The name is absent



Tabl. 9: Synthetic Regional Vulnerability Index (SRVI) Ranking on scenario 4

SRVI Value by Scenario /10

Ranking
on S4

Regions

Country

Prod.

S1 agri

S2 aval

S3 eco

S4 equi

Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki_________

G

fru

7,36

10,00

8,74

10,00

1

Thessalia_____________________________

G

fru

7,52

7,79

10,00

8,09

2

Calabria______________________________

I

fru

3,54

4,30

6,06

6,05

3

Castilla-La Mancha_________________

E

veg

3,21

5,62

5,32

4,70

4

Norte-Entre Douro__________________

P

f&l

10,00

4,29

5,84

4,65

5

Aragon_________________________

E

fru

4,13

3,17

5,39

4,55

6

Alentejo e Algarve___________________

P

f&l

3,84

3,12

5,32

4,11

7

Liguria_______________________________

I

veg

2,51

2,29

3,91

3,01

8

Toscana___________________________

I

veg

4,54

2,17

3,49

2,62

9

Lazio_______________________________

I

veg

4,14

2,38

2,88

2,36

10

Sterea Ellas-Nissi Egaeou-Kriti________

G

veg

2,07

2,33

2,79

2,31

11

Sicilia____________________________________

I

f&l

1,77

2,06

2,73

2,26

12

Midi-Pyrénées_____________________

F

fru

2,34

1,93

2,83

2,24

13

Centro-Ribatejo e Oeste______________

P

f&l

1,86

2,02

2,70

2,20

14

Veneto____________________________

I

f&l

2,07

2,01

2,58

2,12

15

Emilia Romagna__________________

I

f&l

1,51

1,79

2,32

1,94

16

Campania_______________________

I

f&l

1,62

1,85

2,30

1,92

17

Piemonte__________________________

I

fru

2,79

1,47

2,57

1,92

18

Cataluna____________________________

E

fru

2,81

1,73

2,37

1,88

19

Provence Alpes Côte d'Azur_________

F

f&l

1,70

1,73

2,24

1,84

20

Pays de la Loire_____________________

F

veg

2,08

1,42

2,37

1,77

21

Andalucia_________________________

E

f&l

1,52

1,71

2,13

1,76

22

Ipiros-Peloponissos-Nissi Ioniou______

G

f&l

1,22

1,60

2,13

1,75

23

Murcia___________________________

E

f&l

1,59

1,35

2,30

1,74

24

Valencia____________________________

E

f&l

1,47

1,42

2,12

1,70

25

Puglia______________________________

I

veg

2,04

1,12

2,31

1,65

26

Trentino______________________________

I

fru

1,76

0,99

2,23

1,56

27

Languedoc Roussillon_______________

F

f&l

1,16

1,14

1,86

1,44

28

Bretagne__________________________

F

veg

1,65

1,14

1,94

1,42

29

Rhône-Alpes______________________

F

f&l

1,54

1,09

1,64

1,27

30

Average 30 régions_________________

2,16

1,79

2,75

2,15

2.1 - Scenario 1: Strength of fruit and vegetable production

In this scenario, it is the performances of the agricultural sector (farms specialising in the production of
fruit and vegetables) which determine regional competitiveness. Vulnerability is thus the index of weak
relative inter-regional competitiveness. The ranking established using the SRVI for each region is not
identical to that of the score for fresh fruit and vegetables as the index includes variables other than those
of the agricultural production sector alone (industry, trade, regional economy). The scores obtained in this
first simulation range from 1.16 to 10, with an average of 2.16: more than 80% of the regions demonstrate
a vulnerability of less than 5/10.

The most vulnerable regions (Norte-Entre Douro, Thessalia, Makedonia, Toscana, Lazio) are relatively
poor and/or have a small fruit and vegetables sector, as well as being more specialised in either fruit
production or vegetable production. Inversely, the competitive regions produce both fruit and vegetables
in large quantities and in regions which are rich and highly populated.

12



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Bidding for Envy-Freeness: A Procedural Approach to n-Player Fair Division Problems
3. Peer Reviewed, Open Access, Free
4. Flatliners: Ideology and Rational Learning in the Diffusion of the Flat Tax
5. STIMULATING COOPERATION AMONG FARMERS IN A POST-SOCIALIST ECONOMY: LESSONS FROM A PUBLIC-PRIVATE MARKETING PARTNERSHIP IN POLAND
6. Studies on association of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and its effect on improvement of sorghum bicolor (L.)
7. The role of statin drugs in combating cardiovascular diseases
8. Developmental changes in the theta response system: a single sweep analysis
9. The name is absent
10. Making International Human Rights Protection More Effective: A Rational-Choice Approach to the Effectiveness of Ius Standi Provisions