Table 7: One-Year Transition Matrices for Men and
Women, Earners, 1988-89 and 1991-92
Men
|
1988-89 (Peak) | ||||||
|
1988/1989 |
VL |
L |
LM |
HM |
H |
VH |
|
Very High |
0.29 |
0.43 |
1.28 |
2.59 |
11.64 |
83.77 |
|
High |
0.55 |
0.96 |
3.26 |
16.21 |
64.56 |
14.46 |
|
High Middle |
1.50 |
2.59 |
13.72 |
63.68 |
15.87 |
2.65 |
|
Low Middle |
4.91 |
11.53 |
56.65 |
22.00 |
3.74 |
1.16 |
|
Low |
16.54 |
39.59 |
33.82 |
7.74 |
1.62 |
0.69 |
|
Very Low |
40.25 |
30.61 |
22.47 |
5.08 |
1.11 |
0.49 |
|
1991-92 (Trough) | ||||||
|
1991/1992 |
VL |
L |
LM |
HM |
H |
VH |
|
Very High |
0.40 |
0.62 |
1.66 |
2.85 |
8.97 |
85.49 |
|
High |
0.85 |
1.35 |
4.12 |
13.25 |
65.32 |
15.12 |
|
High Middle |
2.14 |
3.45 |
14.23 |
62.12 |
15.94 |
2.13 |
|
Low Middle |
7.06 |
14.11 |
56.54 |
18.54 |
2.83 |
0.93 |
|
Low |
19.63 |
42.54 |
29.85 |
6.19 |
1.29 |
0.49 |
|
Very Low |
46.14 |
29.58 |
19.07 |
3.99 |
0.84 |
0.38 |
|
Women | ||||||
|
1988-89 (Peak) | ||||||
|
1988/1989 |
VL |
L |
LM |
HM |
H |
VH |
|
Very High |
0.39 |
0.49 |
1.68 |
4.44 |
14.17 |
78.83 |
|
High |
0.52 |
0.94 |
4.21 |
17.80 |
66.96 |
9.58 |
|
High Middle |
1.34 |
2.25 |
15.76 |
70.45 |
9.20 |
1.00 |
|
Low Middle |
4.64 |
11.04 |
68.38 |
14.62 |
1.09 |
0.23 |
|
Low |
17.73 |
48.57 |
29.99 |
3.19 |
0.41 |
0.11 |
|
Very Low |
52.21 |
31.19 |
14.74 |
1.53 |
0.27 |
0.07 |
|
1991-92 (Tro∙ugh) | ||||||
|
1991/1992 |
VL |
L |
LM |
HM |
H |
VH |
|
Very High |
0.34 |
0.54 |
1.69 |
3.55 |
10.00 |
83.89 |
|
High |
0.62 |
0.96 |
4.41 |
12.85 |
67.10 |
14.06 |
|
High Middle |
1.40 |
2.67 |
13.26 |
71.08 |
10.50 |
1.09 |
|
Low Middle |
5.60 |
12.18 |
65.61 |
14.96 |
1.35 |
0.30 |
|
Low |
20.18 |
49.78 |
26.23 |
3.32 |
0.37 |
0.11 |
|
Very Low |
55.68 |
29.38 |
12.98 |
1.66 |
0.22 |
0.09 |
470
Charles M. Beach and Ross Finnie
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources
4. Distribution of aggregate income in Portugal from 1995 to 2000 within a SAM (Social Accounting Matrix) framework. Modeling the household sector
5. Disentangling the Sources of Pro-social Behavior in the Workplace: A Field Experiment
6. The Prohibition of the Proposed Springer-ProSiebenSat.1-Merger: How much Economics in German Merger Control?
7. Spatial agglomeration and business groups: new evidence from Italian industrial districts
8. The Triangular Relationship between the Commission, NRAs and National Courts Revisited
9. The open method of co-ordination: Some remarks regarding old-age security within an enlarged European Union
10. LIMITS OF PUBLIC POLICY EDUCATION