TABLE 7
|
___________Determinants of participation to different categories of migration (logit models)___________ | ||||||
|
TEMPORARY |
PERMANENT |
INTERNATIONAL | ||||
|
Marginal and Raw Coeff. fixed effects |
Raw Coeff. |
Marginal and |
Raw Coeff. |
Marginal and | ||
|
Number of males in the hh. |
0.264 |
0.013 |
0.258 |
0.014 |
0.453 |
0.003 |
|
(3.49)*** |
(3.92)*** |
(4.87)*** | ||||
|
Number of females in the hh. |
-0.054 |
-0.003 |
0.039 |
0.002 |
0.334 |
0.002 |
|
-0.65 |
-0.51 |
(3.33)*** | ||||
|
Number of children in the hh. |
-0.082 |
-0.004 |
-0.136 |
-0.007 |
0.076 |
0.000 |
|
(2.04)** |
(3.31)*** |
-1.36 | ||||
|
Most educated in the hh |
-0.814 |
-0.040 |
0.512 |
0.028 |
0.521 |
0.003 |
|
(7.44)*** |
(5.86)*** |
(3.61)*** | ||||
|
Age of hh. head |
-0.014 |
-0.001 |
0.072 |
0.004 |
-0.011 |
0.000 |
|
-0.44 |
(2.40)** |
-0.25 | ||||
|
(Age of hh.head)2 |
0 |
0.000 |
-0.001 |
0.000 |
0 |
0.000 |
|
-0.04 |
(2.06)** |
-0.02 | ||||
|
Religion (whether it is Muslim) |
2.852 |
0.061 |
-0.075 |
-0.004 |
0.885 |
0.004 |
|
(5.39)*** |
-0.42 |
(2.98)*** | ||||
|
Land owned (pae) |
-2.674 |
-0.130 |
-1.392 |
-0.076 |
3.57 |
0.022 |
|
(4.45)*** |
(3.13)*** |
(3.10)*** | ||||
|
[Land owned (pae)]2 |
0.673 |
0.033 |
0.291 |
0.016 |
-2.388 |
-0.015 |
|
(5.39)*** |
(2.78)*** |
(2.33)** | ||||
|
Cattle owned (pae) |
0.275 |
0.013 |
-1.45 |
-0.079 |
-2.351 |
-0.015 |
|
-0.47 |
(3.90)*** |
(1.96)** | ||||
|
[Cattle owned (pae)]2 |
-0.75 |
-0.037 |
0.626 |
0.034 |
0.147 |
0.001 |
|
-1.19 |
(3.57)*** |
-0.08 | ||||
|
Farm equipment owned |
-0.128 |
-0.006 |
-0.148 |
-0.008 |
-0.012 |
0.000 |
|
-0.59 |
-1.17 |
-0.1 | ||||
|
Whether own tubwells |
-0.268 |
-0.012 |
0.537 |
0.036 |
0.645 |
0.005 |
|
-0.45 |
-1.07 |
-1.04 | ||||
|
N. of hhs. in the ‘bari’ |
0.001 |
0.000 |
0.01 |
0.001 |
-0.008 |
0.000 |
|
-0.09 |
-1.47 |
-0.71 | ||||
|
Self-poor assessment |
0.34 |
0.017 |
-0.115 |
-0.006 |
-1.143 |
-0.007 |
|
(2.60)*** |
-0.91 |
(4.39)*** | ||||
|
% out-temp. migrants in the village |
10.397 |
0.506 |
-1.636 |
-0.089 |
-0.041 |
0.000 |
|
(4.27)*** |
-0.7 |
-0.01 | ||||
|
% out-perm. migrants in the village |
-9.677 |
-0.471 |
11.811 |
0.641 |
1.91 |
0.012 |
|
(2.36)** |
(2.94)*** |
-0.25 | ||||
|
% out-intern. migrants in the village |
-7.316 |
-0.356 |
3.916 |
0.213 |
15.936 |
0.098 |
|
(2.58)*** |
-1.35 |
(3.24)*** | ||||
|
Network |
-0.04 |
-0.002 |
1.2 |
0.106 |
0.552 |
0.004 |
|
-0.16 |
(5.88)*** |
(1.87)* | ||||
|
Regional dummy |
-3.407 |
-0.206 |
0.068 |
0.004 |
-1.503 |
-0.010 |
|
(4.07)*** |
-0.08 |
-1.04 | ||||
|
Constant |
-1.462 |
-6.783 |
-7.292 | |||
|
________-1.24 |
(6.15)*** |
(4.12)*** | ||||
|
Observations |
3404 |
3404 |
3404 | |||
|
Pseudo R2 = |
0.248 |
0.257 |
0.351 | |||
|
Chi2(2)=29.04 |
Chi2(2) =9.83 |
Chi2(2)=11.78 | ||||
|
Joint Sign.Land1 |
P = 0.000 |
P = 0.007 |
P = 0.002 | |||
|
Chi2(2) = 2.89 |
Chi2(2)=16.27 |
Chi2(2)=15.25 | ||||
|
Joint Sign.Cattle2 |
P = 0.23 |
P=0.000 |
P=0.000 | |||
|
% of correct predicted probabilities |
87.93% |
88.22% |
96.09% | |||
|
Robust - statistics in parentheses; * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1% | ||||||
|
1 Joint significance of land owned and land owned squared. | ||||||
|
2 Joint significance of cattle owned and cattle owned squared. | ||||||
21
More intriguing information
1. The Making of Cultural Policy: A European Perspective2. The name is absent
3. Does Market Concentration Promote or Reduce New Product Introductions? Evidence from US Food Industry
4. Developing vocational practice in the jewelry sector through the incubation of a new ‘project-object’
5. Howard Gardner : the myth of Multiple Intelligences
6. Stable Distributions
7. Transgression et Contestation Dans Ie conte diderotien. Pierre Hartmann Strasbourg
8. The name is absent
9. Target Acquisition in Multiscale Electronic Worlds
10. Climate change, mitigation and adaptation: the case of the Murray–Darling Basin in Australia