noted that some !earners put more emphasis on some of the three aspects of their selves
than on others. Some even showed, or expressed, their problem about finding elements
for one of the selves.
Five different tendencies were found among the participants of the study. The
first one is represented by Ga. Her account of her selves is very even, the three lists were
similar in length. Besides, she showed that she had a lot to say about herself. If we
translate her three lists into a figure we visualise it as the following:


-1 am short
-1 feel awkward in new
places
-1 feel nervous in exams
• 1 repeat my mistakes
• I am extrovert
-Iadapt according to
the situation
-1 know that I learn
by making mistakes
- Hike to communicate
-be taller!
- Feel relaxed in a new place
- Try to remember everything/
understand what I read
- Don’t be nervous in an exam/
don’t feel frustrated
Fig. 6.1 Ga according to her selves
Although in itself, Fig. 6.1 does not say a lot, the reader will realise the difference when
comparing it with the ones in the following paragraphs.
T, another participant, did not have problems when filling his self-lists. The
difference is that his information tended to be more on the left side, that is, related to his
perceived self. He was very aware of this. He commented:
T: I am more aware of my shortcomings than of my ideal self
And the following represents his three selves:
154
More intriguing information
1. Picture recognition in animals and humans2. Endogenous Heterogeneity in Strategic Models: Symmetry-breaking via Strategic Substitutes and Nonconcavities
3. Influence of Mucilage Viscosity On The Globule Structure And Stability Of Certain Starch Emulsions
4. The Value of Cultural Heritage Sites in Armenia: Evidence From a Travel Cost Method Study
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Placentophagia in Nonpregnant Nulliparous Mice: A Genetic Investigation1
9. The name is absent
10. Skills, Partnerships and Tenancy in Sri Lankan Rice Farms