IMPLICATIONS OF CHANGING AID PROGRAMS TO U.S. AGRICULTURE



Table 1. Compound Annual Growth Rates for Crop Output and
Population and Change in Crop Output per Person, Selected Countries

Region and
Country

Crop
Output,
1948-63i

Population,
1950-60-'

Changes in
Crop Output
per Person

Percent

Percent

Percent

Latin America

Argentina

2.8

1.7

1.1

Brazil

4.2

3.1

1.1

Chile

2.8

2.5

.3

Colombia

2.6

2.2

.4

Costa Rica

5.6

2.3

3.2

Mexico

6.3

3.1

3.1

Venezuela

4.5

4.0

.5

Near East and South Asia

Egypt

2.0

2.4

— .4

Greece

3.7

1.0

2.7

India

3.1

2.0

1.1

Iran

3.6

2.2

1.4

Israel

9.7

5.2

4.3

Jordan3

— 1.9

2.6

— 4.5

Pakistan1

1.8

2.2

— .6

Turkey

4.5

2.9

1.6

Far East

Japan

2.8

1.2

1.6

Philippines

5.2

3.2

2.0

Taiwan

4.5

3.4

1.1

Thailand

4.4

3.2

1.2

Europe

Poland

3.0

1.8

1.2

Spain

2.7

.8

1.9

Yugoslavia

5.1

1.1

4.0

Africa

Nigeria

2.6

3.7

— 1.1

Sudan

8.0

3.4

4.4

Tanganyika

5.2

1.8

3.3

Tunisia

1.6

1.8

— .2

1 Estimates by Economic Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture.

2 From United Nations, Compendium of Social Statistics, 1963, Series K, No. 2,
Table 1, pp. 22-30, except estimate for Israel is from Y. Mundlak,
Long-Term
Projections of Supply and Demand for Agricultural Products in Israel,
Falk Project
for Economic Research in Israel, Ierusalem, May 1964, p. 204.

3Wheat crop failure in recent years accounts for low growth rate for crop output.

4Pakistan has had a marked increase in crop output during the last two years.

These growth rates are much larger than those achieved in the
United States, Canada, and West European countries during early
periods of their development. In the United States, for example,
total farm output increased only 2.2 percent a year during the period

70



More intriguing information

1. Trade Openness and Volatility
2. KNOWLEDGE EVOLUTION
3. BARRIERS TO EFFICIENCY AND THE PRIVATIZATION OF TOWNSHIP-VILLAGE ENTERPRISES
4. Testing Panel Data Regression Models with Spatial Error Correlation
5. Competition In or For the Field: Which is Better
6. The name is absent
7. The Tangible Contribution of R&D Spending Foreign-Owned Plants to a Host Region: a Plant Level Study of the Irish Manufacturing Sector (1980-1996)
8. HACCP AND MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION
9. The name is absent
10. Social Cohesion as a Real-life Phenomenon: Exploring the Validity of the Universalist and Particularist Perspectives