Commuting in multinodal urban systems: An empirical comparison of three alternative models



Table 3             Average commuting distance for the four urban regions in

the case of a concentrated employment pattern

Amsterdam

Utrecht

Rotterdam

The Hague

- constant C

49839

80971

159002

216230

- τ

-0.28

-0.59

-0.70

-0.95

- P (x)

49839 x-0.28

80971 x-0.59

159002 x-.70

216230 x-0.95

(21.76)     (-1.94)

(29.84)     (-4.66)

(28.70)    (-5.21)

(25.45)    (-5.01)

- R2

0.07

0.47

0.44

0.65

- A

6.1

7.3

7.2

4.1

17



More intriguing information

1. Reputations, Market Structure, and the Choice of Quality Assurance Systems in the Food Industry
2. Review of “The Hesitant Hand: Taming Self-Interest in the History of Economic Ideas”
3. WP 1 - The first part-time economy in the world. Does it work?
4. Wettbewerbs- und Industriepolitik - EU-Integration als Dritter Weg?
5. Higher education funding reforms in England: the distributional effects and the shifting balance of costs
6. Opciones de política económica en el Perú 2011-2015
7. Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton-top tamarin monkeys
8. The name is absent
9. FOREIGN AGRICULTURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS AND FOREIGN RELATIONS
10. The name is absent