The name is absent



Nixon et al. (January
2006) Interim evaluation
of rehabilitation projects
for families at risk of
losing their homes as
a result of anti-social
behaviour

England


• CommunityZoutreach
worker

• Residential care worker

• Family support workers


• Advocacy

• Counselling (non
specific)

• Support with service
and resource access
(including benefits)

• Parent training

• Skill development
Psychological therapy
(cognitive-behavioural
anger management)

• Personal∕social∕family
support

• Health services (not
psychologyZ counselling)

• Assessment


Impact on user outcomes: (incomplete data )

• threat to home 'stabilised’ for 80% of families (N=45Z56 families)

• improvement in school attendance for 84% (N=31 Z38)

• maintained tenancy or had a 'planned move’ for 95% (N=73Z77)

• stabilisation of complaints for 15% (N=9Z62)

• reduction in level of complaints for 82% (N=50Z62)

Referral agencies perceptions of the impact of the intervention:

"The large majority of referrers viewed the projects in a positive light for a variety of
reasons...Despite the very positive views expressed, some referrers also had reservations
about making a judgement on how successful the projects were in dealing with all types
of families.

"...Some referrers thought that the project didn’t really offer anything new or
different and that similar types of provision is already available, albeit targeted
slightly differently, such as Sure Start and work administered by YOT teams or YISPs.
...Reservations were also expressed as to how successful any one project could be at
addressing long-standing, deep-seated problems that may be at the root of a family’s
behaviour.

...Notwithstanding these reservations, most referral agencies assessed the projects
as being successful at helping to reduce the risk of eviction in the long term... (and)
confirmed that there had been positive outcomes such as reduced complaints of anti-
social behaviour, a stabilisation of the family’s tenancy, improvement in the condition of
a property or improvement in the welfare of the children.”

Families views on the service:

Overwhelmingly, these assessments were positive...Many families felt like they had been
given a new start, given stability and a general feeling of being more in control and
better-able to make decisions and choices. Some also described changes in their family
relationships and the way they communicate with each other.


Appendix 4 Summary of in-depth studies 53




More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The name is absent
3. The Macroeconomic Determinants of Volatility in Precious Metals Markets
4. The name is absent
5. Constrained School Choice
6. Empirically Analyzing the Impacts of U.S. Export Credit Programs on U.S. Agricultural Export Competitiveness
7. Altruism with Social Roots: An Emerging Literature
8. The name is absent
9. Does Competition Increase Economic Efficiency in Swedish County Councils?
10. Integrating the Structural Auction Approach and Traditional Measures of Market Power
11. The name is absent
12. Elicited bid functions in (a)symmetric first-price auctions
13. Change in firm population and spatial variations: The case of Turkey
14. The name is absent
15. The name is absent
16. HOW WILL PRODUCTION, MARKETING, AND CONSUMPTION BE COORDINATED? FROM A FARM ORGANIZATION VIEWPOINT
17. The Economics of Uncovered Interest Parity Condition for Emerging Markets: A Survey
18. The name is absent
19. Labour Market Flexibility and Regional Unemployment Rate Dynamics: Spain (1980-1995)
20. IMMIGRATION POLICY AND THE AGRICULTURAL LABOR MARKET: THE EFFECT ON JOB DURATION