The name is absent

35

Date

2.11.79

1.10(ii)

зі

SS2

Well I think this morning again it's too big that

group altogether.

I think we should have kept on as

we were prior to the coffee break when we were having
a lot better discussion.

E3

I think we try to discuss too much.

SS3

..... we were divided by subjects so it was
interesting for us lot who have been doing remedial
reading to hear about, you know, the other side of it

which was

sorry, no topics, this morning we were doing

remedial and other groups were doing so-called troublesome
children so it was interesting.

E2

It's learning about different schools, which is
a good idea, I mean, unfortunately the discussion this
morning was better when it was just two schools together
rather than four.

SS3

But, yeah, I think that they could have done with
splitting so that they would have had two groups
but with components from each school within those
two groups and so you would have got the four

schools .

That was very interesting, to see the

four schools' standpoints.

E2

Well

I think there's a problem there

Ml

31

Date

2.11.79

1.10(iii)

32

SS2

child.

Is

I mean on

it the school or the child who should
that level* I find it quite interesting

SS2

SS3