although in this year dry land farming area is smaller than in 1994 and irrigated farming area in
1999 is clearly superior to the 1994 one.
Figure 4. Survey Agrarian Work Unit comparison with income per capita
■ Survey ■ One IncomeZcapita □ Doubled IncomeZcapita □ Tripled IncomeZcapita □ Quadrupoled IncomeZcapita
4000
500 I ■
Figure 5. Survey economic variables comparison with income per capita in 1994
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
I limn
Subsidies
(EurosZHa)
Total Revenue
(EurosZHa)
Subsidies
(EurosZHa)
Total Revenue
(EurosZHa)
Direct Gross
Margin
(EurosZHa)
Direct Gross
Margin
(EurosZHa)
Total
Expenditure
(EurosZHa)
Total
Expenditure
(EurosZHa)
DRY LAND 1994
IRRIGATED LAND 1994
IO Survey □ One IncomeZcapita □ Doubled IncomeZcapita M Tripled IncomeZcapita M Quadrupoled IncomeZcapita ∣
19
More intriguing information
1. La mobilité de la main-d'œuvre en Europe : le rôle des caractéristiques individuelles et de l'hétérogénéité entre pays2. Empirical Calibration of a Least-Cost Conservation Reserve Program
3. The name is absent
4. EU Preferential Partners in Search of New Policy Strategies for Agriculture: The Case of Citrus Sector in Trinidad and Tobago
5. Telecommuting and environmental policy - lessons from the Ecommute program
6. Banking Supervision in Integrated Financial Markets: Implications for the EU
7. A production model and maintenance planning model for the process industry
8. The name is absent
9. Are Public Investment Efficient in Creating Capital Stocks in Developing Countries?
10. The name is absent