The name is absent



IOl

Table 7.7: Municipal Models

Model 1

Model 2

% of Municipal Bills

-1.92

(1.78)

N of Municipal Bills

-0.08*

(0.05)

Previous Mayor

-3.34***

-3.09***

(1.04)

(0.99)

Distance to Median

-1.04

-1.60

(1.82)

(1-77)

Distance to Majority Median

-0.18

0.37

(1.43)

(1.37)

Committee Chair

-1.53*

-1.48*

(0.79)

(0.76)

PJ member

-0.29

-0.07

(0.94)

(0.94)

Provincial Party Member

-0.17

-0.04

(1.24)

(1.22)

District Magnitude

-0.06**

-0.06**

(0.03)

(0.03)

Outgoing Mayor's Party

1.07

0.97

(0.88)

(0.88)

Population Ratio

-4.79*

-4.58*

(2.52)

(2.43)

Constant

2.37*

1.99*

(1∙25)

(1.20)

Observations

89

89

R2

0.20

0.21

Empirical evidence suggests that the direction stated in hypothesis 8.4 is
definitely wrong. Contrary to the belief that bigger districts might have better
opportunities structures and therefore improve legislators' prospective chances; better
results have been obtained in smaller-scale municipalities. As it becomes visible in
Figure 7.2, chances of winning range from 35% when districts are almost insignificant to
11% when municipalities comprise about half of the provincial population. Should this



More intriguing information

1. Putting Globalization and Concentration in the Agri-food Sector into Context
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Disentangling the Sources of Pro-social Behavior in the Workplace: A Field Experiment
5. The name is absent
6. Convergence in TFP among Italian Regions - Panel Unit Roots with Heterogeneity and Cross Sectional Dependence
7. PACKAGING: A KEY ELEMENT IN ADDED VALUE
8. Has Competition in the Japanese Banking Sector Improved?
9. Government spending composition, technical change and wage inequality
10. Ability grouping in the secondary school: attitudes of teachers of practically based subjects