Table 4.3. Exports plus imports as share of GDP
|
c. 1655 |
c. 1720 c. 1755 c |
. 1790 |
1820 |
1830 |
1840 |
1850 |
1860 |
1870 | |
|
Austria |
11.4% |
14.2% |
13.2% |
18.7% |
29.0% | ||||
|
Belgium |
19.0% |
26.7% |
31.3% |
35.6% | |||||
|
Denmark |
7.5% |
17.5% |
27.5% |
36.5% |
29.7% |
35.7% | |||
|
Finland |
20.7% |
31.7% | |||||||
|
France |
5.5% 14% |
20% |
9.8% |
8.2% |
10.7% |
13.0% |
20.2% |
23.6% | |
|
Germany |
19.2% |
23.2% |
36.8% | ||||||
|
Greece |
42.7% |
45.6% | |||||||
|
Hungary |
19.4% | ||||||||
|
Italy |
16.1% |
18.3% | |||||||
|
Netherlands |
85% |
82% 84% |
110% |
33.0% |
25.8% |
53.4% |
64.0% |
96.4% |
115.4% |
|
Norway |
33.9% | ||||||||
|
Portugal |
42.4% |
33.9% |
33.7% | ||||||
|
Spain |
16% |
6.0% |
7.3% |
11.2% |
11.7% | ||||
|
Sweden |
5.7% |
6.8% |
13.8% |
20.0% |
29.4% | ||||
|
UK |
19% 20% |
24% |
21.4% |
18.8% |
25.2% |
27.8% |
41.8% |
43.6% | |
|
Best guess at total European trade |
13.4% |
11.4% |
15.4% |
18.0% |
24.9% |
29.9% | |||
|
Idem, net of intra-European trade |
3.8% |
6.3% |
8.9% |
9.2% |
Notes: Ottoman Empire, Albania, Bulgaria, Rumania and Serbia are not included in total Europe. “UK”
pre-1800 is just England and Wales.
Sources: Post-1800: Bairoch (1976), and data underlying Prados de la Escosura (2000). Pre-1800: Deane
and Cole (1962 (1969)), Davis (1969, 1979), Officer (2001), Crafts (1985), Maddison (2001), de Vries and
van der Woude (1997), McCusker (1978), Arnould (1791), Daudin (2005), Marczewski (1961), Prados
de la Escosura (1993).
30
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Understanding the (relative) fall and rise of construction wages
3. The name is absent
4. Existentialism: a Philosophy of Hope or Despair?
5. DISCUSSION: POLICY CONSIDERATIONS OF EMERGING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
6. Bidding for Envy-Freeness: A Procedural Approach to n-Player Fair Division Problems
7. The name is absent
8. Permanent and Transitory Policy Shocks in an Empirical Macro Model with Asymmetric Information
9. The name is absent
10. HOW WILL PRODUCTION, MARKETING, AND CONSUMPTION BE COORDINATED? FROM A FARM ORGANIZATION VIEWPOINT