Figure 1: First period strategic demand and supply in a closed economy
derived from these inter-temporal arbitrage activities. As the figure shows, the strategic
demand rotates around the (non-strategic) demand D at the second period equilibrium price
in the market track which, according to Lemma 1, is equal to Pe. Similarly, the strategic
supply rotates around the (non-strategic) supply S at Pe. To understand how S0 and D0 are
derived, let us consider the buyers’ decision (the problem faced by the producers is similar),
starting with the case in which a buyer’s marginal willingness to pay (MV) is higher than
P e . From Lemma 1, we know that he will always consume in the second period. If he enters
a transaction in the first period, his total payoff for the two periods will be
(1 + δ)(MV - P).
given that he is locked into the first period price P . If he does not enter a transaction in
the first period, he will be able to trade in the market track at the price Pe in the second
period. Thus his total payoff will be
δ(MV - Pe).
The buyer is indifferent about whether or not to carry out a transaction in the first period
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. Connectionism, Analogicity and Mental Content
4. Existentialism: a Philosophy of Hope or Despair?
5. Naïve Bayes vs. Decision Trees vs. Neural Networks in the Classification of Training Web Pages
6. Natural Resources: Curse or Blessing?
7. The name is absent
8. Mortality study of 18 000 patients treated with omeprazole
9. The name is absent
10. Growth and Technological Leadership in US Industries: A Spatial Econometric Analysis at the State Level, 1963-1997