The name is absent

IOl

Table 7.7: Municipal Models

	Model 1	Model 2
% of Municipal Bills		-1.92
		(1.78)
N of Municipal Bills	-0.08*
	(0.05)
Previous Mayor	-3.34***	-3.09***
	(1.04)	(0.99)
Distance to Median	-1.04	-1.60
	(1.82)	(1-77)
Distance to Majority Median	-0.18	0.37
	(1.43)	(1.37)
Committee Chair	-1.53*	-1.48*
	(0.79)	(0.76)
PJ member	-0.29	-0.07
	(0.94)	(0.94)
Provincial Party Member	-0.17	-0.04
	(1.24)	(1.22)
District Magnitude	-0.06**	-0.06**
	(0.03)	(0.03)
Outgoing Mayor's Party	1.07	0.97
	(0.88)	(0.88)
Population Ratio	-4.79*	-4.58*
	(2.52)	(2.43)
Constant	2.37*	1.99*
	(1∙25)	(1.20)
Observations	89	89
R2	0.20	0.21

Empirical evidence suggests that the direction stated in hypothesis 8.4 is
definitely wrong. Contrary to the belief that bigger districts might have better
opportunities structures and therefore improve legislators' prospective chances; better
results have been obtained in smaller-scale municipalities. As it becomes visible in
Figure 7.2, chances of winning range from 35% when districts are almost insignificant to
11% when municipalities comprise about half of the provincial population. Should this

More intriguing information

1. Improving Business Cycle Forecasts’ Accuracy - What Can We Learn from Past Errors?
2. Orientation discrimination in WS 2
3. Critical Race Theory and Education: Racism and antiracism in educational theory and praxis David Gillborn*
4. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten QualitÃ¤tsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln
5. The name is absent
6. Public-private sector pay differentials in a devolved Scotland
7. Menarchial Age of Secondary School Girls in Urban and Rural Areas of Rivers State, Nigeria
8. The name is absent
9. The Integration Order of Vector Autoregressive Processes
10. Cross-Country Evidence on the Link between the Level of Infrastructure and Capital Inflows