|
Deprived neigh. |
Other neighborhoods |
Total | |||
|
Public housing |
Other |
Public housing |
Other | ||
|
Number of individuals |
1,348 |
1,955 |
659 |
6,511 |
10,473 |
|
% of total sample |
12.9 |
18.7 |
6.3 |
62.2 |
100.0 |
|
Unemployment rate (%) |
14.2 |
6.7 |
9.9 |
4.4 |
6.4 |
|
Tenure | |||||
|
Homeowner |
0.0 |
60.7 |
0.0 |
63.7 |
50.9 |
|
Renter in the private sector |
0.0 |
33.1 |
0.0 |
32.0 |
26.1 |
|
Renter in the public sector |
100.0 |
0.0 |
100.0 |
0.0 |
19.2 |
|
Other renter |
0.0 |
6.1 |
0.0 |
4.3 |
3.8 |
|
Individual characteristics | |||||
|
Age |
40.1 |
42.2 |
38.9 |
42.4 |
41.8 |
|
Nationality | |||||
|
French born in France |
59.6 |
76.9 |
70.1 |
86.9 |
80.4 |
|
Fr. born abroad |
14.5 |
11.2 |
12.6 |
8.5 |
10.0 |
|
Foreign nation. |
25.8 |
11.9 |
17.3 |
4.6 |
9.5 |
|
Education | |||||
|
No diploma |
30.8 |
17.4 |
22.6 |
8.0 |
13.6 |
|
At most lower sec. edu. |
16.5 |
14.7 |
14.6 |
11.2 |
12.7 |
|
Vocational training |
33.9 |
32.33 |
35.8 |
25.4 |
28.4 |
|
High school final diploma |
9.4 |
12.7 |
12.9 |
13.4 |
12.7 |
|
University degree |
9.3 |
22.9 |
14.1 |
42.0 |
32.5 |
|
Occupational status | |||||
|
Farmer or independent w. |
2.7 |
10.5 |
4.6 |
12.4 |
10.3 |
|
Executive |
3.3 |
15.4 |
8.3 |
33.1 |
24.4 |
|
Intermediate professions |
14.8 |
27.6 |
22.1 |
27.6 |
25.6 |
|
Office worker |
13.6 |
10.9 |
14.0 |
8.2 |
9.7 |
|
Blue-collar worker |
65.5 |
35.6 |
51.0 |
18.7 |
29.9 |
|
Spouse characteristics | |||||
|
Age |
37.1 |
40.1 |
36.6 |
40.6 |
40.8 |
|
Nationality | |||||
|
French born in France |
62.3 |
78.2 |
74.6 |
87.9 |
81.9 |
|
Fr. born abroad |
13.2 |
10.9 |
9.9 |
7.6 |
9.1 |
|
Foreign nation. |
24.5 |
10.9 |
15.5 |
4.5 |
9.0 |
|
Education | |||||
|
No diploma |
32.5 |
15.6 |
22.5 |
6.7 |
12.7 |
|
At most lower sec. edu. |
19.4 |
17.0 |
18.2 |
14.2 |
15.7 |
|
Vocational training |
27.6 |
25.4 |
27.8 |
19.6 |
22.2 |
|
High school final diploma |
10.2 |
15.1 |
15.8 |
17.9 |
16.3 |
|
University degree |
10.3 |
26.8 |
15.8 |
41.4 |
33.1 |
|
Households characteristics | |||||
|
Number of children | |||||
|
None |
21.7 |
29.6 |
24.7 |
29.7 |
28.3 |
|
One |
24.3 |
25.8 |
21.8 |
25.8 |
25.3 |
|
Two |
26.6 |
27.5 |
29.3 |
30.1 |
29.1 |
|
Three |
14.8 |
11.8 |
15.0 |
11.3 |
12.1 |
|
Four of more |
12.6 |
5.4 |
9.1 |
3.0 |
5.1 |
Figures give the mean value for continuous variables and frequency for discrete variables.
Table 3: Sample characteristics by residential situation
28
More intriguing information
1. Computing optimal sampling designs for two-stage studies2. The name is absent
3. Studying How E-Markets Evaluation Can Enhance Trust in Virtual Business Communities
4. Heavy Hero or Digital Dummy: multimodal player-avatar relations in FINAL FANTASY 7
5. Climate Policy under Sustainable Discounted Utilitarianism
6. Estimation of marginal abatement costs for undesirable outputs in India's power generation sector: An output distance function approach.
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Investment in Next Generation Networks and the Role of Regulation: A Real Option Approach
10. Foreign direct investment in the Indian telecommunications sector