Table 9. Cross-Country and Cross-Decade Impacts of Changes in Openness
|
Sample |
____________________________Effect____________________________ | |||
|
Sector Volatility |
Comovement |
Specialization |
Total | |
|
Full ∆σA2 ∆σA2 /σA2 |
0.0009 0.1016 |
-0.0003 -0.0389 |
0.0011 0.1281 |
0.0016 0.1908 |
|
Developed |
0.0003 0.2432 |
-0.0001 -0.0945 |
0.0003 0.2517 |
0.0005 0.4005 |
|
Developing |
0.0012 0.1367 |
-0.0004 -0.0503 |
0.0018 0.1971 |
0.0025 0.2834 |
|
1970s |
0.0008 0.0717 |
-0.0004 -0.0369 |
0.0005 0.0451 |
0.0009 0.0799 |
|
1980s |
0.0007 0.0909 |
-0.0007 -0.0837 |
0.0008 0.1045 |
0.0009 0.1118 |
|
1990s |
0.0013 0.1865 |
-0.0007 -0.1015 |
0.0013 0.1918 |
0.0019 0.2767 |
Notes: This table reports the estimated change in aggregate volatility, in absolute terms (∆σA2 ), and relative to the
average aggregate volatility in the sample (∆σA2 /σA2 ). The first three columns report the individual effects, and the
last column the combined effect. The trade opening used in this table is equivalent to moving from the 25th to 75th
percentile of trade openness in the sample.
30
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. POWER LAW SIGNATURE IN INDONESIAN LEGISLATIVE ELECTION 1999-2004
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Dual Track Reforms: With and Without Losers
6. On the Relation between Robust and Bayesian Decision Making
7. Giant intra-abdominal hydatid cysts with multivisceral locations
8. Trade Openness and Volatility
9. Human Development and Regional Disparities in Iran:A Policy Model
10. The name is absent