I 192
Annex 2.1
Societal and Linguistic Goals and their Relation to Educational Policies
(from Phlllipson, Skutnabb-Kangas and Africa, 1986:80)
Prograntmes | |||||||
Segregation |
Maintenance HDS |
Submersion |
Immersion | ||||
Dominant medium |
Ll |
I |
L2 | ||||
Africa |
Europe |
Asia |
EuropeZUSA |
Afnca |
Europe |
North Amencs | |
Linguisticgoal Societal goal |
Dominance Apartheid |
Dominance Repatriation |
Bilingualism Bilingualism Equity and Integration |
Elites: L2 |
Dominance Assimilation, |
Bilingualism Ling, and cult, | |
MajorityZMinority |
Majority |
Minority |
Majority |
Minority |
Majority |
Minority |
Majority |
Status of group Group has been (C) Language of group L2 official L2 standardized and |
Low C+ + + |
Low + |
High C + |
Low C + |
High C + |
Low CZ- + |
High + |
Note: LDS =Low Degree of Success. HDS = High Degree of Success.
More intriguing information
1. Financial Market Volatility and Primary Placements2. Group cooperation, inclusion and disaffected pupils: some responses to informal learning in the music classroom
3. Neighborhood Effects, Public Housing and Unemployment in France
4. The name is absent
5. Monetary Policy News and Exchange Rate Responses: Do Only Surprises Matter?
6. TOWARD CULTURAL ONCOLOGY: THE EVOLUTIONARY INFORMATION DYNAMICS OF CANCER
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The Dynamic Cost of the Draft