Three Strikes and You.re Out: Reply to Cooper and Willis



Three Strikes and You’re Out: Reply to Cooper and Willis

Ricardo J. Caballero and Eduardo M.R.A. Engel

Abstract

Cooper and Willis (2003) is the latest in a sequence of criticisms of our methodology for
estimating aggregate nonlinearities when microeconomic adjustment is lumpy. Their case is based
on “reproducing” our main findings using artificial data generated by a model where microeconomic
agents face quadratic adjustment costs. That is, they supposedly find our results where they should
not be found. The three claims on which they base their case are incorrect. Their mistakes range
from misinterpreting their own simulation results to failing to understand the context in which our
procedures should be applied. They also claim that our approach
assumes that employment
decisions depend on the gap between the target and current level of unemployment. This is incorrect
as well, since the ‘gap approach’ has been derived formally from at least as sophisticated
microeconomic models as the one they present. On a more positive note, the correct interpretation
of Cooper and Willis’s results shows that our procedures are surprisingly robust to significant
departures from the assumptions made in our original derivations.

Keywords: Adjustment hazard, aggregate nonlinearities, lumpy adjustment, observed and
unobserved gaps, quadratic adjustment.

JEL Codes: E2, J2, J6.



More intriguing information

1. Innovation and business performance - a provisional multi-regional analysis
2. NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN FARM PRICE AND INCOME POLICY PROGRAMS: PART I. SITUATION AND PROBLEM
3. Opciones de política económica en el Perú 2011-2015
4. IMPROVING THE UNIVERSITY'S PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC POLICY EDUCATION
5. Getting the practical teaching element right: A guide for literacy, numeracy and ESOL teacher educators
6. ARE VOLATILITY EXPECTATIONS CHARACTERIZED BY REGIME SHIFTS? EVIDENCE FROM IMPLIED VOLATILITY INDICES
7. The effect of classroom diversity on tolerance and participation in England, Sweden and Germany
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent