Notice that by Lemmas 2 and 4, under the fixed effect assumption (Assumption
10), the first term of (92) is
θ2√NTGχ,τN Xxi(zzi + vi)
i
θ2√NTGx,τD-τNN X Dχ,τzi(zi + Vi)
θ2√NTGx,TD-,T {Ξχλ + op (1)} ,
where we partition
xx
zx
xz
zz
conformably to the sizes of xit and zi , and set
)
Ξx = (Ξxx , Ξxz) . Similarly, by
Lemmas 2 and 4, under the fixed effect assumption, the second term of (92) is
θT √NTGχ,τ D-T
N x Dχ,τxiz! f-N X ziz! (N χ z (u+vi)
ii
θT√NTGχ,τD-,1T {
xzΞz-z1Ξzλ+op(1) .
Therefore, the limit of (92) is
θ ' G D [ ( Ξχχ
Ξ-1 Ξ .. 0 λ + op
xz zz zx . p
Recall that it is assumed that NN → c < ∞. Also, recall that under the restric-
tions given in the theorem, Gx,T = diag (Ik22, Ik3) and Dχ,τ = diag √TTlk22, D3τ) .
Then, letting λmax (A) denote the maximum eigenvalue of matrix A, we can have
λmax (θT√NTGχ,TD-Т)
O (1) ∖∕T λmax μ √TIk22 , D3T1^ → 0.
So, under the assumptions of Part (b), the probability limit of the numerator
of (88) is
1
NT
∑∑G∙,t ⅛⅛ + op (1).
(93)
Combining (91) and (93), we can obtain Part (b). ¥
Proof of Theorem 8
Using the notation in (87) , we can express the GLS estimator γg by
^
Yg - Y
57
More intriguing information
1. Learning-by-Exporting? Firm-Level Evidence for UK Manufacturing and Services Sectors2. Making International Human Rights Protection More Effective: A Rational-Choice Approach to the Effectiveness of Ius Standi Provisions
3. Human Resource Management Practices and Wage Dispersion in U.S. Establishments
4. Imputing Dairy Producers' Quota Discount Rate Using the Individual Export Milk Program in Quebec
5. Retirement and the Poverty of the Elderly in Portugal
6. Campanile Orchestra
7. The name is absent
8. Before and After the Hartz Reforms: The Performance of Active Labour Market Policy in Germany
9. The name is absent
10. Do the Largest Firms Grow the Fastest? The Case of U.S. Dairies