Tables and figures
Table 1 - S&P, Moody’s and Fitch rating systems and linear transformations
Characterization of debt and |
Rating |
Linear | |||
issuer (source: Moody’s) |
transformations | ||||
S&P |
Moody’s |
Fitch |
Scale 21 |
Scale 17 | |
Highest quality |
AAA ~ |
Aaa |
AAA |
21 |
17 |
AA+ |
Aa1 |
AA+ |
20 |
16 | |
High quality ^o |
AA |
Aa2 |
AA |
19 |
15 |
AA- |
Aa3 |
AA- |
18 |
14 | |
^8 Strong payment capacity ∞ |
A+ |
A1 |
A+ |
17 |
13 |
A |
A2 |
A |
16 |
12 | |
A- |
A3 |
A- |
15 |
11 | |
-------------------------- я |
BBB+ |
Baa1 |
BBB+ |
14 |
10 |
Adequate payment capacity |
BBB |
Baa2 |
BBB |
13 |
9 |
BBB- |
Baa3 |
BBB- |
12 |
8 | |
BB+ |
Ba1 |
BB+ |
11 |
7 | |
Likely to fulfil obligations, |
BB |
Ba2 |
BB |
10 |
6 |
BB- |
Ba3 |
BB- |
9 |
5 | |
B+ |
B1 |
B+ |
8 |
4 | |
High credit risk S |
B |
B2 |
B |
7 |
3 |
B- |
B3 |
B- |
6 |
2 | |
O Very high credit risk 3 O |
CCC+ |
Caa 1 |
CCC+ |
5 | |
CCC |
Caa2 |
CCC |
4 | ||
CCC- |
Caa3 |
CCC- |
3 | ||
Near default with possibility |
CC |
Ca |
CC |
2 | |
of recovery |
C |
1 | |||
Sd |
C |
ddd | |||
Default |
D |
dd |
1 | ||
d |
33
More intriguing information
1. Testing for One-Factor Models versus Stochastic Volatility Models2. New issues in Indian macro policy.
3. The name is absent
4. Valuing Access to our Public Lands: A Unique Public Good Pricing Experiment
5. Evaluating the Impact of Health Programmes
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Robust Econometrics
9. The name is absent
10. SOME ISSUES CONCERNING SPECIFICATION AND INTERPRETATION OF OUTDOOR RECREATION DEMAND MODELS