5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan



253

Teachers’ perceptions

In the questionnaire survey, teachers were asked to indicate the extent to which they
praised their pupils in mathematics classes according to each of four criteria of teachers’
praise:

• when pupils get good results in Maths tests, compared to other pupils;

• when pupils have improved results in Maths tests over previous results;

• when pupils make more effort in Maths, compared to other pupils;

• when pupils make more effort in Maths than before.

Teachers’ perceptions of the extent to which they praised their pupils in mathematics
classes were measured with five-point rating scales; 5 for always and 1 for never. The
extent to which teachers reported praising their pupils differed according to the reason
for praise. These differences were statistically significant. Teachers of both age groups
were most likely to praise their pupils when they made more effort than before. 93.6% of
5th grade teachers and 81.0% of 8th grade teachers reported that they always or nearly
always praised pupils for this reason. On average, they reported that they praised their
pupils for this reason nearly always. A relatively small distribution of scores was found, in
teachers’ praising their pupils for this reason, especially among the responses of 5th
grade teachers. Teachers of both age groups reported praising their pupils sometimes
based on pupils’ improvement of results, and sometimes based on their pupils’ making
more effort than others. Teachers of both age groups were least likely to praise their
pupils for better results than others. They reported that they hardly ever praised their
pupils for this. 5th grade teachers adopted praise based on more effort than before more
specifically than other kinds of praise, while 8th grade teachers tended to adopt praise
based on absolute comparison rather than praise based on relative comparison. No
significant difference (p<. 01) was found in the teachers’ reported praise of their pupils,
irrespective of the reasons for the praise, between the responses of teachers of the
different age groups (see Table 7.4.9 and Figure 7.4.6).

253



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. DISCRIMINATORY APPROACH TO AUDITORY STIMULI IN GUINEA FOWL (NUMIDA MELEAGRIS) AFTER HYPERSTRIATAL∕HIPPOCAMP- AL BRAIN DAMAGE
3. DIVERSITY OF RURAL PLACES - TEXAS
4. THE DIGITAL DIVIDE: COMPUTER USE, BASIC SKILLS AND EMPLOYMENT
5. The name is absent
6. AN ANALYTICAL METHOD TO CALCULATE THE ERGODIC AND DIFFERENCE MATRICES OF THE DISCOUNTED MARKOV DECISION PROCESSES
7. Regionale Wachstumseffekte der GRW-Förderung? Eine räumlich-ökonometrische Analyse auf Basis deutscher Arbeitsmarktregionen
8. QUEST II. A Multi-Country Business Cycle and Growth Model
9. The name is absent
10. Confusion and Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Public Goods Games
11. Income Growth and Mobility of Rural Households in Kenya: Role of Education and Historical Patterns in Poverty Reduction
12. Placentophagia in Nonpregnant Nulliparous Mice: A Genetic Investigation1
13. The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns
14. Evaluating the Success of the School Commodity Food Program
15. The name is absent
16. Benchmarking Regional Innovation: A Comparison of Bavaria, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland
17. Secondary stress in Brazilian Portuguese: the interplay between production and perception studies
18. Education as a Moral Concept
19. The name is absent
20. National urban policy responses in the European Union: Towards a European urban policy?