The name is absent



Hence, the considerable effort that is spent at the point at which the tug-of-
war becomes symmetric in terms of the prizes that are at stake for the two
contestants prevents the contestant who is lagging behind in terms of battle
victories from spending positive effort.

Discounting played two important roles in our analysis. First, discounting
leads to payoff functions that are continuous at infinity, allowing the applica-
tion of the one-stage deviation principle, which greatly facilitates our proofs.
Moreover, discounting is essential in giving a meaningful role to the distance
to the state with final victory. The following holds:

Proposition 4 For a given value of > 1, the tipping state j0 is an
increasing step function of
δ. Moreover, as δ 1, A wins the tug-of-war
without e
ffort starting from any state j < m 1.

Proof. The tipping state j0 is by definition the smallest state j for which
player
B is advantaged: j0 = min{j Mmt δ2Zaδm~∙iZb } when this set is
non-empty, and
j0 = m otherwise. For δ > 0, the inequality δ2 Zaδm ^ Zb
is equivalent to δ2j ”'ZaZb. Since m 3, for δ sufficently close to
zero the inequality is clearly satisfied for
j = m 1, so that j0 is interior.
Moreover, since
δ2j ”' 1 for j ψ ,it must be the case that j0 A. As
δ 1, the inequality is violated at all interior states, even at j = m 1.
In this case, by definiton
j0 = m, and from Proposition 2 player A wins
the war from any state
j < m 1. For any 0 < δ < 1, δ2j ”'ZaZb is
^R
log ɪ^

equivalent to 2j m log , so that j0 is the smallest index j satisfying
the inequality. Since the left hand side of this inequality is positive, and
both the numerator and denominator of the right hand side are negative, as
δ increases, the right hand side monotonically increases, eventually diverging
to
as δ 1. Hence, as δ increases, the smallest index j satisfying the
inequality must increase in steps until it hits
m. ■

As the discount factor increases, relative prize value or player strength
plays a greater role in the determination of the outcome than distance. For
any given value of
½A1, as δ increases the tipping state j0 moves in discrete
jumps towards
m. Player A may suffer a greater distance disadvantage and
still win the prize with certainty.

19



More intriguing information

1. Consciousness, cognition, and the hierarchy of context: extending the global neuronal workspace model
2. The Role of Land Retirement Programs for Management of Water Resources
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The Impact of Cognitive versus Affective Aspects on Consumer Usage of Financial Service Delivery Channels
6. Exchange Rate Uncertainty and Trade Growth - A Comparison of Linear and Nonlinear (Forecasting) Models
7. The name is absent
8. Three Strikes and You.re Out: Reply to Cooper and Willis
9. The name is absent
10. CAN CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS PREDICT FINANCIAL CRISES? EMPIRICAL STUDY ON EMERGING MARKETS
11. A Study of Prospective Ophthalmology Residents’ Career Perceptions
12. Studies on association of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and its effect on improvement of sorghum bicolor (L.)
13. The name is absent
14. AGRIBUSINESS EXECUTIVE EDUCATION AND KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE: NEW MECHANISMS OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT INVOLVING THE UNIVERSITY, PRIVATE FIRM STAKEHOLDERS AND PUBLIC SECTOR
15. Firm Closure, Financial Losses and the Consequences for an Entrepreneurial Restart
16. Secondary stress in Brazilian Portuguese: the interplay between production and perception studies
17. The name is absent
18. Olfactory Neuroblastoma: Diagnostic Difficulty
19. Learning and Endogenous Business Cycles in a Standard Growth Model
20. Are combination forecasts of S&P 500 volatility statistically superior?