Large-N and Large-T Properties of Panel Data Estimators and the Hausman Test



for some constant M2 . By Assumptions 2 and 6(i), for t = [Tr] and finite
constant
M2 , we have


sup sup E kD1Tx1,itk4
i,T 1tT

sup sup M3 (∣∣D1TIl4E ∣∣(xι,it
i,T
1tT

sup sup τ1 (r) Θ1,i 4 .

i r[0,1]


Ex1,it)k4+ kD1TEx1,itk4


Next, similarly, by Assumptions 3(ii) and (iii),

sup sup E x2,it 4 sup sup M3 Ex2,it

i,T 1tT                 i,T 1tT

< ,


Ex2,itk4+kEx2,itk4


and by Assumptions 4(ii) and (iii) and 6(iii) and (iv),


sup sup Ekx3,itk4  

i,T 1tT


sup
i,T


sup M3 E °x3,it - EFzi x3,it°4 + Ex3,it4

1tT                       i


Therefore,


sup sup
i,T 1tT

which yields (83). ¥

Part (c)

By Lemma 16(a). ¥

Part (d)

By Lemma 16(d). ¥


M2


.


E (suΡi,t °x3,it - EFzi x3,it°4)
+ supi,t E ° ° EFzi x3,it - Ex3,it°4
+ supi,t Ex3,it 4


kGx,T (xit
t


Xi)k2


2<M,


Proof of Lemma 3

By Lemma 16(c). ¥

Proof of Lemma 4

Write

., Pi Dtwii=N Pi D


Twei


(ui


Ef.Ui) + (N Pi DT⅛W,'DT) λ.   (85)


Notice that by Assumption 10,

∣Ef  ɪ P

Fw ° N


i DT wei (ui


EFwui)


2 σ2       1

) = NutrE\N Pi DtυjiWj0 DTJ


54




More intriguing information

1. Endogenous Heterogeneity in Strategic Models: Symmetry-breaking via Strategic Substitutes and Nonconcavities
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Computing optimal sampling designs for two-stage studies
8. The name is absent
9. Fighting windmills? EU industrial interests and global climate negotiations
10. On Social and Market Sanctions in Deterring non Compliance in Pollution Standards