196 H. Mori et al. / International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 3 (2000) 189-205
(A) Age

(B) Cohort
1985-89
(C) Period
E
о
СП
1975-79 -
1965-69 -
1955-59 -
1945-49 -
1935-39 --
1925-29 -
1915-19 -
<1909 -z

-8
0
8
16
-16

Fig. 1. Estimates of age, cohort and period effects for rice.
less beef than older ones (again, at-home only). In sharp contrast with rice described above,
those cohorts born before World War II are found to have inclination to consume less than
those born after the war. Additionally, there is a strong trend of increasing consumption due
to period effects. Thus, as those cohorts that are in the lower consumption stages of their age
More intriguing information
1. Voluntary Teaming and Effort2. The name is absent
3. Sex-gender-sexuality: how sex, gender, and sexuality constellations are constituted in secondary schools
4. Fiscal Policy Rules in Practice
5. Reform of the EU Sugar Regime: Impacts on Sugar Production in Ireland
6. Commuting in multinodal urban systems: An empirical comparison of three alternative models
7. Public-private sector pay differentials in a devolved Scotland
8. Evidence of coevolution in multi-objective evolutionary algorithms
9. THE ANDEAN PRICE BAND SYSTEM: EFFECTS ON PRICES, PROTECTION AND PRODUCER WELFARE
10. The growing importance of risk in financial regulation