Large-N and Large-T Properties of Panel Data Estimators and the Hausman Test



bNT = P11,1 - Θι) mT Pt rm) Ui + Pι(el - e)ui

+ Piι,i - Θ1) TmmT Pt rm) Vi + Pi(ei e)Vi.

From these three equations, it is obvious that the terms including Tm will be
the dominant factors determining the asymptotic properties of
BNT, CNT, and
bNT. However, if the parameters Θ1,i are constant over different individuals so
that Θ
1,i - Θ1 = 0, none of BNT, CNT, and bNT depends on Tm . For this case,
the asymptotic properties of the three terms depend on
(ei e). This result
indicates that the asymptotic distribution of the between estimator
βbb , which is
a function of
BNT, CNT, and bNT, will depend on whether the parameters Θ1,i
are cross-sectionally heteroskedastic or homoskedastic. Somewhat interestingly,
however, the distinction between these two cases becomes unimportant when
the model has no intercept term (
ζ = 0) and is estimated with this restriction.
For such a case,
Bnt, Cnt and bdepend on Xi instead of ei. With Xi, the
terms (Θ
ι,i Θι) and (e e) in Bnt, Cnt, and bare replaced by Θι,i
and ei, respectively. Then, it is clear that the trend term Tm remains as a
dominating factor whether or not the Θ
1,i are heterogenous.

We now consider the asymptotic distributions of the within, between, GLS
estimators and the Hausman statistic under the two alternative assumptions
about the parameters Θ
1,i.

CASE 1.1: Assume that the parameters Θ1,i are heterogeneous over differ-
ent individuals; that is,
p1,2 - p12,1 6= 0. For this case, we can easily show:

plimN,τ →∞ T2m NTAnt =

p1,2q1;

1   1

plimN,τ →∞ T2m Nbnt =

. ∙             1 1 n

plimN,τ →∞ Tm Ncnt =

1^   1 и

plimN →∞ n Hn =

P1,2 P1,1

(m +1)2 ;

0;

σz2 ,

where qι = limτ→∞T P[(t∕T)m T t(t∕T)m]2 = R01[rm 1(m + 1)]2dr.7
The first two equalities are obtained using the fact that limτ→∞ T Pt(t∕T)m
= R01 rm dr = 1(m + 1). In addition, we can also show that as (N,T →∞),

11

= N (0, p1,2q1σv2);


N Λ 2 P1,2 P2

N I 0, σu / I -∣∖∙
u (
m +1)


Tm NTaNτ

ɪɪ b

TmN nt

7We can obtain these results using the fact that under given assumptions, √= Pt eit and
√= Pt Vit are i.i.d. over different i with N(0, σ2) and N(0, σ2), respectively, for any T.



More intriguing information

1. Family, social security and social insurance: General remarks and the present discussion in Germany as a case study
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. A Computational Model of Children's Semantic Memory
5. Large Scale Studies in den deutschen Sozialwissenschaften:Stand und Perspektiven. Bericht über einen Workshop der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft
6. Optimal Vehicle Size, Haulage Length, and the Structure of Transport Costs
7. Nietzsche, immortality, singularity and eternal recurrence1
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES IN TENNESSEE ON WATER USE AND CONTROL - AGRICULTURAL PHASES