For the moment, our model is an estimation. We cannot
precisely identify to which age it corresponds. Our goal is to
stratify it so that we would have a model for each age.
Developmental models would then be able to be simulated.
Acknowledgements
This work was done while the second author was in
sabbatical at the university of Aix-Marseille. We would like
to thank D. Chesnet, E. Lambert and M.-A. Schelstraete, for
providing us with parts of the corpus, F. de la Haye for the
association data as well as M. Bourguet and H. Thomas for
the design of the vocabulary test. We also thank P. Dessus
and E. de Vries for their comments on a previous version.
References
Bellegarda, J. (2000) Exploiting Latent Semantic
Information in statistical language modeling. Proceedings
of IEEE, 88 (8), 1279-1296.
Bellissens, C., Thiesbonenkamp, J. & Denhiere, G. (2002).
Property attribution in metaphor comprehension:
simulations of topic and vehicle contribution within the
LSA-CI framework. Twelfth Annual Meeting of the
Society for Text and Discourse, June 2002.
Borgida, A. (1996). On the relative expressive power of
description logics and predicate calculus, Artificial
Intelligence, 82, 353-367.
Burgess, C. (1998). From simple associations to the
building blocks of language: modeling meaning in
memory with the HAL model. Behavior Research
Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 188-198.
Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T.
K. & Harshman, R. (1990). Indexing by Latent Semantic
Indexing. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science , 41-6, 391-407.
de la Haye, F. (2003). Normes d'associations verbales chez
des enfants de 9, 10 et 11 ans et des adultes. LAnnee
Psychologique, 103, 109-130.
Dumais, S. D. (2003). Data-driven approaches to
information access. Cognitive Science 27 (3), 491-524.
Foltz, P. W. (1996). Latent Semantic Analysis for text-
based research. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments
and Computers, 28-2, 197-202.
French, R.M. & Labiouse, C (2002). Four problems with
extracting human semantics from large text corpora.
Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the
Cognitive Science Society, NJ:LEA.
Howard, M.W. & Kahanna, M.J. (2002). When does
semantic similarity help episodic retrieval? Journal of
Memory and Language 46, 85-98.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse
comprehension: a construction-integration model.
Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
Kintsch, W. (2000). Metaphor comprehension: a
computational theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7-
2, 257-266.
Kontostathis, A. & Pottenger, W.M. (2002). Detecting
patterns in the LSI term-term matrix. Workshop on the
Foundation of Data Mining and Discovery, IEEE
International Conference on Data Mining.
Laham, D. (1997). Latent Semantic Analysis approaches to
categorization. In M. G. Shafto & P. Langley (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 19th annual meeting of the Cognitive
Science Society (p. 979). Mawhwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Landauer, T. K. & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to
Plato's problem : the Latent Semantic Analysis theory of
acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge.
Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W. & Laham, D. (1998). An
introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse
Processes , 25, 259-284.
Landauer (2002). On the computational basis of learning
and cognition: Arguments from LSA. In N. Ross (Ed.),
The psychology of Learning and Motivation, 41, 43-84.
Lemaire, B & Dessus, P. (2001). A system to assess the
semantic content of student essay. Journal of Educational
Computing Research, 24-3, 305-320.
Lemaire, B. & Bianco, M. (2003). Contextual effects on
metaphor comprehension: experiment and simulation.
Proc. of the 5th International Conference on Cognitive
Modeling (ICCM'2003), Bamberg, Germany.
Lenat, D.B. (1995). CYC: A large-scale investment in
knowledge infrastructure. Comm. of the ACM, 11, 32-38.
Pariollaud, F., Denhiere, D. & Verstiggel, J.C. (2002)
Comprehension of idiomatic expressions: effect of
meaning salience. Proc. of the 9th Int. Conference on
Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty
in Knowledge-Based Systems (IPMU), Annecy, July 1-5.
Perfetti, C. A. (1998). The limits of co-occurrence: tools
and theories in language research. Discourse Processes,
25, 363-377.
Quesada, J., Kintsch, W., & Gomez E. (2002) A theory of
complex problem solving using Latent Semantic
Analysis. In W. D. Gray & C. D. Schunn (Eds.)
Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the
Cognitive Science Society. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,
Mahwah, NJ.
Rehder, B., Schreiner, M. E., Wolfe, M. B. W., Laham, D.,
Landauer, T. K. & Kintsch, W. (1998). Using Latent
Semantic Analysis to assess knowledge: some technical
considerations. Discourse Processes, 25, 337-354.
Sowa, J.F. (1991). Principles of Semantic Networks:
Exploration in the Representation of Knowledge, Morgan
Kaufmann.
Turney, P. (2001). Mining the Web for synonyms: PMI-IR
versus LSA on TOEFL. In De Raedt, L. and Flach, P.,
(Eds). Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on
Machine Learning (ECML-2001) , 491-502, Freiburg.
Vossen, P. (2003). Ontologies. In R. Mitkov (Ed.) The
Oxford Handboof of Computational Linguistics. Oxford,
464-482.
Wolfe, M. B. W., Schreiner, M. E., Rehder, B., Laham, D.,
Foltz, P. W., Kintsch & W., Landauer, T. K. (1998).
Learning from text: matching readers and texts by Latent
Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 309-336.
Wolfe, M.B.W. & Goldman, S.R. (2003) Use of Latent
Semantic Analysis for predicting psychological
phenomena: two issues and proposed solutions. Behavior
Research Methods Instruments & Computer, 35(1), 22-
31.