight waves of the ECHP for Portugal. Section 5
analyses some factors associated with the changes in the individuals’ economic welfare
over a number of years around retirement. The dynamics of household income changes for
people who retire are studied and the issue of which personal and household characteristics
are associated with a higher risk of having low income in the years around retirement is
explored. In section 6 a multivariate probit model of the probability of entering low income
at the time of retirement conditional on not having a low income before retirement is
estimated. Finally, section 7 concludes and discusses some policy implications of our
findings.

2. The Portuguese Pension System

2.1. Main institutional characteristics

The Portuguese pension system is highly related to the Bismarckian model and can be
characterized as having a predominant first pillar which is divided into three different
provisions: the general scheme for private sector workers (employees and self-employed),



More intriguing information

1. Auction Design without Commitment
2. Economic Evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), CHERE Working Paper 2007/6
3. Conditions for learning: partnerships for engaging secondary pupils with contemporary art.
4. Peer Reviewed, Open Access, Free
5. The name is absent
6. Getting the practical teaching element right: A guide for literacy, numeracy and ESOL teacher educators
7. The name is absent
8. Evaluating Consumer Usage of Nutritional Labeling: The Influence of Socio-Economic Characteristics
9. Education Research Gender, Education and Development - A Partially Annotated and Selective Bibliography
10. Thresholds for Employment and Unemployment - a Spatial Analysis of German Regional Labour Markets 1992-2000
11. Tax Increment Financing for Optimal Open Space Preservation: an Economic Inquiry
12. Party Groups and Policy Positions in the European Parliament
13. On the Desirability of Taxing Charitable Contributions
14. The name is absent
15. The name is absent
16. Shifting Identities and Blurring Boundaries: The Emergence of Third Space Professionals in UK Higher Education
17. INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES
18. Computational Experiments with the Fuzzy Love and Romance
19. Implementation of a 3GPP LTE Turbo Decoder Accelerator on GPU
20. Stakeholder Activism, Managerial Entrenchment, and the Congruence of Interests between Shareholders and Stakeholders