Table 3 Average commuting distance for the four urban regions in
the case of a concentrated employment pattern
|
Amsterdam |
Utrecht |
Rotterdam |
The Hague | |
|
- constant C |
49839 |
80971 |
159002 |
216230 |
|
- τ |
-0.28 |
-0.59 |
-0.70 |
-0.95 |
|
- P (x) |
49839 x-0.28 |
80971 x-0.59 |
159002 x-.70 |
216230 x-0.95 |
|
(21.76) (-1.94) |
(29.84) (-4.66) |
(28.70) (-5.21) |
(25.45) (-5.01) | |
|
- R2 |
0.07 |
0.47 |
0.44 |
0.65 |
|
- A |
6.1 |
7.3 |
7.2 |
4.1 |
17
More intriguing information
1. Public infrastructure capital, scale economies and returns to variety2. Sector Switching: An Unexplored Dimension of Firm Dynamics in Developing Countries
3. The name is absent
4. A Hybrid Neural Network and Virtual Reality System for Spatial Language Processing
5. Stillbirth in a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital in North Bengal - A Review of Causes, Risk Factors and Prevention Strategies
6. The Role of Land Retirement Programs for Management of Water Resources
7. The name is absent
8. Cancer-related electronic support groups as navigation-aids: Overcoming geographic barriers
9. Konjunkturprognostiker unter Panik: Kommentar
10. The Challenge of Urban Regeneration in Deprived European Neighbourhoods - a Partnership Approach