456
* Aboriginal students have internalised the negative
typifications of mainstream society towards Aborigines.
They support typifications of Aborigines that are
predominantly negative, though less negative than
that of non-Aborigines (p.∙344ff.).
T
* Aboriginal students have not internalised negative
typifications for themselves (p.∙ 370ff.) They typify
themselves positively, and they theorize positively
*
about themselves, their families, their location in
society (p. 400ff.).
* Aboriginal students typify ’Australians’ positively
(p. 362 ff.) ;
Hypothesis 2.1
(E∙ 46)
The hypothesis that the typificatioon of Aborigines would be
negative was supported.
The hypothesis that the greater the visibility of the Aboriginal
groupi the more negative would be the. typification^ was supported.
Hypothesis 2.2 (p. 46)
The hypothesis that there would be evidence of institutionalisation
of typifications (that isi that the Aborigines would have internalised
the negative typifications of the dominant group) was supported in
the case of typification of Aborigines in general.
It was not supported for typifications of the Aboriginal self.
Hypothesis 2.3 (p. 46)
The hypothesis that Aborigines would typify Australians negatively
was not supported.
The hypothesis that Aborigines would typify Italians negatively
was not supported.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Developmental changes in the theta response system: a single sweep analysis
3. The Modified- Classroom ObservationScheduletoMeasureIntenticnaCommunication( M-COSMIC): EvaluationofReliabilityandValidity
4. The East Asian banking sector—overweight?
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Mortality study of 18 000 patients treated with omeprazole
9. The name is absent
10. Governance Control Mechanisms in Portuguese Agricultural Credit Cooperatives