for some constant M2 < ∞. By Assumptions 2 and 6(i), for t = [Tr] and finite
constant M2 , we have
sup sup E kD1Tx1,itk4
i,T 1≤t≤T
≤ sup sup M3 (∣∣D1TIl4E ∣∣(xι,it
i,T 1≤t≤T
→ sup sup ∣τ1 (r) Θ1,i ∣4 < ∞.
i r∈[0,1]
Ex1,it)k4+ kD1TEx1,itk4
Next, similarly, by Assumptions 3(ii) and (iii),
sup sup E ∣x2,it ∣4 ≤ sup sup M3 E∣x2,it
i,T 1≤t≤T i,T 1≤t≤T
< ∞,
Ex2,itk4+kEx2,itk4
and by Assumptions 4(ii) and (iii) and 6(iii) and (iv),
sup sup Ekx3,itk4 ≤
i,T 1≤t≤T
sup
i,T
sup M3 E °x3,it - EFzi x3,it°4 + ∣Ex3,it∣4
1≤t≤T i
Therefore,
sup sup
i,T 1≤t≤T
which yields (83). ¥
Part (c)
By Lemma 16(a). ¥
Part (d)
By Lemma 16(d). ¥
M2
∞.
E (suΡi,t °x3,it - EFzi x3,it°4)
+ supi,t E ° ° EFzi x3,it - Ex3,it°4
+ supi,t ∣Ex3,it ∣4
kGx,T (xit
t
Xi)k2
2<M,
Proof of Lemma 3
By Lemma 16(c). ¥
Proof of Lemma 4
Write
., Pi Dtwi≈i=N Pi D
Twei
(ui
Ef.Ui) + (N Pi DT⅛W,'DT) λ. (85)
Notice that by Assumption 10,
∣Ef ɪ P
Fw ° N
i DT wei (ui
EFwui)
2 σ2 1
) = NutrE\N Pi DtυjiWj0 DTJ ■
54
More intriguing information
1. THE MEXICAN HOG INDUSTRY: MOVING BEYOND 20032. The name is absent
3. Lumpy Investment, Sectoral Propagation, and Business Cycles
4. Automatic Dream Sentiment Analysis
5. Migration and employment status during the turbulent nineties in Sweden
6. The name is absent
7. Stable Distributions
8. Disturbing the fiscal theory of the price level: Can it fit the eu-15?
9. ‘I’m so much more myself now, coming back to work’ - working class mothers, paid work and childcare.
10. The name is absent