Table A5. Correlation of Annual Output Growth per Worker with Rest of the Manufacturing Sector: Cross-Sectional Robustness
Results
|
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
(5) |
(6) |
(7) |
(8) | ||
|
Trade/Output |
-0.033** |
-0.024* |
-0.052** |
-0.033* |
-0.027** |
-0.022* |
-0.059** |
-0.028** | |
|
(0.0f0) |
(0.040) |
(0.008) |
(0.014) |
(0.010) |
(0.011) |
(0.009) |
(0.010) | ||
|
Output per worker |
0.029* |
-0.042* |
-0.045** |
-0.043** |
0.000 |
-0.043* | |||
|
(0.014) |
(0.017) |
(0.017) |
(0.017) |
(0.014) |
(0.017) | ||||
|
Avg. output per worker |
-0.085** | ||||||||
|
(0.020) | |||||||||
|
Growth of output per worker |
-0.130 | ||||||||
|
(0.272) | |||||||||
|
Var(TOT) |
-0.010** | ||||||||
|
(0.003) | |||||||||
|
Var(TOT) ×Trade∕ Output |
0.001 | ||||||||
|
(0.002) | |||||||||
|
CC QO |
Var(Trade) |
0.006 |
0.011* | ||||||
|
(0.005) |
(0.005) | ||||||||
|
Var(Trade) × Trade/Output |
0.006* | ||||||||
|
(0.003) | |||||||||
|
Share of manuf. trade |
0.307** | ||||||||
|
(0.052) | |||||||||
|
Liq. needs×Private credit∕GDP |
-1.500** | ||||||||
|
(0.425) | |||||||||
|
Observations |
Ï5Ï5 |
Ï5Ï5 |
1495 |
1495 |
Ï5Ï5 |
Ï5Ï5 |
1487 |
Ï5Ï5 | |
|
R2_________________________ |
0.376 |
0.367 |
0.108 |
0.373 |
0.372 |
0.375 |
0.118 |
0.406 | |
|
μc |
yθs |
yes |
no |
yes |
yes |
yes |
no |
yes | |
|
μi_________________________________ |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes | |
Notes: Robust standard errors in parentheses. + significant at 10%; * significant at 5%; *t significant at 1%. The sample period is 1970-99.
The dependent variable is the correlation of the growth rate of output per worker with the rest of the manufacturing sector, 1970-99. All
variables are in natural logs except for Liq. needs×Private credit∕GDP and Output per worker growth. ‘Liq. needs’ stands for Raddatz (2005),s
sector-level measure of liquidity needs, which is inventories over sales, calculated using COMPUSTAT data. All variables are period averages,
except for output per worker which is the period’s initial value, μc denotes the country fixed effects, μi denotes the sector fixed effects. All
specifications are estimated using OLS.
More intriguing information
1. Should Local Public Employment Services be Merged with the Local Social Benefit Administrations?2. CROSS-COMMODITY PERSPECTIVE ON CONTRACTING: EVIDENCE FROM MISSISSIPPI
3. Impacts of Tourism and Fiscal Expenditure on Remote Islands in Japan: A Panel Data Analysis
4. Enterpreneurship and problems of specialists training in Ukraine
5. Une Classe de Concepts
6. Secondary stress in Brazilian Portuguese: the interplay between production and perception studies
7. The name is absent
8. Density Estimation and Combination under Model Ambiguity
9. Moffett and rhetoric
10. Food Prices and Overweight Patterns in Italy