Table 3 Average commuting distance for the four urban regions in
the case of a concentrated employment pattern
|
Amsterdam |
Utrecht |
Rotterdam |
The Hague | |
|
- constant C |
49839 |
80971 |
159002 |
216230 |
|
- τ |
-0.28 |
-0.59 |
-0.70 |
-0.95 |
|
- P (x) |
49839 x-0.28 |
80971 x-0.59 |
159002 x-.70 |
216230 x-0.95 |
|
(21.76) (-1.94) |
(29.84) (-4.66) |
(28.70) (-5.21) |
(25.45) (-5.01) | |
|
- R2 |
0.07 |
0.47 |
0.44 |
0.65 |
|
- A |
6.1 |
7.3 |
7.2 |
4.1 |
17
More intriguing information
1. Langfristige Wachstumsaussichten der ukrainischen Wirtschaft : Potenziale und Barrieren2. Life is an Adventure! An agent-based reconciliation of narrative and scientific worldviews
3. The Impact of Cognitive versus Affective Aspects on Consumer Usage of Financial Service Delivery Channels
4. Migration and employment status during the turbulent nineties in Sweden
5. On Dictatorship, Economic Development and Stability
6. Program Semantics and Classical Logic
7. Geography, Health, and Demo-Economic Development
8. Tax systems and tax reforms in Europe: Rationale and open issue for more radical reforms
9. Behaviour-based Knowledge Systems: An Epigenetic Path from Behaviour to Knowledge
10. CAPACITAÇÃO GERENCIAL DE AGRICULTORES FAMILIARES: UMA PROPOSTA METODOLÓGICA DE EXTENSÃO RURAL