26
Table A2
Augmented Dickey-Fuller unit root tests, Germany
Series |
West Germany, 1985:1-1998:4 |
Germany, 1993:1-2004:4 | ||
Levels |
First differences |
Levels |
First differences | |
GDP |
-1.49 |
-2.35 |
-1.92 |
-7.30*** |
U |
-2.35 |
-2.44 |
-1.68 |
-3.60*** |
π |
-1.05 |
-10.74*** |
-3.57** |
-11.06*** |
π2 |
-1.50 |
-4.54*** |
-2.28 |
-7.43*** |
π3 |
-0.87 |
-4.80*** |
-1.72 |
-2.60* |
π4 |
-1.91 |
-1.27 |
-2.44 |
-3.42** |
S^ee |
-1.51 |
-11.05*** |
-6.81*** |
-10.79*** |
sDff |
-1.17 |
-9.83*** |
-3.88** |
-10.72*** |
S^om |
-7.26*** |
-2.51 |
-10.43*** |
-6.15*** |
^WMecd |
-5.94*** |
-9.05*** |
-7.05*** |
-11.99*** |
S‘r 20 |
-5.82*** |
_______-8.63*** |
-7.26** |
-11.08*** |
Notes: The lag length is automatically selected based on AIC. The only exogenous variable in the first-
differenced model is a constant, while the test in levels also includes a time trend. The null hypothesis
states that the time series has a unit root. The test statistics are compared with MacKinnon (1996) one-
sided p-values. *** (**) (*) denotes rejection of the null hypothesis at the 0.99 (0.95) (0.90) level.
Table A3:
KPSS unit root tests, Germany
Series |
West Germany, 1985:1-1998:4 |
Germany, 1993:1-2004:4 | ||
Levels |
First differences |
Levels |
First difference | |
GDP |
0.19** |
0.24 |
0.12* |
0.11 |
U |
0.20** |
0.25 |
0.16** |
0.43* |
∏ |
0.23*** |
0.12 |
0.25*** |
0.11 |
π2 |
0.23*** |
0.17 |
0.25*** |
0.42* |
π3 |
0.23*** |
0.29 |
0.25*** |
0.53** |
π4 |
0.23*** |
0.29 |
0.22*** |
0.51** |
S^ee |
0.18** |
0.09 |
0.17** |
0.06 |
saif |
0.14* |
0.12 |
0.10 |
0.04 |
$Мот |
0.10 |
0.05 |
0.03 |
0.11 |
sWMecd |
0.15** |
0.06 |
0.19** |
0.08 |
S' 20 |
0.16** |
__________0.05________ |
0.19** |
_________0.06________ |
Notes: The bandwidth is automatically selected based on a Newey-West using a Bartlett kernel. The
only exogenous variable in the first-differenced model is a constant, while the test in levels also in-
cludes a time trend. The null hypothesis states that the time series is (trend-) stationary. The test statis-
tics are compared with the critical values from Kwiatkowski-Phillips-Schmidt-Shin (1992, Table 1).
*** (**) (*) denotes rejection of the null hypothesis at the 0.99 (0.95) (0.90) level.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Solidaristic Wage Bargaining
3. FOREIGN AGRICULTURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS AND FOREIGN RELATIONS
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The Role of Evidence in Establishing Trust in Repositories
7. Land Police in Mozambique: Future Perspectives
8. The name is absent
9. How we might be able to understand the brain
10. Fighting windmills? EU industrial interests and global climate negotiations