Does the children ,s prior knowledge of the lexical items influence the provision ofperceptual
justifications?
As the figure 7.20 below shows, the provision of “perceptual” justifications did not differ
by the children’s prior knowledge of the lexical items. Statistical analysis revealed no
significant differences.
Figure 7.20 Provision of perceptual justifications by children’s prior knowledge of
lexical items across testing

] Unknown words
[ J Partially represented words
Is the provision ofperceptual justifications influenced by the semantic domain of the lexical
items?
Figure 7.21 shows that the children provided more “perceptual” justifications for the words
describing animals than for the words describing artifacts.
Figure 7.21 Provision of perceptual justifications by semantic domain across testing

I і Artifacts Γg¾ Animals
242
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Labour Market Flexibility and Regional Unemployment Rate Dynamics: Spain (1980-1995)
3. Placenta ingestion by rats enhances y- and n-opioid antinociception, but suppresses A-opioid antinociception
4. The name is absent
5. Peer Reviewed, Open Access, Free
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. WP 1 - The first part-time economy in the world. Does it work?
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent