Rural-Urban Economic Disparities among China’s Elderly



Table 1: Comparison of Individual and Household Characteristics

Characteristic________________

Rural

Urban

Average age

69.0

68.4

Number of years of schooling

1.2

4.14

Number of children

4.1

3.8

Household size

3.5

3.3

Percentage female_____________

52.7

51.8

The age disparity becomes more significant when we disaggregate the elderly into
three age groups - 60 to 69 (young), 70 to 79 (old) and more than 80 (oldest old) - as
shown in Table 2. The young age group accounts for 61.8% of urban households but only
59.3% of the rural households. The oldest old, on the other hand represent 8.4% of the
rural households but only 7.1% of the urban.

Table 2: Age distribution of Heads of Household

Age Group

____Urban____

_____Rural_____

60 - 69

6,107

61.8 %

6,047

59.3 %

70 - 79

3,079

31.1

3,288

32.3

80 +

703

7.1

859

8.4

Total_______

9,889

100.0

10,194

100.0

Rural households exhibit a much lower level of schooling than the urban
counterparts, with 1.2 years of schooling, compared to 4.14. Table 3 gives a more detailed
view of the level of education. About three fourths of the rural elderly have education
below the elementary level and only one percent have high school or higher education
level. The Urban elderly have much higher levels of schooling overall.

Table 3: Education Level of Heads of Household (%)

Rural Urban

None/very little

74.4

41.2

Elementary

20.1

26.8

Middle school

4.4

15.5

High school

.7

6.8

Technical school

.2

2.5

College

.1

3.3

University___________

.0

3.9



More intriguing information

1. The fundamental determinants of financial integration in the European Union
2. SOME ISSUES CONCERNING SPECIFICATION AND INTERPRETATION OF OUTDOOR RECREATION DEMAND MODELS
3. Program Semantics and Classical Logic
4. Deprivation Analysis in Declining Inner City Residential Areas: A Case Study From Izmir, Turkey.
5. The name is absent
6. Non-causality in Bivariate Binary Panel Data
7. POWER LAW SIGNATURE IN INDONESIAN LEGISLATIVE ELECTION 1999-2004
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent