250
Individual work when they felt more frequent teacher’s praise for better results than
others, but for no other reasons (see Table 7.4.6, See details Appendices 7.4.1-7.4.8).
Table 7.4.6: Pupils’ perceptions of the frequency of deployment of teaching methods and
affective attitudes promoted by these teaching methods according to their perceived
frequency о |
rteac |
ιer,s praise______________________________________________ | |||||
Enjoyment |
Motivation |
Sense Ofsecurity |
Sense of progress_________ |
Deployment | |||
Better results |
^^5th |
p<.01 |
PW, RT, TE, |
PW, RT, TE, |
PW, RT,TE, |
PW1 RT1 TE1 GD________ |
PW1UC1 |
Other |
UC_________ |
UC__________ |
UC,IW________ |
UC1IW1IH1WD |
RT1TEJW1WD | ||
~~8* |
p<.01 |
RT, TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW,UC1RT1TE IW1IH1WD1 GD |
PW1UC1RT1 TE1 |
PW1UC1TE1 IH1 WD1 GD | |
Other |
PW1UC |
RT1IW_________ | |||||
Improvement of |
p<.01 |
PW, RT,TE, |
PW, RT,TE, |
PW1 RT1TE1 IH1WD1 GD |
PW1 RT1TE1 |
PW1 IH1WD1 GD | |
Other |
uc,ιw |
UC1IW_________ |
UC,IW________ |
UC,IW,IH |
UC1RT1TE1IW | ||
p<.01 |
TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW1UC1RT1TE1 IH1WD1GD |
PW1UC1RT1TE1 IW1IH1WD1GD |
PW1TE1 IH1WD1GD | ||
Other |
PW,UC,RT |
IW |
UC1RT1IW | ||||
More effort than |
^5s |
p<.01 |
PW,RT,TE, |
PW,RT, TE, |
PW1RT1TE1 IH1WD1 GD |
PW1RT1TE1 WD1 GD |
IH1WD1 GD |
Other |
UCJWJH |
UC__________ |
UC1IW1________ |
UC1IW1IH |
UC1RT1TE1IW | ||
8th |
p<.01 |
RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW1UC1RT1TE1 IH1WD1GD |
PW1UC1RT1TE1 IW1IH1WD1GD |
PW1UC1TE1 IH1WD1GD | |
Other |
PW1UC |
IW |
RT1IW | ||||
More effort than |
^^5s |
p<.01 |
PW,RT,TE, |
PW,RT,TE, |
PW1RT1TE1 IH1WD1 GD |
PW1RT1TE1 IW1IH1WD1GD |
PW1UC1 IH1WD1 GD |
Other |
uc,ιw________ |
UC__________ |
uc,ιw_________ |
UC_________ |
RT1TEJW | ||
~8* |
p<.01 |
RT,TE, |
PW,UC,RT,TE, |
PW1UC1RT1TE1 IH1WD1GD |
PW1UC1RT1TE1 IW1IH1WD1 GD |
PW1UC1TE1 IH1WD1GD | |
Other |
PW,UC |
IW |
RTJW |
NB. Teaching methods in bold are those where there were significant differences
between the groups. Full details see Appendices 7.4.1-7.4.8.
Pupils were asked to what extent they felt happy with receiving each type of praise.
Pupils of both age groups felt happy with praise given for improvement of results or
increased effort. Most 8th graders felt happy when praise was given for improvement of
results. 50.7% of 5th graders and 59.6% of 8th graders expressed absolute agreement or
agreement about feeling happy when given praise for being better than others. 62.7% of
5th graders and 73.9% of 8th graders expressed absolute agreement or agreement about
feeling happy when given praise for improvement of results. 54.9% of 5th graders and
52.5% of 8th graders expressed absolute agreement or agreement about feeling happy
when given praise for making more effort than others. 66.4% of 5th graders and 66.6% of
8th graders expressed absolute agreement or agreement about feeling happy when
given praise for increased effort (see Table 7.4.7).
250
More intriguing information
1. SME'S SUPPORT AND REGIONAL POLICY IN EU - THE NORTE-LITORAL PORTUGUESE EXPERIENCE2. Governance Control Mechanisms in Portuguese Agricultural Credit Cooperatives
3. Improving the Impact of Market Reform on Agricultural Productivity in Africa: How Institutional Design Makes a Difference
4. Ruptures in the probability scale. Calculation of ruptures’ values
5. Putting Globalization and Concentration in the Agri-food Sector into Context
6. The Macroeconomic Determinants of Volatility in Precious Metals Markets
7. ADJUSTMENT TO GLOBALISATION: A STUDY OF THE FOOTWEAR INDUSTRY IN EUROPE
8. Confusion and Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Public Goods Games
9. Mean Variance Optimization of Non-Linear Systems and Worst-case Analysis
10. ‘I’m so much more myself now, coming back to work’ - working class mothers, paid work and childcare.