Table 17 - Example of country analysis: variables’ contribution to expected rating changes
17a - European countries
|
_______Portugal_______ |
________Spain________ |
______Greece______ |
____________Italy___________ |
________Ireland________ | |||||||||||
|
1998 2005 |
1998 2005 |
1998 2005 |
1998 2005 |
1998 2005 | |||||||||||
|
⊂ Moody's "≡ S&P Fitch__________________ |
Aa2 (15) Aa2 (15) AA (15) AA- (14) AA (15) AA (15) |
Aa2 (15) Aaa (17) AA (15) AAA (17) AA (15) AAA (17) |
Baa1 (10) A1 (13) BBB (9) A (12) BBB (9) A (12) |
Aa3 (14) Aa2 (15) AA (15) AA- (14) AA- (14) AA (15) |
Aaa (17) Aaa (17) AA+ (16) AAA (17) AAA (17) AAA (17) | ||||||||||
|
Macro contribution |
0.53 |
0.73 |
0.93 |
1.69 |
1.98 |
2.28 |
1.33 |
1.52 |
1.70 |
0.91 |
1.08 |
1.26 |
1.46 |
1.83 |
2.20 |
|
⅛,Gov. contribution о External contribution S European Union_____ |
-0.69 |
-0.46 |
-0.23 |
0.27 |
0.65 |
1.03 |
-0.05 |
-0.01 |
0.02 |
-0.03 |
0.14 |
0.31 |
0.20 |
0.39 |
0.58 |
|
0.09 |
0.12 |
0.15 |
0.22 |
0.31 |
0.39 |
0.18 |
0.24 |
0.31 |
0.17 |
0.24 |
0.30 |
0.15 |
0.21 |
0.26 | |
|
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 | |
|
Overall change_____ |
-0.07 |
0.39 |
0.86 |
2.19 |
2.95 |
3.70 |
1.46 |
1.75 |
2.03 |
1.05 |
1.46 |
1.87 |
1.81 |
2.43 |
3.05 |
|
Macro contribution |
0.42 |
0.57 |
0.73 |
0.94 |
1.07 |
1.20 |
0.99 |
1.13 |
1.27 |
0.56 |
0.67 |
0.77 |
0.91 |
1.15 |
1.38 |
|
Gov. contribution CL £8 External contribution |
-1.06 |
-0.88 |
-0.70 |
0.48 |
0.77 |
1.06 |
-0.13 |
-0.10 |
-0.08 |
0.07 |
0.21 |
0.34 |
0.83 |
0.98 |
1.14 |
|
0.03 |
0.05 |
0.08 |
0.07 |
0.14 |
0.21 |
0.06 |
0.11 |
0.16 |
0.05 |
0.11 |
0.16 |
0.05 |
0.09 |
0.14 | |
|
European Union_____ |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
Overall change_____ |
-0.61 |
-0.25 |
0.11 |
1.49 |
1.98 |
2.47 |
0.91 |
1.14 |
1.36 |
0.69 |
0.98 |
1.26 |
1.78 |
2.22 |
2.66 |
|
Macro contribution |
0.90 |
0.99 |
1.08 |
1.78 |
2.01 |
2.25 |
1.43 |
1.56 |
1.69 |
1.06 |
1.18 |
1.30 |
1.92 |
2.14 |
2.35 |
|
G Gov. contribution |
-1.26 |
-1.05 |
-0.85 |
-0.46 |
-0.13 |
0.19 |
-0.11 |
-0.08 |
-0.06 |
-0.45 |
-0.29 |
-0.14 |
0.15 |
0.31 |
0.47 |
|
-0.06 |
-0.03 |
-0.01 |
-0.16 |
-0.09 |
-0.02 |
-0.13 |
-0.07 |
-0.01 |
-0.12 |
-0.07 |
-0.01 |
-0.11 |
-0.06 |
-0.01 | |
|
European Union_____ |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
__Overall change_____ |
-0.42 |
-0.10 |
0.23 |
1.16 |
1.79 |
2.42 |
1.19 |
1.40 |
1.62 |
0.49 |
0.81 |
1.14 |
1.97 |
2.39 |
2.81 |
17b - European countries
|
Czech Republic |
_____Hungary_____ |
_______Poland______ |
______Slovakia______ |
______Slovenia______ | |||||||||||
|
1998 2005 |
1998 2005 |
1998 2005 |
1998 2005 |
1998 2005 | |||||||||||
|
⊂ Moody's "≡ S&P Fitch____________________ |
Baa1 (10) A1 (13) A- (11) A- (11) BBB+ (10) A (12) |
Baa3 (10) A1 (13) BBB (9) A- (11) BBB (9) BBB+ (10) |
Baa3 (10) A2 (12) BBB- (8) BBB+ (10) BBB+ (10) BBB+ (10) |
Ba1 (7) A2 (12) BB+ (7) A (12) BB+(7) A (12) |
A3 (11) Aa3 (14) A (12) AA- (14) A- (11) AA- (14) | ||||||||||
|
