251
Table 7.4.7: Division of pupils feeling happy with teachers’ praise with higher agreement
and lower agreement
5th graders__________________ |
8th graders | |||
Lower happiness |
Higher |
Lower happiness |
Higher | |
Better results than others |
M=3.39,SD=1.34,Mediaπ=4.00 |
M=3.64,SD=1.29,Median=4.00 | ||
49.3%__________ |
50.7% |
40.4% |
59.6% | |
Improvement results than |
M=3.71,SD=1.26,Median=4.00 |
M=3.96,SD=1.19,Median=4.00______ | ||
37.3%_________ |
62,7%_________ |
26.1%_________ |
73.9% ______ | |
More effort than others |
M=3.51,SD=1.30,Median=4.00 |
M=3.49,SD=1.24,Median=4.00______ | ||
45.1%_________ |
54.9% |
47.5% |
52.5% | |
More effort than before |
M=3.82,SD=1.29,Median=4.00 |
M=3.80,SD=1.23,Median=4.00 | ||
33.6%__________ |
66.4%_________ |
33.4%_________ |
66.6%_________ |
Table 7.4.8: Pupils’ perceptions of the frequency Ofdeployment Ofteaching methods and
affective attitudes promoted by these teaching methods according to their feeling happy
with the teacher’s praise
Enjoyment |
Motivation |
Sense Ofsecurity |
Sense of progress_________ |
Deployment | |||
Happy Better results |
5⅛ |
p<.01 |
PW,RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
RT1TE1IW1IH |
Other |
UC,WD |
IW___________ |
PW,UC,WD,GD~ | ||||
8th |
p<.01 |
UC,RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
RT,TE, | |
Other |
PW |
PW,UC,GD | |||||
Happy |
^5s |
p<,01 |
PW,RT,TE, |
PW,RT,TE, |
PW,RT,TE, |
PW,RT,TE, |
PW,RT,TE, |
Other |
UC_________ |
UC__________ |
UC_________ |
UC_________ |
UC | ||
^gS |
p<.01 |
PW,UC,RT, TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT, TE, |
PW,UC,RT, TE, |
PW,RT, TE, | |
Other |
UC | ||||||
Happy More effort than |
p<.01 |
PW,RT,TE, |
PW,RT,TE, |
PW,RT,TE, |
PW,RT,TE, |
"τξ | |
Other |
UC_________ |
UC__________ |
UC________ |
UC_________ |
PW,UC,RT,GD | ||
^8s |
p<.01 |
PW,UC,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW,RT,TE, | |
Other |
RT |
UC1IW | |||||
Happy More effort than |
p<.01 |
PW,RT,TE, |
PW,RT,TE, |
PW,RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW1RT1TE1 IW1IH1WD1GD | |
Other |
UC_________ |
UC__________ |
UC_________ |
UC_________ | |||
8lh |
p<.01 |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW1UC1RT1TE1 IW1IH1WD1 GD | |
Other |
IW |
NB. Teaching methods in bold are those where there were significant differences
between the groups. Full details see Appendices 7.4.9-7.4.16.
Table 7.4.8 indicates that there were significant differences in relation to the deployment
and perceived effects on attitudes in relation to almost every teaching method between
pupils who were happy to receive praise.
251
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. Consumption Behaviour in Zambia: The Link to Poverty Alleviation?
4. The name is absent
5. The Triangular Relationship between the Commission, NRAs and National Courts Revisited
6. Towards Learning Affective Body Gesture
7. The name is absent
8. Opciones de política económica en el Perú 2011-2015
9. Public infrastructure capital, scale economies and returns to variety
10. El impacto espacial de las economías de aglomeración y su efecto sobre la estructura urbana.El caso de la industria en Barcelona, 1986-1996