TABLE 7
|
___________Determinants of participation to different categories of migration (logit models)___________ | ||||||
|
TEMPORARY |
PERMANENT |
INTERNATIONAL | ||||
|
Marginal and Raw Coeff. fixed effects |
Raw Coeff. |
Marginal and |
Raw Coeff. |
Marginal and | ||
|
Number of males in the hh. |
0.264 |
0.013 |
0.258 |
0.014 |
0.453 |
0.003 |
|
(3.49)*** |
(3.92)*** |
(4.87)*** | ||||
|
Number of females in the hh. |
-0.054 |
-0.003 |
0.039 |
0.002 |
0.334 |
0.002 |
|
-0.65 |
-0.51 |
(3.33)*** | ||||
|
Number of children in the hh. |
-0.082 |
-0.004 |
-0.136 |
-0.007 |
0.076 |
0.000 |
|
(2.04)** |
(3.31)*** |
-1.36 | ||||
|
Most educated in the hh |
-0.814 |
-0.040 |
0.512 |
0.028 |
0.521 |
0.003 |
|
(7.44)*** |
(5.86)*** |
(3.61)*** | ||||
|
Age of hh. head |
-0.014 |
-0.001 |
0.072 |
0.004 |
-0.011 |
0.000 |
|
-0.44 |
(2.40)** |
-0.25 | ||||
|
(Age of hh.head)2 |
0 |
0.000 |
-0.001 |
0.000 |
0 |
0.000 |
|
-0.04 |
(2.06)** |
-0.02 | ||||
|
Religion (whether it is Muslim) |
2.852 |
0.061 |
-0.075 |
-0.004 |
0.885 |
0.004 |
|
(5.39)*** |
-0.42 |
(2.98)*** | ||||
|
Land owned (pae) |
-2.674 |
-0.130 |
-1.392 |
-0.076 |
3.57 |
0.022 |
|
(4.45)*** |
(3.13)*** |
(3.10)*** | ||||
|
[Land owned (pae)]2 |
0.673 |
0.033 |
0.291 |
0.016 |
-2.388 |
-0.015 |
|
(5.39)*** |
(2.78)*** |
(2.33)** | ||||
|
Cattle owned (pae) |
0.275 |
0.013 |
-1.45 |
-0.079 |
-2.351 |
-0.015 |
|
-0.47 |
(3.90)*** |
(1.96)** | ||||
|
[Cattle owned (pae)]2 |
-0.75 |
-0.037 |
0.626 |
0.034 |
0.147 |
0.001 |
|
-1.19 |
(3.57)*** |
-0.08 | ||||
|
Farm equipment owned |
-0.128 |
-0.006 |
-0.148 |
-0.008 |
-0.012 |
0.000 |
|
-0.59 |
-1.17 |
-0.1 | ||||
|
Whether own tubwells |
-0.268 |
-0.012 |
0.537 |
0.036 |
0.645 |
0.005 |
|
-0.45 |
-1.07 |
-1.04 | ||||
|
N. of hhs. in the ‘bari’ |
0.001 |
0.000 |
0.01 |
0.001 |
-0.008 |
0.000 |
|
-0.09 |
-1.47 |
-0.71 | ||||
|
Self-poor assessment |
0.34 |
0.017 |
-0.115 |
-0.006 |
-1.143 |
-0.007 |
|
(2.60)*** |
-0.91 |
(4.39)*** | ||||
|
% out-temp. migrants in the village |
10.397 |
0.506 |
-1.636 |
-0.089 |
-0.041 |
0.000 |
|
(4.27)*** |
-0.7 |
-0.01 | ||||
|
% out-perm. migrants in the village |
-9.677 |
-0.471 |
11.811 |
0.641 |
1.91 |
0.012 |
|
(2.36)** |
(2.94)*** |
-0.25 | ||||
|
% out-intern. migrants in the village |
-7.316 |
-0.356 |
3.916 |
0.213 |
15.936 |
0.098 |
|
(2.58)*** |
-1.35 |
(3.24)*** | ||||
|
Network |
-0.04 |
-0.002 |
1.2 |
0.106 |
0.552 |
0.004 |
|
-0.16 |
(5.88)*** |
(1.87)* | ||||
|
Regional dummy |
-3.407 |
-0.206 |
0.068 |
0.004 |
-1.503 |
-0.010 |
|
(4.07)*** |
-0.08 |
-1.04 | ||||
|
Constant |
-1.462 |
-6.783 |
-7.292 | |||
|
________-1.24 |
(6.15)*** |
(4.12)*** | ||||
|
Observations |
3404 |
3404 |
3404 | |||
|
Pseudo R2 = |
0.248 |
0.257 |
0.351 | |||
|
Chi2(2)=29.04 |
Chi2(2) =9.83 |
Chi2(2)=11.78 | ||||
|
Joint Sign.Land1 |
P = 0.000 |
P = 0.007 |
P = 0.002 | |||
|
Chi2(2) = 2.89 |
Chi2(2)=16.27 |
Chi2(2)=15.25 | ||||
|
Joint Sign.Cattle2 |
P = 0.23 |
P=0.000 |
P=0.000 | |||
|
% of correct predicted probabilities |
87.93% |
88.22% |
96.09% | |||
|
Robust - statistics in parentheses; * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1% | ||||||
|
1 Joint significance of land owned and land owned squared. | ||||||
|
2 Joint significance of cattle owned and cattle owned squared. | ||||||
21
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. Cardiac Arrhythmia and Geomagnetic Activity
4. Large Scale Studies in den deutschen Sozialwissenschaften:Stand und Perspektiven. Bericht über einen Workshop der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft
5. The name is absent
6. The Nobel Memorial Prize for Robert F. Engle
7. The urban sprawl dynamics: does a neural network understand the spatial logic better than a cellular automata?
8. Regulation of the Electricity Industry in Bolivia: Its Impact on Access to the Poor, Prices and Quality
9. From music student to professional: the process of transition
10. Regional specialisation in a transition country - Hungary