251
Table 7.4.7: Division of pupils feeling happy with teachers’ praise with higher agreement
and lower agreement
5th graders__________________ |
8th graders | |||
Lower happiness |
Higher |
Lower happiness |
Higher | |
Better results than others |
M=3.39,SD=1.34,Mediaπ=4.00 |
M=3.64,SD=1.29,Median=4.00 | ||
49.3%__________ |
50.7% |
40.4% |
59.6% | |
Improvement results than |
M=3.71,SD=1.26,Median=4.00 |
M=3.96,SD=1.19,Median=4.00______ | ||
37.3%_________ |
62,7%_________ |
26.1%_________ |
73.9% ______ | |
More effort than others |
M=3.51,SD=1.30,Median=4.00 |
M=3.49,SD=1.24,Median=4.00______ | ||
45.1%_________ |
54.9% |
47.5% |
52.5% | |
More effort than before |
M=3.82,SD=1.29,Median=4.00 |
M=3.80,SD=1.23,Median=4.00 | ||
33.6%__________ |
66.4%_________ |
33.4%_________ |
66.6%_________ |
Table 7.4.8: Pupils’ perceptions of the frequency Ofdeployment Ofteaching methods and
affective attitudes promoted by these teaching methods according to their feeling happy
with the teacher’s praise
Enjoyment |
Motivation |
Sense Ofsecurity |
Sense of progress_________ |
Deployment | |||
Happy Better results |
5⅛ |
p<.01 |
PW,RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
RT1TE1IW1IH |
Other |
UC,WD |
IW___________ |
PW,UC,WD,GD~ | ||||
8th |
p<.01 |
UC,RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
RT,TE, | |
Other |
PW |
PW,UC,GD | |||||
Happy |
^5s |
p<,01 |
PW,RT,TE, |
PW,RT,TE, |
PW,RT,TE, |
PW,RT,TE, |
PW,RT,TE, |
Other |
UC_________ |
UC__________ |
UC_________ |
UC_________ |
UC | ||
^gS |
p<.01 |
PW,UC,RT, TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT, TE, |
PW,UC,RT, TE, |
PW,RT, TE, | |
Other |
UC | ||||||
Happy More effort than |
p<.01 |
PW,RT,TE, |
PW,RT,TE, |
PW,RT,TE, |
PW,RT,TE, |
"τξ | |
Other |
UC_________ |
UC__________ |
UC________ |
UC_________ |
PW,UC,RT,GD | ||
^8s |
p<.01 |
PW,UC,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW,RT,TE, | |
Other |
RT |
UC1IW | |||||
Happy More effort than |
p<.01 |
PW,RT,TE, |
PW,RT,TE, |
PW,RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW1RT1TE1 IW1IH1WD1GD | |
Other |
UC_________ |
UC__________ |
UC_________ |
UC_________ | |||
8lh |
p<.01 |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW1UC1RT1TE1 IW1IH1WD1 GD | |
Other |
IW |
NB. Teaching methods in bold are those where there were significant differences
between the groups. Full details see Appendices 7.4.9-7.4.16.
Table 7.4.8 indicates that there were significant differences in relation to the deployment
and perceived effects on attitudes in relation to almost every teaching method between
pupils who were happy to receive praise.
251
More intriguing information
1. Wirkt eine Preisregulierung nur auf den Preis?: Anmerkungen zu den Wirkungen einer Preisregulierung auf das Werbevolumen2. SOCIOECONOMIC TRENDS CHANGING RURAL AMERICA
3. The name is absent
4. Social Irresponsibility in Management
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Crime as a Social Cost of Poverty and Inequality: A Review Focusing on Developing Countries
9. Cardiac Arrhythmia and Geomagnetic Activity
10. Indirect Effects of Pesticide Regulation and the Food Quality Protection Act