The name is absent



456


* Aboriginal students have internalised the negative

typifications of mainstream society towards Aborigines.
They support typifications of Aborigines that are

predominantly negative, though less negative than
that of non-Aborigines (p.∙344ff.).
T

* Aboriginal students have not internalised negative
typifications for themselves (p.∙ 370ff.) They typify

themselves positively, and they theorize positively
*

about themselves, their families, their location in

society (p. 400ff.).

* Aboriginal students typify ’Australians’ positively
(p. 362 ff.) ;

Hypothesis 2.1


(E∙ 46)


The hypothesis that the typificatioon of Aborigines would be

negative was supported.

The hypothesis that the greater the visibility of the Aboriginal

groupi the more negative would be the. typification^ was supported.

Hypothesis 2.2 (p. 46)

The hypothesis that there would be evidence of institutionalisation
of typifications (that isi that the Aborigines would have internalised
the negative typifications of the dominant group) was supported in
the case of typification of Aborigines in general.

It was not supported for typifications of the Aboriginal self.

Hypothesis 2.3 (p. 46)

The hypothesis that Aborigines would typify Australians negatively
was not supported.

The hypothesis that Aborigines would typify Italians negatively
was not supported.



More intriguing information

1. Imitation in location choice
2. Valuing Farm Financial Information
3. Micro-strategies of Contextualization Cross-national Transfer of Socially Responsible Investment
4. Improving behaviour classification consistency: a technique from biological taxonomy
5. Climate change, mitigation and adaptation: the case of the Murray–Darling Basin in Australia
6. Direct observations of the kinetics of migrating T-cells suggest active retention by endothelial cells with continual bidirectional migration
7. The name is absent
8. Behaviour-based Knowledge Systems: An Epigenetic Path from Behaviour to Knowledge
9. Monopolistic Pricing in the Banking Industry: a Dynamic Model
10. THE MEXICAN HOG INDUSTRY: MOVING BEYOND 2003