The Impact of EU Accession in Romania: An Analysis of Regional Development Policy Effects by a Multiregional I-O Model



because fiscal problems have caused a decline in public expenditure and, in turn, a decrease in
investments in public infrastructure which has made the degree of attractiveness still lower.

Another peculiarity of regional development in Romania is the coexistence of areas of different
levels of development within the single regions and the scarce economic integration among the sub-
regional areas. In fact, despite a dense urban network, there are few and insufficient links among urban
centres and the surrounding areas. In addition, the system of local transport appears to be extremely
inadequate to establish and maintain foreign contacts and economic relationships between counties.
This implies that the closure of the only company in a given county generally leads to migration to
rural areas or to Bucharest and not to other urban centres located in the same region, causing an urban
decline of small and medium size towns.

A last remarkable characteristic of regional development is the presence of a high number of
localities having an only one economic activity, generally a State-owned company, likely to undergo
restructuring and concentrating a disproportionate share of non-agricultural employment. It is evident
that this situation is highly critical for the serious consequences which labour market shocks could
produce in the future.

Table 2. Some geographic and socio-economic indicators about the Romanian NUTS-2 level
development regions.___________________________________________________________________________

Regions

Area
(km2)

%

GDP
(billion lei, 1998)

%

Population
(inhabitants, 2000)

%

GDP per capita
__________
(million lei)

NER

36,850

15.5

50,385.4

13.5

3,823,492

17.0

13.2

SER

35,762

15.0

48,959.2

13.1

2,934.319

13.1

16.7

SR

34,453

14.5

49,675.0

13.3

3,465.468

15.4

14.3

SWR

29,212

12.3

36,101.5

9.7

2,399.831

10.7

15.0

WR

32,034

13.4

34,377.8

9.2

2,041.129

9.1

16.8

NWR

34,159

14.3

45,320.3

12.1

2,844.042

12.7

15.9

CR

34,100

14.3

46,683.1

12.5

2,642.242

11.8

17.7

BR

1,821

0.8

61,784.5

16.6

2,284.682

10.2

27.0

Romania

238,391

100.0

373,286.8

100.0

22,435,205

100.0

16.6

Source: Author’s elaboration on data from Romania National Institute of Statistics



More intriguing information

1. A Consistent Nonparametric Test for Causality in Quantile
2. Foreign Direct Investment and Unequal Regional Economic Growth in China
3. Climate change, mitigation and adaptation: the case of the Murray–Darling Basin in Australia
4. The name is absent
5. Synthesis and biological activity of α-galactosyl ceramide KRN7000 and galactosyl (α1→2) galactosyl ceramide
6. DISCRIMINATORY APPROACH TO AUDITORY STIMULI IN GUINEA FOWL (NUMIDA MELEAGRIS) AFTER HYPERSTRIATAL∕HIPPOCAMP- AL BRAIN DAMAGE
7. Perceived Market Risks and Strategic Risk Management of Food Manufactures: Empirical Results from the German Brewing Industry
8. Distribution of aggregate income in Portugal from 1995 to 2000 within a SAM (Social Accounting Matrix) framework. Modeling the household sector
9. THE MEXICAN HOG INDUSTRY: MOVING BEYOND 2003
10. The name is absent