Macro contribution |
1.43 |
1.76 |
2.08 |
2.08 |
2.36 |
2.65 |
0.59 |
0.90 |
1.21 |
1.30 |
1.57 |
1.84 |
1.07 |
1.22 |
1.38 |
|
-^ιGov. contribution о External contribution S European Union_____ |
-0.75 |
-0.59 |
-0.43 |
-0.39 |
-0.29 |
-0.19 |
-0.61 |
-0.42 |
-0.23 |
-0.32 |
-0.11 |
0.10 |
-0.23 |
-0.10 |
0.02 |
|
-0.08 |
-0.05 |
-0.01 |
0.00 |
0.09 |
0.17 |
-0.34 |
-0.23 |
-0.13 |
-0.04 |
0.26 |
0.56 |
0.13 |
0.17 |
0.22 | |
|
1.42 |
1.60 |
1.77 |
1.42 |
1.60 |
1.77 |
1.42 |
1.60 |
1.77 |
1.42 |
1.60 |
1.77 |
1.42 |
1.60 |
1.77 | |
|
Overall change_____ |
2.03 |
2.72 |
3.41 |
3.11 |
3.76 |
4.41 |
1.06 |
1.85 |
2.63 |
2.37 |
3.32 |
4.28 |
2.39 |
2.89 |
3.39 |
|
Macro contribution |
1.24 |
1.46 |
1.68 |
1.48 |
1.69 |
1.89 |
0.86 |
1.03 |
1.19 |
1.23 |
1.39 |
1.55 |
0.76 |
0.87 |
0.99 |
|
Gov. contribution CL £8 External contribution |
-1.05 |
-0.93 |
-0.80 |
-0.25 |
-0.18 |
-0.11 |
-0.63 |
-0.49 |
-0.35 |
-0.45 |
-0.28 |
-0.11 |
-0.18 |
-0.08 |
0.02 |
|
-0.02 |
0.00 |
0.03 |
0.02 |
0.08 |
0.15 |
-0.09 |
-0.01 |
0.07 |
-0.28 |
-0.02 |
0.23 |
0.01 |
0.04 |
0.07 | |
|
European Union_____ |
0.07 |
0.19 |
0.31 |
0.07 |
0.19 |
0.31 |
0.07 |
0.19 |
0.31 |
0.07 |
0.19 |
0.31 |
0.07 |
0.19 |
0.31 |
|
Overall change_____ |
0.23 |
0.73 |
1.22 |
1.31 |
1.77 |
2.24 |
0.20 |
0.72 |
1.23 |
0.58 |
1.28 |
1.97 |
0.66 |
1.02 |
1.38 |
|
Macro contribution |
1.53 |
1.73 |
1.92 |
2.24 |
2.48 |
2.71 |
0.95 |
1.17 |
1.39 |
1.51 |
1.73 |
1.95 |
1.20 |
1.32 |
1.44 |
|
G Gov. contribution |
-0.80 |
-0.67 |
-0.54 |
-0.35 |
-0.27 |
-0.19 |
-0.88 |
-0.72 |
-0.55 |
0.20 |
0.38 |
0.57 |
0.13 |
0.24 |
0.35 |
|
0.05 |
0.10 |
0.15 |
-0.10 |
-0.02 |
0.05 |
0.11 |
0.24 |
0.38 |
0.27 |
0.73 |
1.19 |
-0.08 |
-0.04 |
-0.01 | |
|
European Union_____ |
0.08 |
0.22 |
0.36 |
0.08 |
0.22 |
0.36 |
0.08 |
0.22 |
0.36 |
0.08 |
0.22 |
0.36 |
0.08 |
0.22 |
0.36 |
|
__Overall change_____ |
0.86 |
1.37 |
1.89 |
1.88 |
2.40 |
2.93 |
0.26 |
0.92 |
1.58 |
2.06 |
3.06 |
4.07 |
1.33 |
1.73 |
2.14 |
Notes: The block contributions were calculated using the changes in the variables multiplied by the short-run coefficients estimated by
random effects ordered probit, and then aggregated. The only exception was unemployment, for which we used the long-run coefficient. The
upper and lower bounds where calculated using plus and minus one standard deviation.
$ The quantitative rating scale is in brackets.
50
More intriguing information
1. THE INTERNATIONAL OUTLOOK FOR U.S. TOBACCO2. The name is absent
3. Cultural Neuroeconomics of Intertemporal Choice
4. The name is absent
5. Impact of Ethanol Production on U.S. and Regional Gasoline Prices and On the Profitability of U.S. Oil Refinery Industry
6. The fundamental determinants of financial integration in the European Union
7. The name is absent
8. A Rare Case Of Fallopian Tube Cancer
9. National urban policy responses in the European Union: Towards a European urban policy?
10. Does South Africa Have the Potential and Capacity to Grow at 7 Per Cent?: A Labour Market Perspective