Commuting in multinodal urban systems: An empirical comparison of three alternative models



Table 3             Average commuting distance for the four urban regions in

the case of a concentrated employment pattern

Amsterdam

Utrecht

Rotterdam

The Hague

- constant C

49839

80971

159002

216230

- τ

-0.28

-0.59

-0.70

-0.95

- P (x)

49839 x-0.28

80971 x-0.59

159002 x-.70

216230 x-0.95

(21.76)     (-1.94)

(29.84)     (-4.66)

(28.70)    (-5.21)

(25.45)    (-5.01)

- R2

0.07

0.47

0.44

0.65

- A

6.1

7.3

7.2

4.1

17



More intriguing information

1. MULTIPLE COMPARISONS WITH THE BEST: BAYESIAN PRECISION MEASURES OF EFFICIENCY RANKINGS
2. Multi-Agent System Interaction in Integrated SCM
3. ¿Por qué se privatizan servicios en los municipios (pequeños)? Evidencia empírica sobre residuos sólidos y agua.
4. Cancer-related electronic support groups as navigation-aids: Overcoming geographic barriers
5. On the Relation between Robust and Bayesian Decision Making
6. The name is absent
7. The migration of unskilled youth: Is there any wage gain?
8. Pricing American-style Derivatives under the Heston Model Dynamics: A Fast Fourier Transformation in the Geske–Johnson Scheme
9. Asymmetric transfer of the dynamic motion aftereffect between first- and second-order cues and among different second-order cues
10. The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns