Table 3 Average commuting distance for the four urban regions in
the case of a concentrated employment pattern
|
Amsterdam |
Utrecht |
Rotterdam |
The Hague | |
|
- constant C |
49839 |
80971 |
159002 |
216230 |
|
- τ |
-0.28 |
-0.59 |
-0.70 |
-0.95 |
|
- P (x) |
49839 x-0.28 |
80971 x-0.59 |
159002 x-.70 |
216230 x-0.95 |
|
(21.76) (-1.94) |
(29.84) (-4.66) |
(28.70) (-5.21) |
(25.45) (-5.01) | |
|
- R2 |
0.07 |
0.47 |
0.44 |
0.65 |
|
- A |
6.1 |
7.3 |
7.2 |
4.1 |
17
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Income Taxation when Markets are Incomplete
3. The name is absent
4. Categorial Grammar and Discourse
5. Evidence-Based Professional Development of Science Teachers in Two Countries
6. The name is absent
7. Trade Openness and Volatility
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Commuting in multinodal urban systems: An empirical comparison of three alternative models