Table 9. Cross-Country and Cross-Decade Impacts of Changes in Openness
Sample |
____________________________Effect____________________________ | |||
Sector Volatility |
Comovement |
Specialization |
Total | |
Full ∆σA2 ∆σA2 /σA2 |
0.0009 0.1016 |
-0.0003 -0.0389 |
0.0011 0.1281 |
0.0016 0.1908 |
Developed |
0.0003 0.2432 |
-0.0001 -0.0945 |
0.0003 0.2517 |
0.0005 0.4005 |
Developing |
0.0012 0.1367 |
-0.0004 -0.0503 |
0.0018 0.1971 |
0.0025 0.2834 |
1970s |
0.0008 0.0717 |
-0.0004 -0.0369 |
0.0005 0.0451 |
0.0009 0.0799 |
1980s |
0.0007 0.0909 |
-0.0007 -0.0837 |
0.0008 0.1045 |
0.0009 0.1118 |
1990s |
0.0013 0.1865 |
-0.0007 -0.1015 |
0.0013 0.1918 |
0.0019 0.2767 |
Notes: This table reports the estimated change in aggregate volatility, in absolute terms (∆σA2 ), and relative to the
average aggregate volatility in the sample (∆σA2 /σA2 ). The first three columns report the individual effects, and the
last column the combined effect. The trade opening used in this table is equivalent to moving from the 25th to 75th
percentile of trade openness in the sample.
30
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. THE RISE OF RURAL-TO-RURAL LABOR MARKETS IN CHINA
4. Work Rich, Time Poor? Time-Use of Women and Men in Ireland
5. The name is absent
6. The Impact of EU Accession in Romania: An Analysis of Regional Development Policy Effects by a Multiregional I-O Model
7. THE WELFARE EFFECTS OF CONSUMING A CANCER PREVENTION DIET
8. The name is absent
9. Income Growth and Mobility of Rural Households in Kenya: Role of Education and Historical Patterns in Poverty Reduction
10. Confusion and Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Public Goods Games