Table 8. Volatility, Correlation and Specialization Coefficients Across Decades
Sector Volatility |
(3) | ||
(1) 1970s |
(2) | ||
Trade/Output |
0.131** |
0.148** |
0.246** |
(0.028) |
(0.033) |
(0.045) | |
Observations |
1401 |
1455 |
1431 |
R2 |
0.622 |
0.674 |
0.495 |
Comovement | |||
(1) |
(2) |
(3) | |
1970s |
1980s |
1990s | |
Trade/Output |
-0.030* |
-0.060** |
-0.064** |
(0.012) |
(0.016) |
(0.018) | |
Observations |
1378 |
1379 |
1404 |
R2 |
0.270 |
0.288 |
0.288 |
Specialization | |||
(1) |
(2) |
(3) | |
1970s |
1980s |
1990s | |
Trade/Output |
0.180 |
0.342** |
0.468** |
(0.130) |
(0.120) |
(0.136) | |
Observations |
52 |
51 |
50 |
R2 |
— |
— |
— |
Notes: Robust standard errors in parentheses. + significant at 10%; * significant at 5%; ** significant at 1%. Sector
volatility and comovement decade regressions run with country and sector fixed effects, corresponding to column (4)
of Tables 1 and 4. Specialization decade regressions run using IV, corresponding to column (3) of Table 7.
29
More intriguing information
1. Whatever happened to competition in space agency procurement? The case of NASA2. Macro-regional evaluation of the Structural Funds using the HERMIN modelling framework
3. A Principal Components Approach to Cross-Section Dependence in Panels
4. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 11
5. The name is absent
6. Searching Threshold Inflation for India
7. The name is absent
8. New Evidence on the Puzzles. Results from Agnostic Identification on Monetary Policy and Exchange Rates.
9. IMPROVING THE UNIVERSITY'S PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC POLICY EDUCATION
10. The name is absent