65
Table 5.8: Random Intercepts by Province
.. ■ Province |
Intercept |
BUENOS AIRES |
-0.23 |
CAP FEDERAL |
-6.60 |
Catamarca |
0.82 |
CHACO |
0.42 |
CHUBUT |
1.32 |
CORDOBA |
0.67 |
Corrientes |
0.99 |
ENTRE RIOS |
1.31 |
FORMOSA |
0.64 |
JUJUY |
1.03 |
LA PAMPA |
0.74 |
LA RIOJA |
0.74 |
MENDOZA |
-5.47 |
MISIONES |
-5.19 |
NEUQUEN |
0.99 |
RIO NEGRO |
1.47 |
S DEL ESTERO |
1.42 |
SALTA |
0.96 |
SANJUAN |
0.15 |
SAN LUIS |
1.48 |
SANTA CRUZ |
1.25 |
SANTAFE |
0.91 |
tdelfuego |
0.93 |
TUCUMAN |
0.35 |
GubernatorialResults
Empirical tests of the gubernatorial hypotheses show that the intuition was
globally correct, but without a notion of how powerful the effect was going to be.
Namely, my expectation was not to find any statistical significance in the coefficient of
previous governors. In the two estimated models, having a previous gubernatorial
background is strongly negatively correlated with the chances of submitting province-
More intriguing information
1. Dynamiques des Entreprises Agroalimentaires (EAA) du Languedoc-Roussillon : évolutions 1998-2003. Programme de recherche PSDR 2001-2006 financé par l'Inra et la Région Languedoc-Roussillon2. Better policy analysis with better data. Constructing a Social Accounting Matrix from the European System of National Accounts.
3. Before and After the Hartz Reforms: The Performance of Active Labour Market Policy in Germany
4. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ALTERNATIVE ECONOMETRIC PACKAGES: AN APPLICATION TO ITALIAN DEPOSIT INTEREST RATES
5. The name is absent
6. The technological mediation of mathematics and its learning
7. The name is absent
8. Bridging Micro- and Macro-Analyses of the EU Sugar Program: Methods and Insights
9. Nietzsche, immortality, singularity and eternal recurrence1
10. Yield curve analysis