Ex post analysis of the regional impacts of major infrastructure: the Channel Tunnel 10 years on.



Looking at the wider context we see a number of tendencies which will limit the role
and impact of the Tunnel. We believe that cross-Channel traffic will grow slowly
because of the increasing convergence of prices, the perceived need to continue a high
level of precautions against illegal migration and terrorist activity, and minimal
growth in cross-Channel commuting. Expansion will therefore be dependent upon
major economic change in areas served by the Tunnel and CTRL: the only likely area
of growth seems to us to be Ebbsfleet and the Thames Gateway which will become a
major economic growth pole for South East England but with only a subsidiary role in
relation to Europe. We do not believe Ashford, Dover or Shepway will experience
major economic growth, though Ashford may continue to expand as a dormitory area
and local service centre.

In other words all the evidence from a period which might have seen major changes in
the Kent economy points to an essential continuance of the status quo: a major
transport infrastructure project does not necessarily change the economic fortunes of a
region.

References

Channel Tunnel Joint Consultative Committee (1987) Kent Impact Study: Overall
Assessment
, London: HMSO

Fayman, S., P.Metge, K. Spiekermann, M .Wegener, T.Flowerdew and I.Williams
(1995) ‘The regional impact of the Channel Tunnel: qualitative and quantitative
analysis’
European Planning Studies, 3, 333-356

Flyvbjerg, B., N. Bruzelius and W. Rothengatter (2003) Megaprojects: An Anatomy of
Risk
, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Holliday, I.M., G.Marcou and R.W.Vickerman (1991) The Chnanel Tunnel: public
Policy, Regional development and Euroepan Integration,
London: Belhaven Press

Spiekermann, K and M.Wegener (1997) ‘The Channel Tunnel and regional
development: combining qualitative and quantitative methods’ in Quinet, E. and R.
Vickerman (eds)
The Econometrics of Major Transport Infrastructures, London:
Macmillan

Vickerman, R.W. (1987) ‘The Channel Tunnel: consequences for regional growth and
development’,
Regional Studies, 21, 187-197

Vickerman, R.W. (1994a) ‘Transport policy and the Channel Tunnel: UK, French and
European perspectives’, in Gibb, R. (ed.)
The Channel Tunnel: a Geographcial
Perspective
, Chichester: John Wiley

Vickerman, R.W. (1994b) ‘The Channel Tunnel and regional development in Europe:
an overview’,
Applied Geography, 14, 9-25

24



More intriguing information

1. Lumpy Investment, Sectoral Propagation, and Business Cycles
2. Empirical Calibration of a Least-Cost Conservation Reserve Program
3. Cross-Country Evidence on the Link between the Level of Infrastructure and Capital Inflows
4. The name is absent
5. Who runs the IFIs?
6. The geography of collaborative knowledge production: entropy techniques and results for the European Union
7. A Bayesian approach to analyze regional elasticities
8. Short Term Memory May Be the Depletion of the Readily Releasable Pool of Presynaptic Neurotransmitter Vesicles
9. A Location Game On Disjoint Circles
10. The name is absent
11. The name is absent
12. Quality Enhancement for E-Learning Courses: The Role of Student Feedback
13. Dendritic Inhibition Enhances Neural Coding Properties
14. The Role of Immigration in Sustaining the Social Security System: A Political Economy Approach
15. THE CHANGING STRUCTURE OF AGRICULTURE
16. Correlates of Alcoholic Blackout Experience
17. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ALTERNATIVE ECONOMETRIC PACKAGES: AN APPLICATION TO ITALIAN DEPOSIT INTEREST RATES
18. How do investors' expectations drive asset prices?
19. The name is absent
20. CURRENT CHALLENGES FOR AGRICULTURAL POLICY