Tabl. 9: Synthetic Regional Vulnerability Index (SRVI) Ranking on scenario 4
|
SRVI Value by Scenario /10 |
Ranking | ||||||
|
Regions |
Country |
Prod. |
S1 agri |
S2 aval |
S3 eco |
S4 equi | |
|
Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki_________ |
G |
fru |
7,36 |
10,00 |
8,74 |
10,00 |
1 |
|
Thessalia_____________________________ |
G |
fru |
7,52 |
7,79 |
10,00 |
8,09 |
2 |
|
Calabria______________________________ |
I |
fru |
3,54 |
4,30 |
6,06 |
6,05 |
3 |
|
Castilla-La Mancha_________________ |
E |
veg |
3,21 |
5,62 |
5,32 |
4,70 |
4 |
|
Norte-Entre Douro__________________ |
P |
f&l |
10,00 |
4,29 |
5,84 |
4,65 |
5 |
|
Aragon_________________________ |
E |
fru |
4,13 |
3,17 |
5,39 |
4,55 |
6 |
|
Alentejo e Algarve___________________ |
P |
f&l |
3,84 |
3,12 |
5,32 |
4,11 |
7 |
|
Liguria_______________________________ |
I |
veg |
2,51 |
2,29 |
3,91 |
3,01 |
8 |
|
Toscana___________________________ |
I |
veg |
4,54 |
2,17 |
3,49 |
2,62 |
9 |
|
Lazio_______________________________ |
I |
veg |
4,14 |
2,38 |
2,88 |
2,36 |
10 |
|
Sterea Ellas-Nissi Egaeou-Kriti________ |
G |
veg |
2,07 |
2,33 |
2,79 |
2,31 |
11 |
|
Sicilia____________________________________ |
I |
f&l |
1,77 |
2,06 |
2,73 |
2,26 |
12 |
|
Midi-Pyrénées_____________________ |
F |
fru |
2,34 |
1,93 |
2,83 |
2,24 |
13 |
|
Centro-Ribatejo e Oeste______________ |
P |
f&l |
1,86 |
2,02 |
2,70 |
2,20 |
14 |
|
Veneto____________________________ |
I |
f&l |
2,07 |
2,01 |
2,58 |
2,12 |
15 |
|
Emilia Romagna__________________ |
I |
f&l |
1,51 |
1,79 |
2,32 |
1,94 |
16 |
|
Campania_______________________ |
I |
f&l |
1,62 |
1,85 |
2,30 |
1,92 |
17 |
|
Piemonte__________________________ |
I |
fru |
2,79 |
1,47 |
2,57 |
1,92 |
18 |
|
Cataluna____________________________ |
E |
fru |
2,81 |
1,73 |
2,37 |
1,88 |
19 |
|
Provence Alpes Côte d'Azur_________ |
F |
f&l |
1,70 |
1,73 |
2,24 |
1,84 |
20 |
|
Pays de la Loire_____________________ |
F |
veg |
2,08 |
1,42 |
2,37 |
1,77 |
21 |
|
Andalucia_________________________ |
E |
f&l |
1,52 |
1,71 |
2,13 |
1,76 |
22 |
|
Ipiros-Peloponissos-Nissi Ioniou______ |
G |
f&l |
1,22 |
1,60 |
2,13 |
1,75 |
23 |
|
Murcia___________________________ |
E |
f&l |
1,59 |
1,35 |
2,30 |
1,74 |
24 |
|
Valencia____________________________ |
E |
f&l |
1,47 |
1,42 |
2,12 |
1,70 |
25 |
|
Puglia______________________________ |
I |
veg |
2,04 |
1,12 |
2,31 |
1,65 |
26 |
|
Trentino______________________________ |
I |
fru |
1,76 |
0,99 |
2,23 |
1,56 |
27 |
|
Languedoc Roussillon_______________ |
F |
f&l |
1,16 |
1,14 |
1,86 |
1,44 |
28 |
|
Bretagne__________________________ |
F |
veg |
1,65 |
1,14 |
1,94 |
1,42 |
29 |
|
Rhône-Alpes______________________ |
F |
f&l |
1,54 |
1,09 |
1,64 |
1,27 |
30 |
|
Average 30 régions_________________ |
2,16 |
1,79 |
2,75 |
2,15 | |||
2.1 - Scenario 1: Strength of fruit and vegetable production
In this scenario, it is the performances of the agricultural sector (farms specialising in the production of
fruit and vegetables) which determine regional competitiveness. Vulnerability is thus the index of weak
relative inter-regional competitiveness. The ranking established using the SRVI for each region is not
identical to that of the score for fresh fruit and vegetables as the index includes variables other than those
of the agricultural production sector alone (industry, trade, regional economy). The scores obtained in this
first simulation range from 1.16 to 10, with an average of 2.16: more than 80% of the regions demonstrate
a vulnerability of less than 5/10.
The most vulnerable regions (Norte-Entre Douro, Thessalia, Makedonia, Toscana, Lazio) are relatively
poor and/or have a small fruit and vegetables sector, as well as being more specialised in either fruit
production or vegetable production. Inversely, the competitive regions produce both fruit and vegetables
in large quantities and in regions which are rich and highly populated.
12