Table 4.1. European trade c. 1790 (£ million)
|
Imports |
Exports |
Re- exports |
Re- exports |
Total |
Share ROW | |||
|
From Europe |
From ROW |
Toward Europe |
Toward ROW |
Toward Europe |
Toward ROW | |||
|
Britain (1784/86) |
11.3 |
11.5 |
6.3 |
7.3 |
2.8 |
0.8 |
40.0 |
49% |
|
France (1787) |
12.8 |
11.7 |
97 |
53 |
60 |
04 |
45.9 |
38% |
|
Netherlands (using |
9.3 |
3.6 |
83 (incl. re-X) |
07 (incl. re-X) |
3.8 (colonial goods) 2.4 (European goods) |
21.9 |
20% | |
|
Spain (1788/92) |
3.6 |
2.0 |
35 |
19 |
1.4 |
2.2 |
19.0 |
36% |
|
Portugal |
4.1 |
2.9 |
1.4 |
1.3 |
3.9 |
1.4 |
15.3 |
35% |
Sources: See Table 4.3 , and Pedreira (1993), Cuenca-Esteban (1989); Marshall (1833)
28
More intriguing information
1. The quick and the dead: when reaction beats intention2. ARE VOLATILITY EXPECTATIONS CHARACTERIZED BY REGIME SHIFTS? EVIDENCE FROM IMPLIED VOLATILITY INDICES
3. The name is absent
4. The Tangible Contribution of R&D Spending Foreign-Owned Plants to a Host Region: a Plant Level Study of the Irish Manufacturing Sector (1980-1996)
5. Ventas callejeras y espacio público: efectos sobre el comercio de Bogotá
6. The Nobel Memorial Prize for Robert F. Engle
7. Brauchen wir ein Konjunkturprogramm?: Kommentar
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Concerns for Equity and the Optimal Co-Payments for Publicly Provided Health Care