Økonomisk teorihistorie - Overflødig information eller brugbar ballast?

Litteratur

[1] Addison et al. (1984): “Causation, Social Science and Sir John Hicks”, Ox-
ford Economic Papers, 1984, pp. 1-11.

[2] Beed, Clive (1991): “Philosophy of science and contemporary economics:
an overview”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 1991, pp. 459-94.

[3] Blanchard, Oliver (2000): “What do we know about macroeconomics that
Fischer and Wicksell did not?”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 2000,
pp. 1375-1409.

[4] Blaug, Mark (2001): “No History of Ideas, Please, We’re Economists”,
Journal of Economic Perspectives, Winter 2001, pp. 145-64.

[5] Blaug, Mark (1994): “The Methodology of Economics. Or How Econo-
mists explain”, Cambridge University Press 1994.

[6] Blaug, Mark (1990): “John Hicks and the methodology of economics” fra
bogen “Economic Theories, True or False? Essays in the History and
Methodology of Economics”, Edward Elgar 1990, pp. 107-18.

[7] Boland, Lawrence (1987): “Methodology”, The New Palgrave: A Diction-
ary of Economics, London 1987, pp. 455-58.

[8] Boulding, Kenneth (1971): “After Samuelson, Who Needs Adam Smith?”,
History of Political Economy 1971, pp. 225-37.

[9] Estrup, Hector (2001): “Anmeldelse af H. P. Perregaards 0konomisk Teo-
rihistorie ”, National0konomisk Tidsskrift 2001, pp. 323-26.

[10] Foss, Nicolai Juul (1994): “Keynes og Hayek i et historisk perspektiv”,
Samfunds0konomen 1994:6, pp. 43-47.

19

<<   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   >>

More intriguing information