Table 3 - S&P, Moody’s and Fitch rating systems
|
Differences |
S&P- |
S&P- |
Moody's- |
|
6 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
5 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
|
4 |
1 |
0 |
7 |
|
3 |
3 |
1 |
12 |
|
2 |
61 |
13 |
60 |
|
1 |
202 |
128 |
114 |
|
0 |
518 |
487 |
370 |
|
-1 |
161 |
135 |
123 |
|
-2 |
67 |
21 |
46 |
|
-3 |
13 |
4 |
6 |
|
-4 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
|
-5 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
_______-6_______ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Total |
1037 |
791 |
741 |
|
Within 1 * |
85.0% |
94.8% |
81.9% |
|
Within 2 ** |
97.3% |
99.1% |
96.2% |
Notes: * - % of differences in notches within +/- 1 notch.
** - % of differences in notches within +/- 2 notches.
35
More intriguing information
1. Are combination forecasts of S&P 500 volatility statistically superior?2. Connectionism, Analogicity and Mental Content
3. The Role of Immigration in Sustaining the Social Security System: A Political Economy Approach
4. Evidence on the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of Three European Regions
5. Design and investigation of scalable multicast recursive protocols for wired and wireless ad hoc networks
6. Does adult education at upper secondary level influence annual wage earnings?
7. Draft of paper published in:
8. How do investors' expectations drive asset prices?
9. The name is absent
10. Natural hazard mitigation in Southern California