SLA RESEARCH ON SELF-DIRECTION: THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ISSUES



This is an extract from my own participation in a group discussion when the
participants and I were analysing the role of counselling. When listening to the tapes, I
found myself openly expressing my own views about SAC matters. This is just a sample
of how I conveyed my ideas. A second reading would reveal a lot about my beliefs.
Actually, it is amazing the amount of beliefs one can find in a fourteen-line paragraph.
As I see it, there is:

1) a belief that SAC is not Workingfor most of the learners

2) a belief that there are different types of SAC users

3) a belief that learner∕counsellor interaction is very superficial

4) a belief that the learners that contact a counsellor believe in her
capacity

5) a belief that the learners that contact a counsellor can openly address
their failures

6) a belief that there is no communication between counsellor and user

7) a belief that the counsellor is not able to cope with the situation

8) a belief that there is a negative attitude in the counsellor

9) a belief that there is unawareness of 7 and 8

I am not going to reflect on all of these beliefs. Doing so would be a mere
repetition of several sections of this thesis. However, I would like to specifically reflect
on two general points: What I believe about SAC learners and what I think of
counsellors.

7.3.1. Beliefs concerning different types of SAC learners

My experience in working in the SAC Oaxaca for five years has shown me that there are
different types of learners. Basically when I say “Most SAC users are here for two
reasons” I am dividing the population of SAC into three separate groups: a) the hopeful
new ones, b) the too-proud-to-leave old users and c) the few who are not included in the
“most”. The first group has two possibilities, either leave within the first two to six
months of SAC work or find a place in groups b) or c). Group b) is made up of all the
SAC users who are struggling to Ieam a language in a self-directed way but have not
made progress, at least not in relation to the effort and time they have invested in it. This
type of learner has up and down motivational cycles that keep them trying. A good
example is A:

C: Have you ever thought about dropping out?

A: Yes several times, when I become really bored and disappointed
about my progress. Then I happen to go to the USA and I realise that I
need to Ieam English. I come back very motivated and willing to work harder.

Group c) is formed by the learners I am not referring to in the quotation. That is

237



More intriguing information

1. The effect of classroom diversity on tolerance and participation in England, Sweden and Germany
2. The Employment Impact of Differences in Dmand and Production
3. Cross-Country Evidence on the Link between the Level of Infrastructure and Capital Inflows
4. Restricted Export Flexibility and Risk Management with Options and Futures
5. PER UNIT COSTS TO OWN AND OPERATE FARM MACHINERY
6. Multimedia as a Cognitive Tool
7. Constrained School Choice
8. The Functions of Postpartum Depression
9. EXPANDING HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE U.K: FROM ‘SYSTEM SLOWDOWN’ TO ‘SYSTEM ACCELERATION’
10. Do Decision Makers' Debt-risk Attitudes Affect the Agency Costs of Debt?
11. The name is absent
12. Cyber-pharmacies and emerging concerns on marketing drugs Online
13. MULTIPLE COMPARISONS WITH THE BEST: BAYESIAN PRECISION MEASURES OF EFFICIENCY RANKINGS
14. A Theoretical Growth Model for Ireland
15. The name is absent
16. Financial Market Volatility and Primary Placements
17. The name is absent
18. AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF COTTON AND PEANUT RESEARCH IN SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
19. I nnovative Surgical Technique in the Management of Vallecular Cyst
20. Der Einfluß der Direktdemokratie auf die Sozialpolitik