Does the children ,s prior knowledge of the lexical items influence the provision ofperceptual
justifications?
As the figure 7.20 below shows, the provision of “perceptual” justifications did not differ
by the children’s prior knowledge of the lexical items. Statistical analysis revealed no
significant differences.
Figure 7.20 Provision of perceptual justifications by children’s prior knowledge of
lexical items across testing
] Unknown words
[ J Partially represented words
Is the provision ofperceptual justifications influenced by the semantic domain of the lexical
items?
Figure 7.21 shows that the children provided more “perceptual” justifications for the words
describing animals than for the words describing artifacts.
Figure 7.21 Provision of perceptual justifications by semantic domain across testing
I і Artifacts Γg¾ Animals
242
More intriguing information
1. Effects of red light and loud noise on the rate at which monkeys sample the sensory environment2. The name is absent
3. Cardiac Arrhythmia and Geomagnetic Activity
4. Foreword: Special Issue on Invasive Species
5. The name is absent
6. Une Gestion des ressources humaines à l'interface des organisations : vers une GRH territoriale ?
7. Locke's theory of perception
8. RETAIL SALES: DO THEY MEAN REDUCED EXPENDITURES? GERMAN GROCERY EVIDENCE
9. The name is absent
10. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln